Great fighters who stayed too long
yeah...holmes was really something,even in his much later years,and even though i mentioned duran in my list,mainly because of the joppy fight,i gotta say that he had one last great fight at the age of 46.the return match win against jorge castro.that was a great win for roberto.he should've retired right after that triumph,instead of sticking around to fight joppy.Decagon wrote:Larry Holmes never lost his dignity, even fighting at age 50.p4p1 wrote:larry holmes?
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Larry Holmes lost his dignity after his behaviour following Spinks. & as a fighter, he would be a great example of a guy going way too far, were it not for the fact that there are just too many others like him for him to stand out. For Holmes, anyone past Tyson in '88 was too long. His last fight ended up being in '02.
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Larry Holmes lost his dignity after his behaviour following Spinks. & as a fighter, he would be a great example of a guy going way too far, were it not for the fact that there are just too many others like him for him to stand out. For Holmes, anyone past Tyson in '88 was too long. His last fight ended up being in '02.
i have to disagree.what about that really impressive win over ray mercer in 1992!!....furthermore,it is a crying shame that him and foreman never got to get it on.this would've been a very intriguing fight even if it had taken place as late as 1994.after that,it would have been too slow paced and boring.Alot of clinching probably.
-
MEISINGER
- Heavyweight

-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
I'm not saying he couldn't still win fights. I'm talking about him as a fighter & what he could get done, relative to his prime. & the Larry Holmes of any time in the 90's (you can pick, it makes little difference) was well & truly on the other side of the mountain. It's one thing if you are a Foreman-type who can still punch (& even then that almost always isn't enough), but Holmes didn't even have that. I'm fairly confident a younger Holmes would have accounted for Tyson, but he was just blown out in their meeting, simply because he was too old. & largely he struggled with/lost to fighters who would have been annihilated by the late 70's/early 80's Holmes.
You can (rightly) point out beating Mercer as evidence he didn't stay too long, but it works in both directions. You must also acknowledge he had many efforts against lesser competition that would never have been so difficult when he was younger. He lost to Oliver McCall, for example!
You can (rightly) point out beating Mercer as evidence he didn't stay too long, but it works in both directions. You must also acknowledge he had many efforts against lesser competition that would never have been so difficult when he was younger. He lost to Oliver McCall, for example!
-
ringsider
- Heavyweight

-
BigJuicyHog
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 749
- Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 22:24
-
Heartbreak_Kid79
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 418
- Joined: 09 Nov 2006, 13:39