Page 2 of 3
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 02:57
by Ross
Grant wrote:freedomfighter wrote:for people who are'nt prize fighters must understand that boxing is a business, mundine needs to keep active be seen and (maybe not heard) choc is'nt the only fighter that takes easy fights they all do while they wait for a title shot or a fight thats worth money . I think he's doing the right thing by keeping active. spectators , fans , the public say he should fight "MR X" the fighters might think ok but promoters mangers and all asossciated with the fighter all got their hands out they need to eat so if theres not enough coin for everybody to be happy it's just good business to take easier fights for good money low over heads etc. Who wants to see a fight if danny or choc or anyone if they got 15 losses on his record to many losses causes the fighters perception of "super human" to be tarnished . its more exciting when someone 0 has to go because 1 fighter will lose the invicible tag. and its what promoters market to the public. prize fighting is so cruel to fighters if he loses once he's a loser and all the knockers come out with the 2 cents worth "I knew that would happen" "hes crap" etc . just let him do what fighters do if he keeps active and seen he'll get a crack a top guy soon and try understand what happens behind the scenes, in this game to many politics plenty of crooks and thugs .I too wish things could be easier ,OZ is fortunate to have a talent like choc and danny . enough gas bagging I'm just pasionate about this game and believe everyone deserve a good go if you think you can do better than the guys in there right now please strap the gloves on or put on your promoters /mangers hat and have a good go then u see from the fighters eyes its different standing inside the fire
I can see some of your points but Its just that Anthony keeps on talking about 'greatness'.
Perhaps a bit of acknowledgement that as a boxer he has done nothing that is anywhere near 'greatness' So far a very, very average 'Champion' at best.
His record speaks nothing above the ordinary as a boxer. And thats the fact, Jack
Again well said could notn have said it better myself, to the average Australian AM may be able to sell his dillustion that he is something special but to the knowledgable fan we know he is average
Ross
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 03:17
by Collins2000
Grant wrote:freedomfighter wrote:for people who are'nt prize fighters must understand that boxing is a business, mundine needs to keep active be seen and (maybe not heard) choc is'nt the only fighter that takes easy fights they all do while they wait for a title shot or a fight thats worth money . I think he's doing the right thing by keeping active. spectators , fans , the public say he should fight "MR X" the fighters might think ok but promoters mangers and all asossciated with the fighter all got their hands out they need to eat so if theres not enough coin for everybody to be happy it's just good business to take easier fights for good money low over heads etc. Who wants to see a fight if danny or choc or anyone if they got 15 losses on his record to many losses causes the fighters perception of "super human" to be tarnished . its more exciting when someone 0 has to go because 1 fighter will lose the invicible tag. and its what promoters market to the public. prize fighting is so cruel to fighters if he loses once he's a loser and all the knockers come out with the 2 cents worth "I knew that would happen" "hes crap" etc . just let him do what fighters do if he keeps active and seen he'll get a crack a top guy soon and try understand what happens behind the scenes, in this game to many politics plenty of crooks and thugs .I too wish things could be easier ,OZ is fortunate to have a talent like choc and danny . enough gas bagging I'm just pasionate about this game and believe everyone deserve a good go if you think you can do better than the guys in there right now please strap the gloves on or put on your promoters /mangers hat and have a good go then u see from the fighters eyes its different standing inside the fire
I can see some of your points but Its just that Anthony keeps on talking about 'greatness'.
Perhaps a bit of acknowledgement that as a boxer he has done nothing that is anywhere near 'greatness' So far a very, very average 'Champion' at best.
His record speaks nothing above the ordinary as a boxer. And thats the fact, Jack
That's it in a nutshell.
Mundine Jnr has accomplished probaly less than Mundine Snr so far. In a (perfect) world of one champ at every weight Anthony would be a contender but always fall short of being world champ. If he had to fight legitmate door-keepers like his old man did his record would have more than a couple of losses on it.
Still, it's the boxing world we live in now. In his mind he's a two time world champ and an all time great.
I respect the way he's managed to corner a PPV niche though. I suppose without his high profile and foot in mouth comments he wouldn't get all those $30 buys that other aussie boxers can only dream of. No doubt lots of punters pay in the hope of seeing him sparked but they still pay.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 03:28
by 2doggs
Apparently Mundine and Green are certain for a rematch some time next year at light heavy.
Any thoughts?

Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 03:39
by Collins2000
2doggs wrote:Apparently Mundine and Green are certain for a rematch some time next year at light heavy.
Any thoughts?

Might be worth seeing as long as it's at 175.
At 168 Mundine had little trouble with Danny last time and no reason to think it would be much different if they did it again.
Still, I'd rather see Mundine fight some of the top men in the division he seems best suited to.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 04:11
by Bushboy
i think it will happen..
this is mundines chance to state that he is a 3 time 2 division world champ.. obviously the odds will be on mundine...
but.
danny green is renewed by a great deal and i dont think anyone can dispute that, a puncher always has a punchers chance and hes one hell of a puncher
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 17:06
by 2doggs
I think it will be a great fight to see as Green is such a better fighter at light heavy, not sure about Mundine.
If Green wins I guess there will have to be a third fight, maybe in ten years time when they have both blown out to super heavywieght!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 20:12
by GM #1
Freedom- you are correct in what you say but then choc can't have his cake and eat it too. by that I mean claiming he is pound for pound the greatest, ebtter than fenech etc etc. at this stage he isn't even in top 6/7 of all time ozzies.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 22:23
by jezzamundo
Let me first state that I am a big Green fan and not a Mundine fan.
However, I believe that to say Mundine is nothing special, or average, is completely wrong. I agree that his achievements are nothing exceptional, and that he is a questionable world champ. However, I also think that his achievements are no where near as good as they could/should be. He was just ahead of Ottke when he was stopped, and was very inexperienced at the time. His loss to Siaca I attribute greatly to Choc's injured ankle, which was clearly affecting him, he would easily beat Siaca if he was even 90%. His loss to Kessler was a genuine defeat against a formidable opponent, he lost a clear decision. Now his (self inflicted) eye injury may stop him from achieving his potential - I believe Mundine should go down to middleweight, where I think he would beat Pavlik, Taylor and Wright (although they may move to 168lb), which would make him a clear P4P top 10.
Interesting point: If Green beats Drews he will have done something that Mundine has never done - winning a legitimate world title outright (not a vacated title, not a title with a super champ above him).
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 22:59
by toppity
this was on boxingtalk.com, this is quality slap from Fox Sports News-
MUNDINE TO APPEAR IN FARCE TITLE BOUT
In a joke of a so-called world title fight, Anthony Mundine will risk his paper WBA regular title against a stiff from Argentina named Jose Alberto Clavero. The farce will take place in Australia on December 10, 2007. How bad is this fight? Anybody who knows anything about boxing can tell you that the only legitimate champion at 168 pounds is the winner of tomorrow's Joe Calzaghe-Mikkel Kessler fight, including the WBA, which recognizes Kessler as a "super champion" and Mundine as a regular champion. Meanwhile, Clavero, 27-5, has not beaten anyone with a winning record since 2003, and is 0-2-1 in his last three, including a disqualification for not trying. He has never beaten anyone good, ever (unless you count Dario Victor Galindez, which we dont). Mundine is coming back from a self-inflicted eye infection caused by licking his own contact lens. source: fox sports australia
Posted: 03 Nov 2007, 22:02
by Grant
jezzamundo wrote:Let me first state that I am a big Green fan and not a Mundine fan.
However, I believe that to say Mundine is nothing special, or average, is completely wrong. I agree that his achievements are nothing exceptional, and that he is a questionable world champ. However, I also think that his achievements are no where near as good as they could/should be. He was just ahead of Ottke when he was stopped, and was very inexperienced at the time. His loss to Siaca I attribute greatly to Choc's injured ankle, which was clearly affecting him, he would easily beat Siaca if he was even 90%. His loss to Kessler was a genuine defeat against a formidable opponent, he lost a clear decision. Now his (self inflicted) eye injury may stop him from achieving his potential - I believe Mundine should go down to middleweight, where I think he would beat Pavlik, Taylor and Wright (although they may move to 168lb), which would make him a clear P4P top 10.
Interesting point: If Green beats Drews he will have done something that Mundine has never done - winning a legitimate world title outright (not a vacated title, not a title with a super champ above him).
I think you misunderstood me, I am refering to his acheivements in the ring as being average and far below what i believe he can achieve. (he must step up) he won a vacant world title first up and lost it in his second defence to a guy who no one would call great. This title is a paper title no doubt. I just want him to say something like "i have a long way to go to be great" this title is bogus. He is capable of much more. I won't pay for this fight, no way it is not worthy of my hard earned.
Posted: 04 Nov 2007, 02:51
by jezzamundo
I think you misunderstood me, I am refering to his acheivements in the ring as being average and far below what i believe he can achieve. (he must step up) he won a vacant world title first up and lost it in his second defence to a guy who no one would call great. This title is a paper title no doubt. I just want him to say something like "i have a long way to go to be great" this title is bogus. He is capable of much more. I won't pay for this fight, no way it is not worthy of my hard earned.
Agreed 100%
Posted: 04 Nov 2007, 08:35
by p4p1
i dont have a huge problem with mundine fighing a sub-standard fighter in this bout for 2 reasons 1 its not the real world title and 2 i think he should be givin the chance to fight a easy7 tune-up fight to see how his eye is and wether or not he can still fight as well as he needs to to be a top fighter in his division
Posted: 04 Nov 2007, 18:25
by Marlin
p4p1 wrote:i dont have a huge problem with mundine fighing a sub-standard fighter in this bout for 2 reasons 1 its not the real world title and 2 i think he should be givin the chance to fight a easy7 tune-up fight to see how his eye is and wether or not he can still fight as well as he needs to to be a top fighter in his division
The thing is 95% of his fights are against sub standard fighters AND he takes on this bloke while talking trash about how he wants to beat Calzaghe... its filth mate. If he wants Calzaghe he should take on another top contender, Froch would be my pick for him.
Posted: 04 Nov 2007, 21:07
by razor7
P4P1 is right in this case with Mundine. Given his eye & the need to see if it will affect him Clavero, while substandard is fair enough. It's just that his career is littered with too many 'Claveros".It's like the boy who cried wolf.I'll give him one more chance. The next opponent must be credible.
Posted: 04 Nov 2007, 21:27
by thunderfromdownunder
in a perfect world, clazaghe would fight bute, and mundine and froch would fight for the right to face the winner.
Posted: 04 Nov 2007, 21:35
by toppity
thunderfromdownunder wrote:in a perfect world, clazaghe would fight bute, and mundine and froch would fight for the right to face the winner.
Calzaghe is already talking of moving up to light heavy to fight Hopkins or RJJ. He only has a little time left (his comment), so he is looking for the big bucks.
Posted: 04 Nov 2007, 22:06
by Marlin
toppity wrote:thunderfromdownunder wrote:in a perfect world, clazaghe would fight bute, and mundine and froch would fight for the right to face the winner.
Calzaghe is already talking of moving up to light heavy to fight Hopkins or RJJ. He only has a little time left (his comment), so he is looking for the big bucks.
He should have done that years ago...
Posted: 04 Nov 2007, 22:40
by p4p1
yes he has fought to many "world title" fights were the guy he fights shouldnt be in the top 15 his best wins have been echols(past his prime), green who may have had trouble making weight but it was still a 1 sided beating and soliman who i always thought was a bit small at 168 though it was a awesome performance from mundine however these opponents should not make him a dual world champion
Posted: 01 Dec 2007, 08:21
by this bloke
i think mundine is a bit unsure how his eye is gonna work out and wants to test it but just not against an opponent who can really hurt him after this one if he performs well and is confident with his eye we could see him take on a world class performer
Posted: 02 Dec 2007, 05:07
by Marlin
^But more likely we'll see him take on another scrub... but this time he might do it somewhere in Asia...
Posted: 11 Dec 2007, 03:50
by Brute
Many years ago Ring magazine did an article on the WBA, heading it "Why Bother Answering?"
Things have not changed much.
Posted: 11 Dec 2007, 03:52
by Brute
razor7 wrote:P4P1 is right in this case with Mundine. Given his eye & the need to see if it will affect him Clavero, while substandard is fair enough. It's just that his career is littered with too many 'Claveros".It's like the boy who cried wolf.I'll give him one more chance. The next opponent must be credible.
Clavero would have been "fair enough" for a non title fight. For a title defence it was a joke in very poor taste.
Posted: 11 Dec 2007, 05:01
by bollox
I for the life of me do not understand why Sydney people go to these ridiculous charades posing as alleged world title fights. Anyone with half a brain can find out about the quality of some of Mundine's opponents
Anyone know wtf is going on up there regarding these so called 'events' that draw crowds of 'ooooh i simply need to be seen at the event' out of the woodwork?

Posted: 11 Dec 2007, 05:38
by Brute
I do not know anybody who went to this farce. From the number of Rugby League people in the crowd I would say that corporations bought the tickets as presents to their people. In the hey day of boxing in Sydney at Sydney Stadium the real followers were in the bleachers, i.e, the cheap seats. There are no cheap seats now.
Posted: 11 Dec 2007, 08:53
by p4p1
as expected mundine flogged clavero but i did think he looked quite sharp
i hope he picks a worthy opponent for his next fight