Page 2 of 4
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 10:37
by Chambers2
JC, I could never support a foreigner over a Brit
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 10:43
by jamesmcdonnell
http://www.BS.com/index.php?m=show&id=11022
Check out this bullshit from Mundine, according to him 'calzaghe is not an aggressive fighter!"
WTF??! Ask Jeff Lacy how aggressive Calzaghe is mate.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 11:00
by Asterix
I'm supporting Joe! But I like Mikkel too, and I wish him all the best. Whatever the outcome, it should be really exciting for me.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 11:00
by Matt W
Calzaghe. Tend to favour Brits unless they are a) a dick or b) fighting one of my favourite fighters.
Nationality isn't that much of a factor for me.
I think Joe needs names on his record that reflect his talent. If he does lose and his legacy is tainted he can only really blame himself for not going after the big fights sooner.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 11:27
by n1ebf
not really understanding all the messages saying it will be better for boxing if Kessler wins.
it sounds like nonsense to me, if Joe's the best man, and I think he will be, whether he's 35 or whatever...in what way is that any worse for boxing than if Kessler wins?
exactly, it's not.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 11:28
by E
oliverfennell wrote:yiddo14 wrote:As a proud and patriotic ENGLISHman, I have no preference in this fight.
All I hope for is a cracking bout

Calzaghe was born in England
Yeah but he doesn't consider himself ENglish. I was born in Spain but am in no way Spanish......
Haven't we been through this question on a few other threads?
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 11:31
by Autobarn
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:not really understanding all the messages saying it will be better for boxing if Kessler wins.
it sounds like nonsense to me, if Joe's the best man, and I think he will be, whether he's 35 or whatever...in what way is that any worse for boxing than if Kessler wins?
exactly, it's not.
because Kessler will take on world class opponents most of the time in his subsequent fights, duh...
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 11:38
by oliverfennell
E wrote:oliverfennell wrote:yiddo14 wrote:As a proud and patriotic ENGLISHman, I have no preference in this fight.
All I hope for is a cracking bout

Calzaghe was born in England
Yeah but he doesn't consider himself ENglish. I was born in Spain but am in no way Spanish......
Haven't we been through this question on a few other threads?
I don't think it's of any consequence, either - I was just trying to gain him a bit of support from somebody who wishes to split the UK!
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 11:39
by lvlarc
As a proud Welshman, I am 100% behind Joe Calzaghe in the biggest fight of his career. All I ask is for a good clean fight with a fair result.
Calzaghe made weight with more than a lb to spare, whereas Kessler had to strip naked to make 168..
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 11:53
by THEBUTCH
Exactly, Autobarn. Once Kessler won his world title he's got down to business much, much quicker. Too many of Calzaghe's opponents have been appalling.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 11:57
by Max Molyneux
Kessler probably wanted to show off all his tattoos.
Calzaghe going to Asda after the weigh In.

Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 12:00
by Max Molyneux
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 12:10
by Goz
Joe could change his nickname to 'Skeletor' for this one.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 12:18
by Max Molyneux
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 12:20
by tony3
Calzaghe all the way partly because I'm British and partly because of the hateful, incessant stream of bile that Joe has to endure from morons world over.
Kessler's a great fighter though and I wish him well in the overall context of his career. When he's not fighting Calzaghe I'll be a firm supporter.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 12:28
by MightyWarrior
Yeah you can see Joe wasn't joking about starving himself was he..Kessler has a look of steel about him, his eyes look like he KNOWS he's going to win.
Good preview by Claude Abrams in BN today, he goes for JC on points, or maybe late stopage.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 12:31
by nickd
When did Calzaghe last stop anyone decent? He couldn't put Lacy away despite landing an astonishing amounth of punches. And he couldn't even drop Charles Brewer. A Calzaghe win surely has to be a decision I can't see him knocking Kessler out or stopping him but for a dodgy stoppage.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 14:25
by pundit
tony3 wrote:Calzaghe all the way partly because I'm British and partly because of the hateful, incessant stream of bile that Joe has to endure from morons world over.
Calzaghe got stick in large part due to his inadequate opposition, together with his constant bragging and announcements what great things he would do in the future -- and never did. Hence the bile was well deserved.
Just by taking this fight -- against his clear, one and only peer at 168 -- Calzaghe has done a lot to silence the critics. Whether he wins or loses.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 14:59
by Max Molyneux
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 14:59
by The Hawk
pundit wrote:tony3 wrote:Calzaghe all the way partly because I'm British and partly because of the hateful, incessant stream of bile that Joe has to endure from morons world over.
Calzaghe got stick in large part due to his inadequate opposition, together with his constant bragging and announcements what great things he would do in the future -- and never did. Hence the bile was well deserved.
Just by taking this fight -- against his clear, one and only peer at 168 -- Calzaghe has done a lot to silence the critics. Whether he wins or loses.
So has he silenced yourself then Pundit

......I remember you heavily debating if this fight would ever happen and here we our 1 day away.
It's going to be a great fight, I hope a classic to look back on.
For the record I'm going for Calzaghe to win, I reckon on points. I have always thought Calzaghe will have too much speed, movement and talent for Kessler, can't wait to see this one play out

Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 15:02
by pundit
The Hawk wrote:pundit wrote:tony3 wrote:Calzaghe all the way partly because I'm British and partly because of the hateful, incessant stream of bile that Joe has to endure from morons world over.
Calzaghe got stick in large part due to his inadequate opposition, together with his constant bragging and announcements what great things he would do in the future -- and never did. Hence the bile was well deserved.
Just by taking this fight -- against his clear, one and only peer at 168 -- Calzaghe has done a lot to silence the critics. Whether he wins or loses.
So has he silenced yourself then Pundit
That's right mate.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 15:08
by Max Molyneux
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 15:30
by nickd
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 15:32
by jamesmcdonnell
pundit wrote:The Hawk wrote:pundit wrote:
Calzaghe got stick in large part due to his inadequate opposition, together with his constant bragging and announcements what great things he would do in the future -- and never did. Hence the bile was well deserved.
Just by taking this fight -- against his clear, one and only peer at 168 -- Calzaghe has done a lot to silence the critics. Whether he wins or loses.
So has he silenced yourself then Pundit
That's right mate.
Fcku me! If we are to thank Calzaghe for anything, then we know the reason right here, right now.
Posted: 02 Nov 2007, 15:37
by The Hawk
jamesmcdonnell wrote:pundit wrote:The Hawk wrote:
So has he silenced yourself then Pundit
That's right mate.
Fcku me! If we are to thank Calzaghe for anything, then we know the reason right here, right now.

I think we have to thank Calzaghe alright!
How long winded did that all feel
After all that in the past Pundit, do you think Calzaghe wins?