Page 2 of 2
Posted: 27 Nov 2007, 15:55
by Spreadking
I like how Ricky says he has never run from any fighter.
I do remember that night he sexually molested Juan Urango to avoid being hit.
Baldomir isn't able to duplicate the holding and hitting that Hatton will bring to the ring.
Posted: 27 Nov 2007, 17:18
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Terry D wrote:Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Terry D wrote:
Taking one half each of a potentially great fighters career does not a great trainer make. Ray Leonard did most of his work with a coach whose name escapes me, Dundee was the fine tuner, but was that coach great? Is Pepe Correa?
Forbes-Hopkins had some nip and tuck rounds and Mayweather tells his charge they are going to steal it from him between rounds in a negative, "don't bother manner", and that is good work? Not in my book.
Floyd Senior did little for Oscar in my opinion. His in-fight corner work again left a lot to be desired and although he has worked with good names how many of those names moved on? Genius, if he was, is difficult but you work with it rather than walking away.
Do you think Floyd Senior is on a par with Manny? Steward trained Hearns from the start. Gave Holyfield the second Bowe fight. Turned Lewis into a different fighter, plus Lewis is also a great one. He worked with Moorer when Moorer was a decent fighter. He is currently getting Cintron performing above his level. Trained Breland. McCall, gave him the Lewis win in fact. A whole host of names testify for Steward, he can turn a big lump like Wlad into a more rounded fighter. He is far better as a trainer.
Floyd is a gem, only an idiot could go wrong with him. Floyd Senior and Roger are not outstanding trainers, their surname got them everything. Floyd could sack Roger tonight and still fight well, arguably he would be better placed as he won't have to worry about his uncle's behaviour.
Floyd does not seem to listen in the corner and when he does it is to Leonard and not Roger. You get a limited amount of words you can use and Roger uses half of them to say "mufferfooker" rather than impart advice.
Floyd also got himself through his biggest crisis.
I don't think a fighters born. The best fighters have learnt their trade from many a place. Mayweather Jr would not be the fighter he is today without Sr and Roger. A boxing family helps, they can impart all their knowledge and build on their failures. Floyd likely is not more naturallt talented than Roger, but he has ofcourse built his game to a higher level than Roger. Honestly there are many fighters with as good or better natural ability as Floyd, Zab Judah springs to mind.
The thing that mystyfys me is Floyd's 'I never watch boxing tapes' comment. True or False. Because Floyd sometimes looks like a carbon copy of the Argeninian defensive genius of the 70s Loche.
Rogers corner work may not be the best BUT cornerwork is only 1 part of a great trainer. Prepping a fighter and working on his weaknesses is another that I'm sure Roger does well.
What would you say was Floyds biggest crisis? Corley? Castillo (Broke ribs)?
I find it very interesting that the Mayweathers keep their REAL TRAINING behind closed doors. I suppose sparing maybe a good idea to keep there in case it exposes a weakness or 2.
How good is Steward? Recently I don't think hes been too good at all and maybe its that I'm sure hes great at teaching a few things but he always grabs the best talent and that makes it allot easier. Yes he had Hearns from the start but Kronk was packed with talent and Hearns was a freak of nature at 147-154. I think Steward maybe great at teaching powerful right handers and good 1-2 boxing but how good is he as a whole?
Stewards recent proteges are Wlad, Cintron, Harris and Taylor. All wonderfully talented but Taylor and Contron have performed very poorly recently and Wlad and Harris collapsed because of poor conditioning. Cintron was supposed to look terrible last time out and will probably lose to Williams next time.
So how good is Steward? It is hard to fail when you have a talent pool as deep as his. BUT Wlad and Lewis were already world champions. All he did for those fighters was to tell them to keep a tight guard and be careful not to get countered.
McGirt was touted as a top trainer a few years ago. Now hes been shown up to be pretty terrible. Trying to get Gatti to box against Mayweather helping Tarver lose his big 1 and trying to turn Brewster into a skilled boxer.
All in all I don't know how good the Mayweathers are as trainers, they could be amazing or they could have got lucky.
I find him very different than Locche. Locche was a compact little guy who would cover, block, stay in range then fire his own hooks off. Toney is cloest to him in recent years for me, only Toney does his best work with straighter shots when in his pomp.
Floyd was not born the way he was and his uncles, Jeff also, helped him, as did his dad, but he is the one who took their styles and synthesised them into something special.
I'm not sure how much Roger does, the guy seems all over the place and Floyd looks to be his own conditioning coach. Behind closed doors is when they do their sparring but the pad work hardly looks special.
Some trainers, Oliver Harrison over here, set-up a sequence of punches then give their fighters proper scope to hit them rather than him tapping the fighter. It is much better in my opinion than the current tapping vogue.
Stewards results speak for themselves in my opinion. He came in and turned McCall into heavyweight title holder. He then showed Lewis how to iron out his kinks, not just 1-2 but getting the hook off the 1-2, Lewis did this best against Morrison.
His gym may have been packed with talent but he must have impressed as the fighters elected to stay with him and went to his gym in the early days.
I think he improved Lewis a great deal and even managed to get some urgency into him between rounds at times.
Wlad he has done wonders for, keeping him in the Peter fight by showing him basic things, in other words holding.
Cintron looked poor last time but no one would have expected the power punching and tight hitting we got against Mathysse.
As a trainer his body of work is better than Roger or Floyd Senior's.
McGirt does seem overrated. People thought Gatti was Ali under McGirt but look at the level Gatti could box and jab at, above that he was made to look hopelessly inept against Floyd.
I thought Floyd's biggest crisis came when he damaged his hand, took a count and was plainly in trouble with 6 rounds or so left. He was tough that night, plus he was also tough in the fight with Augustus.
Floyd is a fighter, to use a phrase, right down to the souls of his boots.
Floyd does some things differently to Loche but some things were IDENTICLE. I'm new to Loche and haven't seen much of him but I was amazed to see how similar some of their moves were. Toney also shoulder rolls but I think Loche is far more similar, as if they took his moves down directly
If you watch 24/7 episode 2, at 1 stage you can see the padwork where Floyds throwing real punches, you can only see it in the background and its very brief. So they don't only do the pitter pat speed work
I think our Brit Pack of trainers are underrated - Calazage and Ingle are world class with the limited talent they have.
I never saw Mayweather-Hernandez
Posted: 27 Nov 2007, 17:21
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Spreadking wrote:I like how Ricky says he has never run from any fighter.
I do remember that night he sexually molested Juan Urango to avoid being hit.
Baldomir isn't able to duplicate the holding and hitting that Hatton will bring to the ring.
Ricky doesn't run in a fight, he just runs from Junior Witter
The real question is does Hatton really think all Mayweather is planning to back up, roll, and throw a few shots? He talks like he thinks Mayweather has no offensive plans of his own.
Posted: 28 Nov 2007, 08:32
by dbf
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Spreadking wrote:I like how Ricky says he has never run from any fighter.
I do remember that night he sexually molested Juan Urango to avoid being hit.
Baldomir isn't able to duplicate the holding and hitting that Hatton will bring to the ring.
Ricky doesn't run in a fight, he just runs from Junior Witter
The real question is does Hatton really think all Mayweather is planning to back up, roll, and throw a few shots? He talks like he thinks Mayweather has no offensive plans of his own.
Agreed. I think he is underestimating Mayweathers power, which could do some damage if he connects frequently
Posted: 28 Nov 2007, 08:50
by Southpaw Stylist
In my opinion Hatton like De La Hoya, doesn't seem to understand what razor sharp speed and timing does to someone's power.
When Hatton gets caught with a few right hands, Floyd's mindset will be "Hang on, I can catch this guy at will". His confidence will build, and then that's it, fight done.
I reckon we'll see a point where Hatton mentally stops trying.
Posted: 28 Nov 2007, 09:28
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
dbf wrote:Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Spreadking wrote:I like how Ricky says he has never run from any fighter.
I do remember that night he sexually molested Juan Urango to avoid being hit.
Baldomir isn't able to duplicate the holding and hitting that Hatton will bring to the ring.
Ricky doesn't run in a fight, he just runs from Junior Witter
The real question is does Hatton really think all Mayweather is planning to back up, roll, and throw a few shots? He talks like he thinks Mayweather has no offensive plans of his own.
Agreed. I think he is underestimating Mayweathers power, which could do some damage if he connects frequently
I think they are not only underestimating Mayweathers power but they are assuming Floyd will just back up and not be able to make his own offensive. By the sounds they are really expecting Floyd to just back up and wait to counter and not try to get his shots off first. Mayweather didn't fight backwards against Judah, Gatti or Mitchell he was on the offensive in those fights.
The biggest factor for Hatton in this fight is: can he move his head well enough in the way in, can he jab his way in, and can he maintain the pace for 12 rounds and not fade like he has recently.
Even if he can be perfect in all those categories whos to say Mayweather won't still beat him to the punch and control the fight by beating Hatton to the punch continously? Or Hatton simply may get outhustled on the inside just like Jirov was against Toney. Mayweather is fantastically defensively on the inside and has an excellent inside game himself.
Posted: 28 Nov 2007, 10:01
by Matt W
Would just like to put in my tuppence on the trainer issue.
I don't know a great deal about the training methods of the Mayweathers but I do know a lot about what makes a great coach. One of the key things is that the relationship is built around the athlete and their needs. The fact that the Mayweathers seem so keen to shout their mouths off about themselves automatically makes me question their approach to coaching.
On the pads question it seems comparable to the 'drill-based' approach to training in various sports. It has its place in developing technique but beyond that is limited as it does not adequately prepare for the realities of the competitive environment i.e. having to adapt and make decisions as opposed to going through a pre-determined routine. The ever-changing sports environment does not lend itself to a routine approach. I would hope that most of the training recognises this.
On how much someone like Steward adds - at the elite level there is relatively little that can be changed in an athlete. Years of training will have been done and habits formed. Technical and tactical adjustments can thus be the key impact a trainer can have at this stage, and the extent to which this can be achieved will be the largely influenced by the pliablility of the fighter in question. If you doubt how hard it is to change somebody's habits then try crossing your arms in the opposite way to how you have done it all your life. Or watch Ramsey's Kitchen Nightmares and see how many go back to poor ways of working despite being shown why they are failing.
For me Steward helps his charges to make the most of their abilities, often in a short space of time. IMO this makes him an exceptional coach.
Posted: 28 Nov 2007, 11:42
by MightyWarrior
Floyd has the reputation in the trade for always training like a demon. He's got the party boy rep, but he's deadly serious when it comes time to to get in shape.
I reckon he hits hard enough to drop Hatton if he walks on to one, especialy if it's one of those fast shots he doesn't see coming.
Oscar was definitely stunned enough to keep him honest when the smaller man connected, which says a lot.
Main worry for Ricky might be cuts, lets hope not.
Posted: 28 Nov 2007, 18:29
by Kilburn
What a cracking piece of telly that was.
Ricky's impression of Mayweathers padwork was hilarious. "Please hit me like that". Brilliant.
Posted: 28 Nov 2007, 20:10
by stujones
Oscar definately regressed under Floyd Snr IMO... Obviously the fighter has got to take most of the flack - but the only time he looked fat in his career was with Floyd Snr in his camp.
Oscar best was in his early days - was it Alcazzar? and Gill Clancy on board. He seemed better with Roach than under Floyd.
Have to say though, I was really impressed with Guzman vs Soto - he looks to have improved immensely under the tutorlidge of Floyd.
Posted: 28 Nov 2007, 23:53
by Colesy
Floyd uses Roger as he is family and trusts him. I could train Floyd and he would still win. He knows how to fight his way and thats it, he's not going to muck about with his style like ODLH has done. Floyd does what Floyd does and won;t be changing his style. Also, he obviously likes to surround himself with the brown tongue brigade.
Ricky is coming out of this 24/7 show as a star. His personality is top drawer and he has me in stitches with he impersonations and one liners. He also looks ready and edgy. His camp looks like a great place to be around. Terry D you must have a right laugh there.
I trust Ricky has been sparring with some speed merchants. Floyds speed will befuddle Ricky early but I think Ricky is a natural fighter and he will find a way to hurt Floyd and get his respect. Looking forward to this one.
Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 04:55
by dbf
stujones wrote:Oscar definately regressed under Floyd Snr IMO... Obviously the fighter has got to take most of the flack - but the only time he looked fat in his career was with Floyd Snr in his camp.
Oscar best was in his early days - was it Alcazzar? and Gill Clancy on board. He seemed better with Roach than under Floyd.
Have to say though, I was really impressed with Guzman vs Soto - he looks to have improved immensely under the tutorlidge of Floyd.
I don't think he regressed under mayweather. The Vargas performance was excellent, he had a very good showing against Hopkins, and a good comeback win over Mayorga.
As Floyd Snr stated for the Sturm fight, he did his part as Oscar went the full 12, but it was his strength/conditioning coach and Oscar himself who was to blame for the pudgy appearance.
Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 05:01
by dbf
MightyWarrior wrote:Floyd has the reputation in the trade for always training like a demon. He's got the party boy rep, but he's deadly serious when it comes time to to get in shape.
I reckon he hits hard enough to drop Hatton if he walks on to one, especialy if it's one of those fast shots he doesn't see coming.
Oscar was definitely stunned enough to keep him honest when the smaller man connected, which says a lot.
Main worry for Ricky might be cuts, lets hope not.
I think Floyds most lethal punch will be his straight left/right to the body. Its quick and hard to block plus can take it out of Ricky. Roy Jones had success with this punch as did Calzaghe versus Kessler.
Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 06:04
by Roars Like Me
Is it not a case of Floyd not giving anything away?
I recall watching Lennox in public workouts and he was very slow and light hitting on the pads.
Obviously he was nothing like that in the ring.
Toney was average in sparring and turned it on in the ring(not so much recently it has to be said).
There has to be an element of not leaving your best work in the gym.
Floyd is clever bloke and he's knows what he's doing and he gives the impression that he wants to on camera.
Even down to the 'brittle hands' routine that he is playing at the moment.
If he can't intimidate Hatton(as Hatton has already said) with his promotion of the fight with Ricky, he, in my mind is trying another angle here and Hatton has bitten. He's jumped straight on the 'Why's Floyd talking about his hands so much', 'I hope he isn't going to use it as an excuse' etc etc.
There is many ways to get under someone's skin and this is just another way.
I have to say I want Ricky to win but it's going to be a close call.
Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 06:10
by stujones
dbf wrote:stujones wrote:Oscar definately regressed under Floyd Snr IMO... Obviously the fighter has got to take most of the flack - but the only time he looked fat in his career was with Floyd Snr in his camp.
Oscar best was in his early days - was it Alcazzar? and Gill Clancy on board. He seemed better with Roach than under Floyd.
Have to say though, I was really impressed with Guzman vs Soto - he looks to have improved immensely under the tutorlidge of Floyd.
I don't think he regressed under mayweather. The Vargas performance was excellent, he had a very good showing against Hopkins, and a good comeback win over Mayorga.
As Floyd Snr stated for the Sturm fight, he did his part as Oscar went the full 12, but it was his strength/conditioning coach and Oscar himself who was to blame for the pudgy appearance.
Personally, I don't think the Vargas fight was a particularly good showing... Yeah, cracking fight and he showed alot of heart there - but some folks had Vargas up at the start of the 10th. It was very close. I think DLH used a bad tactics that night - should have used his superior boxing/handspeed a lot more. He's a different class to Vargas, but didn't show it that night.
Similarly for Hopkins - again braver than I expected, did better fighting that way than I expected. But again, he didn't really try to use his speed/boxing untill he was pretty exhausted and by then it was too late. Why or why did he try and take it to Bernard. He could have won that fight if he would have just boxed.
He did do well in the Mosley rematch and vs Mayorga... no doubting that.
Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 11:18
by Chambers2
Kilburn wrote:What a cracking piece of telly that was.
Ricky's impression of Mayweathers padwork was hilarious. "Please hit me like that". Brilliant.
Exactly what I was thinking.
I've thoroughly enjoyed both shows, Ricky, Kerry and Billy are piss funny. I wonder if the yanks think the same? I was creased up at the padwork impression
Hattons gonna take him apart, Mayweathers making his excuses already oooh my back hurts, ooh my hand hurts, ooh my elbows giving me some jip.
Hattons a machine and hes going to rough Mayweather up and run him over with constant educated pressure. Everyone knows Mayweathers hands ain't the best and he doesn't like to load up on his punches because of it, but hes gonna have to if Ricky can close him down and corner him regularly. Mayweathers hand problems should be more of a worry than Rickys cuts problem IMO. I can this fight being like watching Wild E Coyote chasing Roadrunner round the ring.