Page 2 of 2

Posted: 04 Dec 2007, 06:55
by Lenny
I'm with you Max, even in the last round when Power jumped all over Napa in the corner he still could hardly hit him and the telling shots were the counters coming back.

Posted: 04 Dec 2007, 07:53
by oliverfennell
theMONT wrote:Yeah i was at ringside, no i was'nt there booing, no i'm not a swinger, and the only reason nappa's got the the title is because power gave it up through injury ? ? cant beleive you all think the scores were fair ? i think the judges were looking at nappa's knob for 12 rounds along with all you lot ! watch the fight again turn the sound off so you dont get influenced by the crawly bumlick jim wat, score it on punches landed in target area and you'l all see power wins by 3 rounds......
You can't believe "we all" thought the scores were fair. There's a clue in what you just said - you're opinion is in the minority, and while you're entitled to disagree with the verdict, the fact you are a lone voice suggests the judges probably got it right.

Have to agree the commentary was a bit pro-Napa, though, and I had it even after six. But it was all Napa in the second half. Aggression is only good if you can LAND punches.

Posted: 04 Dec 2007, 08:00
by DavidPayne
is that in inches or centrimetres?

I admire the gumption of the fella that brought that up. I didn't see the fight, apparentley him and Wogan are fronting Points of View this week.