Page 2 of 3

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 12:52
by Sammy Mendelson
Figure Skating - China

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 12:54
by Dirk Kelly
Hardhitters11 wrote:basketball...US...Just a guess.....Dont even know if they have that at the olympics...
Yeah they do, and like with tennis pro's play. Does anyone know why that is?

Basketball - Greece?

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 12:54
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Nope, but close


come on guys, its like you dont want a free back-rub!!!

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 12:56
by Chambers2
Hockey - India

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 12:56
by Khaosai-Galaxy
*sighs*

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 12:57
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Give up??

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 12:58
by SticknMove
Bobsleigh - Jamaica

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 12:58
by Dirk Kelly
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:*sighs*
And Sammy's table tennis guess was wrong too?

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 12:58
by Chambers2
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Give up??
Yup

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 12:58
by Khaosai-Galaxy
SticknMove wrote:Bobsleigh - Jamaica
almost!

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 12:59
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Dirk Kelly wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:*sighs*
And Sammy's table tennis guess was wrong too?
Half wrong

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 13:00
by Dirk Kelly
I give up, finish at 5, so put us out our misery please? :TU:

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 13:04
by Khaosai-Galaxy
China and Boxing, weirdly enough


they are fornicating mad for it, apparently

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 13:07
by Dirk Kelly
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:China and Boxing, weirdly enough


they are effing mad for it, apparently
Cheers :TU:

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 13:09
by johnswan1
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:China and Boxing, weirdly enough


they are effing mad for it, apparently
All that guessing for a bullshit answer. Show us your source. China won their first ever medal for boxing at the Athens Olympics but I doubt this was the most watched event. Proof please.

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 13:52
by Hardhitters11
I got my answer of a search engine as well....useless fuckers!!

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 14:11
by sweetscience
i dont believe 900k in UK

there is only 25 million homes

thats one in 25 more or less

and you have to be a sky subsriber to get it

NO CHANCE

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 15:30
by Khaosai-Galaxy
johnswan1 wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:China and Boxing, weirdly enough


they are effing mad for it, apparently
All that guessing for a bullshit answer. Show us your source. China won their first ever medal for boxing at the Athens Olympics but I doubt this was the most watched event. Proof please.
this ones a lark, isn't he lads?

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 16:21
by don't call it a comeback
900k is a huge number but it is feasible.

Remember the sky subscriber base has grown significantly and now numbers about 9m households. To give you an example of disposable income, well over a million of those households pay for sky in more than one room. So it is possible - and certainly there was a huge buzz about this fight in the week running up to it.

If you'd asked me two months ago I'd have guessed about 350k, if you'd asked me on the night I might have said 500k....900k is huge and Ricky would have taken a big chunk of that if true.

The amounts Ricky and Joe have made over the last couple of years - Ricky from tv, Joe from live gates, is pretty impressive.

At the same time, British champ level fighters are probably earning less than any time in the last ten years.

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 18:50
by johnswan1
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
johnswan1 wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:China and Boxing, weirdly enough


they are effing mad for it, apparently
All that guessing for a bullshit answer. Show us your source. China won their first ever medal for boxing at the Athens Olympics but I doubt this was the most watched event. Proof please.
this ones a lark, isn't he lads?
No "he's" not. But you've proved you're the clown of the forum with comments like this that only you yourself are stupid enough to believe.

Posted: 12 Dec 2007, 20:12
by stujones
don't call it a comeback wrote:900k is a huge number but it is feasible.

Remember the sky subscriber base has grown significantly and now numbers about 9m households. To give you an example of disposable income, well over a million of those households pay for sky in more than one room. So it is possible - and certainly there was a huge buzz about this fight in the week running up to it.

If you'd asked me two months ago I'd have guessed about 350k, if you'd asked me on the night I might have said 500k....900k is huge and Ricky would have taken a big chunk of that if true.

The amounts Ricky and Joe have made over the last couple of years - Ricky from tv, Joe from live gates, is pretty impressive.

At the same time, British champ level fighters are probably earning less than any time in the last ten years.
How much did Tyson vs Francis do in the UK - I always thought it topped the million.

Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 04:57
by Khaosai-Galaxy
johnswan1 wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
johnswan1 wrote: All that guessing for a bullshit answer. Show us your source. China won their first ever medal for boxing at the Athens Olympics but I doubt this was the most watched event. Proof please.
this ones a lark, isn't he lads?
No "he's" not. But you've proved you're the clown of the forum with comments like this that only you yourself are stupid enough to believe.
ha ha, i can see i'm going to have some fun with you, dear

Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 08:56
by Mario
900,000 sounds absolutely huge! Im no maths whizz, but that would mean 1 in every 25 homes in the whole country bought it and all of those would have to be sky subscribers. And i know where i watched there was 15-20 of us all watching the same tv, and many people ive spoken to since did the same. By my very rough estimates that would probably just less than half the country watched a minority sport at 4am on a PPV channel. Mad eh?!

Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 09:01
by Ted
Mario wrote:900,000 sounds absolutely huge! Im no maths whizz, but that would mean 1 in every 25 homes in the whole country bought it and all of those would have to be sky subscribers. And i know where i watched there was 15-20 of us all watching the same tv, and many people ive spoken to since did the same. By my very rough estimates that would probably just less than half the country watched a minority sport at 4am on a PPV channel. Mad eh?!
why not 900k?

18 million watched the snooker final in 1985, also quite a few thousand pubs would be showing it

Posted: 13 Dec 2007, 09:08
by johnswan1
Mario wrote:900,000 sounds absolutely huge! Im no maths whizz, but that would mean 1 in every 25 homes in the whole country bought it and all of those would have to be sky subscribers. And i know where i watched there was 15-20 of us all watching the same tv, and many people ive spoken to since did the same. By my very rough estimates that would probably just less than half the country watched a minority sport at 4am on a PPV channel. Mad eh?!
You are dead right - you're no maths whizz. Sorry to spoil the party but nowhere near half the country tuned in to see the fight. Even IF 900,000 buys is true (and I don't believe for a second that it is), I suspect that would work out at around 3-4m max viewers. This would be approx 4-6% of the population, a very long way from half.