Just how good is Amir Khan?? Another Leonard or Audley??
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

More Danny Williams than Audley Harrison.
Seems to be best in UK by a fair bit & has some talent, but a style and chin that will stop him passing a certain level.
He banged out a guy who we realised afterwards was shopworn to f#ck with no chin left. Fairplay-- he got him out of there which is exactly what he should of done, but Lawton and Earl offered no resistence whatsoever and people are getting excited.
Last time somebody stood up to Amir he was a very shaky vulerable looking amateur without the vest or headgear on.
Seems to be best in UK by a fair bit & has some talent, but a style and chin that will stop him passing a certain level.
He banged out a guy who we realised afterwards was shopworn to f#ck with no chin left. Fairplay-- he got him out of there which is exactly what he should of done, but Lawton and Earl offered no resistence whatsoever and people are getting excited.
Last time somebody stood up to Amir he was a very shaky vulerable looking amateur without the vest or headgear on.
Khan is still young enough that you’d think his punch resistance will develop some as he has a few more fights. He might not be granite-jawed, but I’m willing to bet he’ll be able to take a good shot when they decide the time is right to move him up in class.
He’s still developing – that’s the key issue – it’s not as if he’s never going to get any better than he currently is. As others have said, even De la Hoya was floored by journeymen early on, and aside from a B-Hop shot to the liver, he doesn’t go down much now does he….
He’s still developing – that’s the key issue – it’s not as if he’s never going to get any better than he currently is. As others have said, even De la Hoya was floored by journeymen early on, and aside from a B-Hop shot to the liver, he doesn’t go down much now does he….
What bugs me if that he bangs out Thaxton now, some people on this site will say he's too old, shot etc rather than giving Khan the credit he deserves.overhand_right wrote:More Danny Williams than Audley Harrison.
Seems to be best in UK by a fair bit & has some talent, but a style and chin that will stop him passing a certain level.
He banged out a guy who we realised afterwards was shopworn to f#ck with no chin left. Fairplay-- he got him out of there which is exactly what he should of done, but Lawton and Earl offered no resistence whatsoever and people are getting excited.
Last time somebody stood up to Amir he was a very shaky vulerable looking amateur without the vest or headgear on.
-
Southpaw Stylist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1484
- Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 04:50
We'll know that as soon as Thaxton steps in the ring. If Thaxton doesn't LOOK shot then no one would consider him shot.Wax On wrote:What bugs me if that he bangs out Thaxton now, some people on this site will say he's too old, shot etc rather than giving Khan the credit he deserves.overhand_right wrote:More Danny Williams than Audley Harrison.
Seems to be best in UK by a fair bit & has some talent, but a style and chin that will stop him passing a certain level.
He banged out a guy who we realised afterwards was shopworn to f#ck with no chin left. Fairplay-- he got him out of there which is exactly what he should of done, but Lawton and Earl offered no resistence whatsoever and people are getting excited.
Last time somebody stood up to Amir he was a very shaky vulerable looking amateur without the vest or headgear on.
Many things come into the equation:
1) How active has Thaxton been?
2) Did he win his last bout?
3) Is he a big puncher?
4) How hard has he trained?
Etc.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
Southpaw Stylist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1484
- Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 04:50
The way that anyone who has studied physical education to at least GCSE level does...darkstar81 wrote:How are you distinguishing between skills and abilities?Southpaw Stylist wrote: Khan as an amateur was basically a buzzsaw who hit too hard and quick for his opponents. His ABILITIES are amazing. Skills average, imo.
Abilities = Things that you are born with
Skills = Things you are taught
Khan's abilities are amazing - He's got great speed, power, h/e co-ordination, reflexes etc...
Khan's boxing skills are average - He has a good jab, a good right hand, a good hook. However, they are all offensive skills. His defence consists of reliance upon reflexes, therefore it is not a skill. He doesn't have great ring craft or many technical boxing skills. He just does what he does.
Trust me, I know enough boxing to know that I am right on this one.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
He mean the Sprott one.Terry D wrote:You mean apart from the Williams knockdown Audley got up from?Max Molyneux wrote:Wouldn't go as far to say a Leonard yet but he ain't an Audley.
He did win when stepping up for the commonwealth title and when knocked down got up unlike Harrison.
Williams Is more a puncher while Sprott and Limond aren't known to bang.
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

Not sure it's that simple mate to be honest. Reflexes are an abilty you're born with alright, but to me it's quite a skill to be able to use them as effectively as say Naseem did.Southpaw Stylist wrote:The way that anyone who has studied physical education to at least GCSE level does...darkstar81 wrote:How are you distinguishing between skills and abilities?Southpaw Stylist wrote: Khan as an amateur was basically a buzzsaw who hit too hard and quick for his opponents. His ABILITIES are amazing. Skills average, imo.
Abilities = Things that you are born with
Skills = Things you are taught
Khan's abilities are amazing - He's got great speed, power, h/e co-ordination, reflexes etc...
Khan's boxing skills are average - He has a good jab, a good right hand, a good hook. However, they are all offensive skills. His defence consists of reliance upon reflexes, therefore it is not a skill. He doesn't have great ring craft or many technical boxing skills. He just does what he does.
Trust me, I know enough boxing to know that I am right on this one.
As for Amir's defences, he'll obviously have been working on tightening up his skills in this area since Limond, but we aint had much chance to see an improvement yet and may not get chance to until he makes a significant step up in class.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45233
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

-
Southpaw Stylist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1484
- Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 04:50
But you're bound to say that, you're a blatant Khan defender.Wax On wrote:Something learnt - certainly not by the time you're 21 IMO.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Zab Judah has great abilities (natural speed and power), Floyd Mayweather has great skills to go with them, (brilliant defence, positioning, timing, and ring generalship).
Savvy?
I suggest you watch the Pernell Whitaker/Sugar Ray Leonard/and another host of young fighters I could name who had SKILLS and savvy (although I don't agree that it is just savvy) as soon as they went professional.
Khan is a crowd fighter. He gets sucked into the hype and lacks the brains to do any different IMO...I am a fan of his, but I can distinguish between a good technician and a good athlete. What's more is, he isn't being taught this things as far as I know. I don't rate Harrison's training ability.
With Mayweather, he's had that excellent schooling from his dad and uncles, something passed on log enough that he became the best at it. That correctness, to go with the raw talent.
I think Khan's raw talent is very big. I can see him picking up a world title. Whether he becomes a real champ or gets bombed out early in his reign I'm not yet sure of. Depends what he picks up along the way.
I think Khan's raw talent is very big. I can see him picking up a world title. Whether he becomes a real champ or gets bombed out early in his reign I'm not yet sure of. Depends what he picks up along the way.
There's also plenty of fighters who pick these things up as their career progresses, BHOP for example.Southpaw Stylist wrote:But you're bound to say that, you're a blatant Khan defender.Wax On wrote:Something learnt - certainly not by the time you're 21 IMO.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Zab Judah has great abilities (natural speed and power), Floyd Mayweather has great skills to go with them, (brilliant defence, positioning, timing, and ring generalship).
Savvy?
I suggest you watch the Pernell Whitaker/Sugar Ray Leonard/and another host of young fighters I could name who had SKILLS and savvy (although I don't agree that it is just savvy) as soon as they went professional.
Ultimately only time will tell for Khan, so it will be interesting to read both of our comments back in time. I'm looking forward to seeing how he develops. And you may be right about Oliver too, but again it's a chicken and an egg situation. All the best trainers were once unproven too. It's not just Khan's reputation that is on the line. Good luck to them both!!
-
Southpaw Stylist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1484
- Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 04:50
Exactly. Khan's "schooling" is basically being picked up now. He didn't pick up any valid schooling as an amateur and that's why he still looks like an amateur.Autobarn wrote:With Mayweather, he's had that excellent schooling from his dad and uncles, something passed on log enough that he became the best at it. That correctness, to go with the raw talent.
Khan is basically a tremendously fast amateur who happened to turn pro.
I think that last comment is a bit redundant. The lad's an excellent pro thus far for his age and experience - gve him credit. He is still learning and is vocal about that. Against Limmond his hands were too low, against Earl, they were high and tight. By the way, from his last fight Id say his hook has developed quite a bit more than just good, it looked excellent. His boxing skills are being developed all the time and it showed in his last fight. He is not as wayward as he was, showed a better defence and in terms of offence, was more accurate, efficient and powerful. The lad has the sufficient skills, talant and desire to learn and win, in order to have a good crack at the world at some point in the near future.Southpaw Stylist wrote:Exactly. Khan's "schooling" is basically being picked up now. He didn't pick up any valid schooling as an amateur and that's why he still looks like an amateur.Autobarn wrote:With Mayweather, he's had that excellent schooling from his dad and uncles, something passed on log enough that he became the best at it. That correctness, to go with the raw talent.
Khan is basically a tremendously fast amateur who happened to turn pro.
I'd the say the gap between Leonard and Audley is a rather a large one so to say Amir will probably be judged as somewhere in-between is pretty accurate!
The question marks over Amir's chin are making his career all the more exciting I feel.
I guess he'll win a world title of some description but where he goes from there I'm not sure, it will depend if he develops at world level in the way that Hatton did.
When Ricky was struggling with Magee I figured his main assets wouldn't be transferable to premier world level - i.e struggling with Eamon Magee doesn't translate to beating Kostya Tszyu. But he did.
Not having a pop at Mr Magee there by the way!
The question marks over Amir's chin are making his career all the more exciting I feel.
I guess he'll win a world title of some description but where he goes from there I'm not sure, it will depend if he develops at world level in the way that Hatton did.
When Ricky was struggling with Magee I figured his main assets wouldn't be transferable to premier world level - i.e struggling with Eamon Magee doesn't translate to beating Kostya Tszyu. But he did.
Not having a pop at Mr Magee there by the way!
-
StepinFetchit
- Heavyweight

Mwhahahahaha.....some of u want to even dream that Khan will ever be talked about along side the likes of SRL?
Yet a lot of Fannys were jumping out their cots back when Mayweather was fighting and beating the likes of an unbeaten Corrales and some in the know were comparing him to SRL.
As long as Fwank keeps Khan fighting Euro bums and hand picked cans he will look good to some of you.
Khan has no chin and i can wait to see him get KTFO.
Yet a lot of Fannys were jumping out their cots back when Mayweather was fighting and beating the likes of an unbeaten Corrales and some in the know were comparing him to SRL.
As long as Fwank keeps Khan fighting Euro bums and hand picked cans he will look good to some of you.
Khan has no chin and i can wait to see him get KTFO.
Last edited by StepinFetchit on 19 Dec 2007, 14:47, edited 1 time in total.
Lets face it, any fighter can get caught by a perfect shot - that occasion when the aim is pure and the chin arrives at exactly the point of maximum extension, possibly with the struck fighter providing added force by dint of his own forward momentum. I think the issue with Khan against Limond was not so much whether he was chinny as whether he had properly thought through his attacking, come forward style and the implications of his poor defence.Asterix wrote:Ricky Hatton's chin didn't look great when he was floored by Mayweather, but perhaps it was just because it was a good shot? Same with Amir Khan getting floored by Limond. Does Ricky Hatton also have a suspect chin?
Just some food for thought.
Next fight out and it was clear that he had started to make the necessary adjustments.
How good will he eventually be? That is a monster call to make - at the moment he is in a tough division - the current titlists Casamayor, Diaz and Diaz are all great fighters, whilst Nate Campbell and Mike Katsidis are already around and there is the probability that Joan Guzman will move up soon. Khan needs time before I would be keen on him fighting that calibre of fighter just yet. Indeed, given that he is big for the weight, his best prospects would lie in the light-welter division, where he would have great, winnable matches with the likes of Junior Witter, Malignaggi, Torres and Hopkins.
