Page 2 of 3
Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 12:04
by Spud
Terry D wrote:
Read it, replied, second reply got skipped. It is hardly groundbreaking news.
Yet again in my view you deflect the issues.
Hauser highlights a number of areas which are a cause for concern - for you to deflect those issues by stating "hardly ground breaking news" really typifies yours and others attitude.
Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 12:14
by rhino222
if the whole situation is 'no big deal' ... then why is the article there !!
obviously we need to understand that SO are slightly linked to FA who were snubbed in what was the biggest fight of rickys career and a money spinner for fighter, team and promoter alike !!
so...are sour grapes the issue here?
but i know what happens to premiership stars when they 'sell on' cup final tickets etc !!
Twinkle Toes wrote:You've touted tickets yourself Spud, so although your stand is admirable, it is also very patronising.
I disagree with what has gone on with the Hatton/Mayweather allocation, but honestly why are some people on this forum looking at it with such wide eyed innocence?
Especially the like's of Spud and Rhino, who are far from whiter than white when it comes to putting their hand in their pockets to pay for a boxing ticket.
Pair of cúnts.
as for this comment twinkle toes.... dont tar me with that brush !! and the only person who can rightfully call me a pudendum is my ex wife and she deserved every marvellous second of it !!!

Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 12:32
by fatton
You are irrelevant in all situations.
As someone mentioned earlier this simply comes down to supply and demand. Is what went on right and moral, no. Is what went on inevitable, yes.
It's simply the way of the world and there are bigger issues in the world which could undoubtedly benefit from your righteous attention than simply having a pop at Hatton at every opportunity like some kind of bunny boiling, jilted stalker.
Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 13:11
by Big Pussy
rhino222 wrote:but i know what happens to premiership stars when they 'sell on' cup final tickets etc !!
Rhino. Here's the score as I understand it.
Touting is illegal in the football industry and was made so to fight hooliganism. Touting will be illegal for events at the 2012 Games based on terrorism threats.
Touting is legal for everything else. Supply and demand dictate prices- if mugs want to pay hundreds of pounds over the face value- that's their choice.
Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 13:12
by Sammy Mendelson
I haven't read Hauser's article. It is hardly a revelation that people look out for themselves in boxing. It is one of the most, if not the most, selfish sport in the world.
Spud, you are acting without class. I would argue that the fact you were dropped like a hot potato (get it?) from being a peripheral member of "Team Hatton" has fuelled an unjustified bias.
Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 14:02
by StepinFetchit
rhino222 wrote:if the whole situation is 'no big deal' ... then why is the article there !!
obviously we need to understand that SO are slightly linked to FA who were snubbed in what was the biggest fight of rickys career and a money spinner for fighter, team and promoter alike !!
so...are sour grapes the issue here?
but i know what happens to premiership stars when they 'sell on' cup final tickets etc !!
Twinkle Toes wrote:You've touted tickets yourself Spud, so although your stand is admirable, it is also very patronising.
I disagree with what has gone on with the Hatton/Mayweather allocation, but honestly why are some people on this forum looking at it with such wide eyed innocence?
Especially the like's of Spud and Rhino, who are far from whiter than white when it comes to putting their hand in their pockets to pay for a boxing ticket.
Pair of cúnts.
as for this comment twinkle toes.... dont tar me with that brush !! and the only person who can rightfully call me a pudendum is my ex wife and she deserved every marvellous second of it !!!

From a perspective of a normal boxing fan that does not claim to have "insider knowledge" ect ect, i must say the first thing that came to mind reading this and the fact SPUDLEY is taking the moral high ground made me think WOULD SPUDLEY BE NOW TAKING THE STANCE OF A MEARE BOXING FAN THAT IS QUESTIONING TEAM HATTONS MORALS ABOUT MAKING EXTRA MONEY FROM HIS FANS IF FIGHT ACADEMY PROMOTED AND PROFITED FROM THE MAYWEATHER BOUT????
Regarding the scalping/ touting/ brokering that is being addressed by the author of this thread.....this should be no shock, especially to the moronic Hatton fans that fuelled this whole episode.
I read on every boxing board Hatton fanatics booking air & hotel tickets before the fight tickets even went on sale, then comming and crying that when the tickets did go on sale, even though they pressed dial the minute they did they could not get through to purchase, then they got directed to sites where they could get a flight, hotel, boxing ticket package deal like magic.
Then it was announced that they would be showing the fight via closed circuit in bars ect around vegas.....and the dumb fookers still went over their to watch this missmatch on a big screen.
I have heard of people from here going over to vegas and buying fake tickets from touts, getting ripped off then going and spending thousands of Dollars more on another ticket.
Basically the Hatton bum boys voted with their feet to be taken up the a$$....and they loved it.
Also it is obvious that GBP are a bunch of slick MF'ers that will a$$ rape fans.
Ricky Hatton and his team are the biggest frauds in British boxing.
Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 14:25
by Sammy Mendelson
StepinFetchit wrote:Basically the Hatton bum boys voted with their feet to be taken up the a$$....and they loved it.
The key point in your post is that "they loved it". I have not heard those who went to Las Vegas complaining. Just because you and I don't like getting "taken up the a$$", as you put it, doesn't mean other people are similarly minded.
If people are happy to be "taken up the a$$" good luck to them and those doing the f*cking.
Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 14:26
by StepinFetchit
Sammy Mendelson wrote:StepinFetchit wrote:Basically the Hatton bum boys voted with their feet to be taken up the a$$....and they loved it.
The key point in your post is that "they loved it". I have not heard those who went to Las Vegas complaining. Just because you and I don't like getting "taken up the a$$", as you put it, doesn't mean other people are similarly minded.
If people are happy to be "taken up the a$$" good luck to them and those doing the f*cking.
Yes i agree, can we also agree that makes them a bunch of moronic f^gs.
Posted: 29 Dec 2007, 14:33
by Sammy Mendelson
StepinFetchit wrote:can we also agree that makes them a bunch of moronic f^gs.
No. They are not necessarily moronic. It all depends on their financial situation. If they could afford to pay for the tickets without adversely affecting themselves and their dependents, they are not moronic. Metaphorical f^gs, no doubt, but not all f^gs are moronic and few f^gs have economic difficulties.
Posted: 30 Dec 2007, 05:16
by Lightsoot
Very interesting from Hauser and, whether you care or not, it reflects poorly on the Hatton's. Maybe some of Ricky's loyal fans who missed out on tickets for Hatton-Mayweather, or who paid well over the odds for a ticket will reconsider putting their hands in their pockets next time Hatton fights.
Posted: 31 Dec 2007, 05:26
by dookus
have you paid that bet yet, lirva
Posted: 31 Dec 2007, 05:42
by jamesmcdonnell
Ben Carey wrote:Very interesting from Hauser and, whether you care or not, it reflects poorly on the Hatton's. Maybe some of Ricky's loyal fans who missed out on tickets for Hatton-Mayweather, or who paid well over the odds for a ticket will reconsider putting their hands in their pockets next time Hatton fights.
Have to say I agree. I think this reflects poorly on team Hatton, as the ticket scalping amounts to a con job, where the ticket prices are basically false, given that they are in the main being sold on to middle men.
Lest we forget, it's the fans who make up a sizeable amount of the money which enables purses to be paid, even in the TV age.
Posted: 31 Dec 2007, 06:42
by Autobarn
I think they can't resist making a monkey out of the fans. I feel ripped off enough from paying for the Maussa, Collazo and Urango fights on PPV. The travelling fans seeminly are being exploited for their loyalty. Vs Urango, it was like we were just paying for Ricky's presence along, like he didn't even have to "fight" to justify ppl shelling out. Billy Graham told us we all should be "grateful," even though he has nowt to do with tickets.
Ultimately, I think Hatton has severe limitations especially in the $ division 147-lbs, is a few years past his best, and feels the urgency to squeeze all the money he can out of every bout. All this talk last year of early retirement, 2 or 3 more fights, the suspicion (after Urango) that he's maybe damaged goods. When he goes into another PPV fight, like Cotto perhaps, it will all be over and he won't be able to do it anymore.
Only joking. Ricky's a man of the people. He has a pint with his fans. How muh more man of the people can you get?
Posted: 31 Dec 2007, 06:49
by Wales
I bought a $1000 ticket at face value (indirectly) from the ballot. That cost £640. $1000 at a 2.0 exchange rate (which was the exchange rate when I got the ticket) obviously equates to £500. However, should the exchange rate have fallen to 1.60 then the ticket value would have been $1024. Perhaps the 30% mark up was advised to them incase of interest rate drop? Especially considering the exchange rate is currently at its highest.
Or perhaps they wanted to make up a little more cash, after all he's risking his life getting in the ring.
Was my ticket overpriced, well, even at face Value - YES. Was I happy to pay that money to be in the arena? Hell YES, what an experience.
Regardless, isnt the real issue here with Golden boy, and not "team Hatton".
Spud, during the castillo fight I didnt see you saying "no no, I dont want a free ticket (or two), even though im just a change re-arranger / sweeper upper"
Posted: 31 Dec 2007, 14:30
by chris s
Don't see what the problem is. If you don't like prices don't buy.
Buy tickets for major concerts and by the time you pay booking fees, service charge, cc fees and post it is 20% more than the ticket.
Posted: 31 Dec 2007, 15:14
by Sammy Mendelson
chris s wrote:Don't see what the problem is. If you don't like prices don't buy.
Exactly. People are acting like the punters were forced to buy the tickets at gun point. The simple concept of Market Forces is clearly beyond Spud and his ilk.
Posted: 31 Dec 2007, 15:18
by StepinFetchit
Sammy Mendelson wrote:chris s wrote:Don't see what the problem is. If you don't like prices don't buy.
Exactly. People are acting like the punters were forced to buy the tickets at gun point. The simple concept of Market Forces is clearly beyond Spud and his ilk.
SPUD don't give 2 fooks, he was just using this artical as propaganda because he got dumped AGAIN.
Posted: 31 Dec 2007, 15:25
by banjo
ive bought tickets for concerts and fights and sold them for more than they are worth its called making money
Posted: 31 Dec 2007, 15:49
by Sammy Mendelson
banjo wrote:ive bought tickets for concerts and fights and sold them for more than they are worth its called making money
You've accidentally stumbled on the key point people are missing. You stated
"ive bought tickets for concerts and fights and sold them for more than they are worth". You haven't. They are
worth what people will pay for them. if that happens to be more than the face value of said item sobeit.
In this instance, there appears to be a strong likelihood that some form of tax avoidance (rather than evasion) has been entered into by the various parties, but that is another matter.
Posted: 31 Dec 2007, 19:11
by twenty six
I got my tickets in the same way as Wales.
I knew that £640 did not equal $1000 but I don't consider myself ripped off at all.
Due to a family issue suffered by my friend I ended up with two spare and put a thread up here.
The abuse I got made me ask for the moderators to take the thread down.
They went to a good home and the purchaser didn't feel ripped off one bit.
For major fights this practice has always existed - it's simply being highlighted by Hauser - his motivation ? Not sure.
Does anyone really give a f**k if the mark up has ended up in team Hatton rather than the tout's pocket ? I don't.
Posted: 01 Jan 2008, 05:56
by chris s
Absolutely spot on mate.
I saw the stick you got.
Posted: 01 Jan 2008, 07:47
by rhino222
chris s wrote:Don't see what the problem is. If you don't like prices don't buy.
Buy tickets for major concerts and by the time you pay booking fees, service charge, cc fees and post it is 20% more than the ticket.
errr...no its not !!
Posted: 01 Jan 2008, 08:19
by chris s
rhino222 wrote:chris s wrote:Don't see what the problem is. If you don't like prices don't buy.
Buy tickets for major concerts and by the time you pay booking fees, service charge, cc fees and post it is 20% more than the ticket.
errr...no its not !!
Buy a ticket for any major gig at the MEN or Newcastle Arena from Ticketmaster and you pay 20%-25% over that is printed on the ticket.
Bought a ticket for Foofighters from Ticketmaster the other day. Face value was about £40, but with charges etc paid £52.
Posted: 01 Jan 2008, 08:24
by BunglesFingers
chris s wrote:rhino222 wrote:chris s wrote:Don't see what the problem is. If you don't like prices don't buy.
Buy tickets for major concerts and by the time you pay booking fees, service charge, cc fees and post it is 20% more than the ticket.
errr...no its not !!
Buy a ticket for any major gig at the MEN or Newcastle Arena from Ticketmaster and you pay 20%-25% over that is printed on the ticket.
Bought a ticket for Foofighters from Ticketmaster the other day. Face value was about £40, but with charges etc paid £52.
Forget ticketmater, use Stargreen! They charge a little more than face value but once you add up fees & postage they work out cheaper. Most events will cost you at least 10-15% above face value, sometimes you are better off going to the venue and buying one on the street. No booking fee there.
Hatton is not a 'man of the people', he's a businessman otherwise he'd be out in the street giving away fight tickets and christmas turkey's. The sports and music event ticket industry is in a right mess.
Posted: 01 Jan 2008, 09:19
by rhino222
chris s wrote:rhino222 wrote:chris s wrote:Don't see what the problem is. If you don't like prices don't buy.
Buy tickets for major concerts and by the time you pay booking fees, service charge, cc fees and post it is 20% more than the ticket.
errr...no its not !!
Buy a ticket for any major gig at the MEN or Newcastle Arena from Ticketmaster and you pay 20%-25% over that is printed on the ticket.
Bought a ticket for Foofighters from Ticketmaster the other day. Face value was about £40, but with charges etc paid £52.
so now you change your parameters from your original post and dictate which ticket agency i have to use !!!!

you should shop around.
but incidentally, i have 2 tickets in front of me for dolly parton at the nottingham arena (they are my daughters not mine ...

) 2 tickets with face value of 65 quid each, total paid including booking fee and postage etc is 144.50
now that is not 20% .... not with anyones maths !!!!