Page 2 of 2

Posted: 15 Jan 2008, 12:41
by Max Molyneux
I thought I said Hops was mediocre not that he looked It against Tarver but Tarver was overrated and Is nothing more than a Celebrity boxer like Fraud.

Do you read my genuis properly?

Posted: 15 Jan 2008, 12:42
by Max Molyneux
Terry D wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:
Terry D wrote: Yeah, because Hopkis did not clear out middleweight at all did he? :roll:
He cleared out when he unified and exposed Tito.
Read your first post, then read my reply, then do the math!
Your post = Sarcasm.

Posted: 15 Jan 2008, 12:46
by hitman_hatton1
Max Molyneux wrote:I thought I said Hops was mediocre not that he looked It against Tarver but Tarver was overrated and Is nothing more than a Celebrity boxer like Fraud.

Do you read my genuis properly?
i agree tarver was nothing special.

he was still world class though.

hops just pissed all over him like a joke. :lol:

i still think hops-calzaghe is an up for grabs fight.

hops style could prove a headache.

Posted: 15 Jan 2008, 14:20
by Rob Magic
Dont forget Hopkins has been in with some truly great fighters while Calzaghe was just fighting mediocre mandatory's. I aint knocking joe and agree with most that FW should of had Calzaghe fighting the best out there but we all know Frank. Anyway i hope Calzaghe destroys Hopkins but i think it will go down to the wire and for some strange reason i have a feeling we might get a SD.