Page 2 of 2
Posted: 15 Jan 2008, 12:41
by Max Molyneux
I thought I said Hops was mediocre not that he looked It against Tarver but Tarver was overrated and Is nothing more than a Celebrity boxer like Fraud.
Do you read my genuis properly?
Posted: 15 Jan 2008, 12:42
by Max Molyneux
Terry D wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:Terry D wrote:
Yeah, because Hopkis did not clear out middleweight at all did he?

He cleared out when he unified and exposed Tito.
Read your first post, then read my reply, then do the math!
Your post = Sarcasm.
Posted: 15 Jan 2008, 12:46
by hitman_hatton1
Max Molyneux wrote:I thought I said Hops was mediocre not that he looked It against Tarver but Tarver was overrated and Is nothing more than a Celebrity boxer like Fraud.
Do you read my genuis properly?
i agree tarver was nothing special.
he was still world class though.
hops just pissed all over him like a joke.
i still think hops-calzaghe is an up for grabs fight.
hops style could prove a headache.
Posted: 15 Jan 2008, 14:20
by Rob Magic
Dont forget Hopkins has been in with some truly great fighters while Calzaghe was just fighting mediocre mandatory's. I aint knocking joe and agree with most that FW should of had Calzaghe fighting the best out there but we all know Frank. Anyway i hope Calzaghe destroys Hopkins but i think it will go down to the wire and for some strange reason i have a feeling we might get a SD.