Posted: 02 Feb 2008, 17:57
Yeah, old time fighters never fouled. Greb, Zivic, Dempsey, Sharkey, Marciano... foul? Ha, never.
One thing I have said in the past is that I don't believe that its fair to assume that Douglas, on the night he fought Mike in Tokyo, couldn't have beaten the Tyson who fought Spinks. I think for all we know he may well have, even if it had been a tougher fight. Or maybe Tyson would have won, but the point is we shouldn't just assume that he would have.
That said, Tyson was obviously in bad shape, and that made Douglas look real good. I don't think its safe to assume that Lewis never had a performance as good as the one Douglas had against Tyson. Lewis-Holyfield I and Lewis-Rahman II weren't all that bad, where they? And while Tyson wasn't a 240 pound Tua, Lewis wasn't a 38 year old Holmes or a 16-0 Tyrell Biggs. I think Lewis' reach and power and boxing ability might allow him to win a close one against Mike. If Mike won I doubt anyone would be surprised, but I would favor Lennox.
Show of hands, does anyone honestly believe that Holyfield's head butting was the only thing that allowed him to beat Tyson in those fights? Not his defense, counter punching, apparent strength advantage, or even his excessive holding?
One thing I have said in the past is that I don't believe that its fair to assume that Douglas, on the night he fought Mike in Tokyo, couldn't have beaten the Tyson who fought Spinks. I think for all we know he may well have, even if it had been a tougher fight. Or maybe Tyson would have won, but the point is we shouldn't just assume that he would have.
That said, Tyson was obviously in bad shape, and that made Douglas look real good. I don't think its safe to assume that Lewis never had a performance as good as the one Douglas had against Tyson. Lewis-Holyfield I and Lewis-Rahman II weren't all that bad, where they? And while Tyson wasn't a 240 pound Tua, Lewis wasn't a 38 year old Holmes or a 16-0 Tyrell Biggs. I think Lewis' reach and power and boxing ability might allow him to win a close one against Mike. If Mike won I doubt anyone would be surprised, but I would favor Lennox.
Show of hands, does anyone honestly believe that Holyfield's head butting was the only thing that allowed him to beat Tyson in those fights? Not his defense, counter punching, apparent strength advantage, or even his excessive holding?