Good analogy, Waylon. The tried and test formula of the comedian and his "straight man". It works for me. Bunce and Woodhall are fine in my book.WildWaylon wrote:Its a bit of Eric and Ernie isnt it. Buncey being Eric and Woodhall playing Ernie. Maybe a strange analogy but I think you should understand what I mean. Buncey entertains with his over the top manner but never the less good fight knowledge and Ritchie is more down to earth with his view of things. I think Setanta see Buncey as good value for money and lets be honest he does add something, I like him. Buncey is the poor mans Alexi Sayle LOL.
steve bunce
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Buncey and Richie are good pals - Woodhall would have taken Bunce's comments in his stride as would Bunce about the comments on here.Wax On wrote:Bunce is fast becoming the Sid Waddell of Boxing. The master of Over Statement and over excitedness!!
Agreed with his comments on the fight, but calling anyone who scored it wrongly a disgrace was a bit OTT. Especially with Richie Woodall stood next to him!
I firmly believe Setanta have got it right concerning their coverage - as mad as some will say I am - I like Rawling and Woodhall as a combination, and I like the Dempsey and Bunce combination with Abrams thrown in there as well.
If Setanta get rid of any of them I think it will be a great big f*cking mistake.
Woodhall is entitled to make the odd mistake - I just don't want him sucking up to W arren and his fighters just to keep his job - as long as he continues the way he is - I will be way happy!!!
-
SticknMove
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5993
- Joined: 04 Aug 2006, 09:02
Another thread dedicated to Buncey. That tells me all I need to know. Didn't watch the fight last night, but caught the rerun today and thankfully it didn't feature the 'colour guy'.
I dont dislike him at all but if he could reign it in a bit and cut down on the overbearing hyperbole then I'd be happy.
Unfortunately that's not in his MO, so fvck off you fat chancer.
I dont dislike him at all but if he could reign it in a bit and cut down on the overbearing hyperbole then I'd be happy.
Unfortunately that's not in his MO, so fvck off you fat chancer.
That MC is useless, where did Frank find him? His hands are always shaking.Wax On wrote:One man who does need firing though is the MC, how he got that job I've no idea. It sounds like he's reading from the card he has in his hand when he introduces the fights, which he invariably is!!
He needs a few lessons from Bunce in building drama
-
StepinFetchit
- Heavyweight

I like Rawling and Woodhall as a combination,quote]Spud wrote:Wax On wrote:Bunce is fast becoming the Sid Waddell of Boxing. The master of Over Statement and over excitedness!!
Agreed with his comments on the fight, but calling anyone who scored it wrongly a disgrace was a bit OTT. Especially with Richie Woodall stood next to him!
You would like Rawling, he's in the same line of c^ntism as yourself.
KEV! , BEV! BEV? KEV??......NICE CAR! WANNA TAKE ON TEN CRIPPLING GRAND'S WORTH OF DEBT FOR A FCKIN NEW MOTOR??Wax On wrote:One man who does need firing though is the MC, how he got that job I've no idea. It sounds like he's reading from the card he has in his hand when he introduces the fights, which he invariably is!!
He needs a few lessons from Bunce in building drama
How the fck can you not be impressed by that??
Seriously though, where was the advert for that one I could do better myself, loads better, cos I would be genuinely excited to be stood there. I need an agent thingy.
-
pasty_spud
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 338
- Joined: 20 Feb 2005, 04:22
Wax On wrote:Bunce is fast becoming the Sid Waddell of Boxing. The master of Over Statement and over excitedness!!
Agreed with his comments on the fight, but calling anyone who scored it wrongly a disgrace was a bit OTT. Especially with Richie Woodall stood next to him!
buncy came out with a beauty a few weeks ago,can't remember who was fighting but one of the fighters had a huge cut above his eye and buncy said " the gash was so big he could have passed twins through it"
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:KEV! , BEV! BEV? KEV??......NICE CAR! WANNA TAKE ON TEN CRIPPLING GRAND'S WORTH OF DEBT FOR A FCKIN NEW MOTOR??Wax On wrote:One man who does need firing though is the MC, how he got that job I've no idea. It sounds like he's reading from the card he has in his hand when he introduces the fights, which he invariably is!!
He needs a few lessons from Bunce in building drama
How the fck can you not be impressed by that??
Seriously though, where was the advert for that one I could do better myself, loads better, cos I would be genuinely excited to be stood there. I need an agent thingy.
I could do the agent thingy mate how much do you think I can earn off your talent
I am surprise he hasn't been sacked yet, he holds on to his card like he's holding on for dear life and reads everything off it.Wax On wrote:One man who does need firing though is the MC, how he got that job I've no idea. It sounds like he's reading from the card he has in his hand when he introduces the fights, which he invariably is!!
He needs a few lessons from Bunce in building drama
He always makes mistakes too, he introduced the fight as the WBA lightweight...light-welterweight championship. Michael Pass wasn't great but he sure could do a hell of a lot better than Mark Burdiss.
my girlfriend loved Michael Pass before he disappeared but it never bothered me cos I got to watch a lot of boxing without the earache about missing the second part of Ugly Betty or some such Yank crap, no offence.
A bit on the orange side but he got the job done.
The black guy on Sky makes me laugh - is it Gary Logan - I swear I root for him NOT to cock up whenever he takes to the mike...at Thaxton-Stewart he gave us after the fight ......." ...making his sex...sexful....successful defence!"
absolute classic. If you are gonna struggle with these words then either practice the night before or don't try to read them.
A bit on the orange side but he got the job done.
The black guy on Sky makes me laugh - is it Gary Logan - I swear I root for him NOT to cock up whenever he takes to the mike...at Thaxton-Stewart he gave us after the fight ......." ...making his sex...sexful....successful defence!"
absolute classic. If you are gonna struggle with these words then either practice the night before or don't try to read them.
-
Rocky Balboa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1851
- Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 16:38
Was Richie stood next to Buncey? Steve is lucky Richie didn't plant one on his whiskers!Wax On wrote:Bunce is fast becoming the Sid Waddell of Boxing. The master of Over Statement and over excitedness!!
Agreed with his comments on the fight, but calling anyone who scored it wrongly a disgrace was a bit OTT. Especially with Richie Woodall stood next to him!
I think Woodhall could take him. Buncey looks far too out of shape!
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
I must have been influenced by the cheap Aldi's Baron Jean vino because I had Rees close going into the last couple.
Perhaps I wanted Rees to win too much to view clearly.
I've grown to appreciate the energy Buncey injects, just how dull would it be for casual fans if it was just objective, rehearsed, cautious delivery all the time.
You need some Buncey to liven things up.
Perhaps I wanted Rees to win too much to view clearly.
I've grown to appreciate the energy Buncey injects, just how dull would it be for casual fans if it was just objective, rehearsed, cautious delivery all the time.
You need some Buncey to liven things up.
-
lurkyshaka
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 569
- Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 13:19
He doesn't always say it as it is though... thats the problem.Spud wrote:Bunce is passionate about boxing and says it how it is - what the f*ck is the problem with that.
If any of you taped the fight - re-view bunce being interviewed and then tell me what the f*ck he said which was so outrageous or so wrong.
He said that the reason Pavlik vs Duddy is off, is cause Duddy "stunk the place out" the other week. So if the crowd going bannas and standing up is stinking the place out... just what was Hagler vs Hearns.
Duddy vs Pavlik aint happening cause of the cut... thats the only reason.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45233
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Waddell is an absolute genius, I wouldn't put Buncey, much as I like him, in the same orbit let alone street.Wax On wrote:Bunce is fast becoming the Sid Waddell of Boxing. The master of Over Statement and over excitedness!!
Agreed with his comments on the fight, but calling anyone who scored it wrongly a disgrace was a bit OTT. Especially with Richie Woodall stood next to him!
Waddell is peerless when it comes to commentary. Stuart Hall was pretty good back in the day.
-
lurkyshaka
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 569
- Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 13:19
I wouldn't say he did....certainly no more than anyone else.nickd wrote:He certainly played the company man when Audley Harrison was stinking it out on the BBC.lurkyshaka wrote:I like Buncey....He's a bombastic but he's also honest, forthright and doesn't play the 'company man' that many of the pundits/writers do.
Harrison was a very talented but erratic fighter. He had the ability to make an impact at the highest level as his Olympic triumph shows, but he lacked the drive and consistency. I don't think Bunce blew smoke up anyone's arse regarding Harrison.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45233
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
He did say he believed Harrison would go on to be a world champion, and unfortunately said anything but in his newspaper column.
Bunce performs a certain job for TV, I don't know that he neccessarily beleives everything he says. On quiet reflection, when he is sitting down writing, he probably comes to different conclusions oftentimes.
Bunce performs a certain job for TV, I don't know that he neccessarily beleives everything he says. On quiet reflection, when he is sitting down writing, he probably comes to different conclusions oftentimes.
-
lurkyshaka
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 569
- Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 13:19