Calzaghe 1/2, Hopkins 5/2, who would you back?

jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Asterix wrote:
WildWaylon wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:yes my grand would be on calzaghe too. its a easy fight for Joe in my opinion, took this fight at the right time. 3 or 4 years ago i would go for Bernard. This is a clever move for the calzaghe camp a great name on your record and its looks brill on paper.
Not sure about it being a clever move, it has been a burning ambition of Joes to fight Hopkins for years now. Joe pleaded with Hopkins quite a few years ago to fight him but Hopkins told Joe to get in line behind all the others who wanted the chance. Finally Joe has a big enough name in America and Hopkins has finally agreed. For Joe its a dream come true but I think Joe would have preferred fighting him in his prime rather than at 43. Even so Hopkins is still good enough to give Joe problems. My money would have to go on Joe for a points win. No way will Joe get a KO victory, but one mistake, a bit of showboating and Hopkins might.
Kessler caught Joe with a very good uppercut and it had very little effect. I don't see Hopkins knocking out Calzaghe.
I find it laughable all this talk of HOpkins getting a KO, if anyone gets the stoppage it's Joe, not Bernard.

Who was the last top flight opponent who belonged at the weight that Bernard stopped, Trinidad! Trinidad was moving up in weight.

Let's not forget, Joe is a career 168 lb fighter, he wont have to build up to the weight, he will just have less weight to lose, whereas Hopkins had to recruit Mackie Shilstone to move up to 175.

If Bernard couldn't stop Eastman, he won't stop Calzaghe, Joe has an excellent chin, and is used to taking shots off of far bigger punchers than Hopkins. Kessler hits way harder, and was an accurate puncher too, and Calzaghe shook off this shots pretty easily.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by Spud »

The fight goes to points - whoever you are going for - surely you realise that - and will bet accordingly.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/inthering/vi ... arns-Yank/

Be funny If Joe did butt him but he would be one fined while Hopkins would get away with any bully tactics.
lurkyshaka
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 569
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 13:19

Post by lurkyshaka »

They could have Hopkins at 20/1 and i still wouldn't put a penny on him because he's going to lose.

My money will be going on Calzaghe.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by Spud »

lurkyshaka wrote:They could have Hopkins at 20/1 and i still wouldn't put a penny on him because he's going to lose.

My money will be going on Calzaghe.
Will you give me 20/1 then?

If so I will bet my £5 against your £100
Post Reply