BoxRec

Wright outlanded Hop but that doesnt mean he won the fite!!

rhino222 wrote:joe calzaghe is a very fortunate cookie to get that decision tonight, and in america too.

i thought hops was ultra cautious even by his own standards tonight.

least he upped it late in the taylor fights and winky fight as well.

but in this fight he scored the early knockdown and basically shut up shop.

he won rd 8 and 10 and that was about it conclusively after the 3rd rd.

Wright outlanded Hopkins by 15, Calzaghe outlanded him by 105. They're hardly comparable

stujones wrote:

DG. wrote:

stujones wrote:I know I am in a huge minority - but Joe is 0-1-1 in his last two fights for me.

Taylor and Calzaghe may have got the nod over BHOP, but neither BEAT him. Neither figured him out.

And 5 years ago - I think Hopkins might have stopped Joe.

Well, Hopkins should have fought him 5 years ago then!

Maybe, but are the full ins and out declared on what went on there - have both parties publically aired their opinion?

Yes, Hopking accepted terms, then the next day asked for double!

From £3M to $6M!


ALSO - remember that B-Hop was always starting negotiations then backing out, remember he was due t fight Jones AND JAMES TONEY at cruiser!


Hopkins should retire now, he is shit to watch!

stujones wrote:

DG. wrote:

stujones wrote:I know I am in a huge minority - but Joe is 0-1-1 in his last two fights for me.

Taylor and Calzaghe may have got the nod over BHOP, but neither BEAT him. Neither figured him out.

And 5 years ago - I think Hopkins might have stopped Joe.

Well, Hopkins should have fought him 5 years ago then!

Maybe, but are the full ins and out declared on what went on there - have both parties publically aired their opinion?

you're either self hating or just had a big bet on hopkins. cal wasn't boxing well but apart from the knockdown won closely but clearly

It was a close fight that could have gone either way. To call it a disgrace of a decision is ridiculous. Calzaghe is a worthy winner.

Quality, clean work boys, not just running fprward with cuffing shots!!!

I love the skill factor in the Sport and tonight the technician lost and its very sad

DG. wrote:

stujones wrote:

DG. wrote:
Well, Hopkins should have fought him 5 years ago then!

Maybe, but are the full ins and out declared on what went on there - have both parties publically aired their opinion?

Yes, Hopking accepted terms, then the next day asked for double!

From £3M to $6M!


ALSO - remember that B-Hop was always starting negotiations then backing out, remember he was due t fight Jones AND JAMES TONEY at cruiser!


Hopkins should retire now, he is shit to watch!

Yes, I know thats what the story is.... all I saying is, did both parties accept that this happend.

thepocketrocket wrote:Quality, clean work boys, not just running fprward with cuffing shots!!!

Coming from a McCullough nuthugger that is hilarious. :E

No, DG has his blinkers on!!!! hope he gets his nocturnal Boxing gloves on next!!!

Twinkle Toes wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:Quality, clean work boys, not just running fprward with cuffing shots!!!

Coming from a McCullough nuthugger that is hilarious. :E

OK, I wont bite, im sure Wayne has more to his arsenal, as im sure Joe has, just not tonight...it just seemed very similar to Woodhall hoping Rees got a robbery cos he is British, to me robberies ruin the Sport, they transcend nationality!!

E wrote:

stujones wrote:

DG. wrote:
Well, Hopkins should have fought him 5 years ago then!

Maybe, but are the full ins and out declared on what went on there - have both parties publically aired their opinion?

you're either self hating or just had a big bet on hopkins. cal wasn't boxing well but apart from the knockdown won closely but clearly

No I am in the money I thought Calzaghe was going to win easy - and was worried he would embarres Hopkins - but, I don't like seeing the champion lose a decision like that... whether its by a Welshman or not.

So why is me ASKING a question if both parties have declared the same story regarding the millenium stadium negotations a sign of "self-hating".

According to Steve Collins - Roy Jones turned down a reasonable offer to fight him... according to team Jones, the offer was financially unviable.

Hopkins was asked the question this week Stu, and he didn't deny it - Nuff said really.

thepocketrocket wrote:

E wrote:

stujones wrote:I know I am in a huge minority - but Joe is 0-1-1 in his last two fights for me.

Taylor and Calzaghe may have got the nod over BHOP, but neither BEAT him. Neither figured him out.

And 5 years ago - I think Hopkins might have stopped Joe.

you are severely in th eminority and you clearly know little about boxing.

Stu knows loads about Boxing, whether I agree with him on occasions is irrelevant but he is clued up

how does it taste mate? What are you a couple? Who is the shirtlifter and who is the pillow biter? That Stu ain't got a Scooby doo

stujones wrote:

DG. wrote:

stujones wrote: Maybe, but are the full ins and out declared on what went on there - have both parties publically aired their opinion?

Yes, Hopking accepted terms, then the next day asked for double!

From £3M to $6M!


ALSO - remember that B-Hop was always starting negotiations then backing out, remember he was due t fight Jones AND JAMES TONEY at cruiser!


Hopkins should retire now, he is shit to watch!

Yes, I know thats what the story is.... all I saying is, did both parties accept that this happend.

Hopkins did NOT deny it! - thats good enough for me!

Twinkle Toes wrote:Hopkins was asked the question this week Stu, and he didn't deny it - Nuff said really.

Well fair enough then, appologies on that. I didn't know that.

E wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:

E wrote: you are severely in th eminority and you clearly know little about boxing.

Stu knows loads about Boxing, whether I agree with him on occasions is irrelevant but he is clued up

how does it taste mate? What are you a couple? Who is the shirtlifter and who is the pillow biter? That Stu ain't got a Scooby doo

You wont get a nasty response mate, that level of stupidity lives on the current scene, not on these shores where even if we disagree(as we often do) we dont resort to calling each other gays!!!

thepocketrocket wrote:No, DG has his blinkers on!!!! hope he gets his nocturnal Boxing gloves on next!!!

The RECORD BOOKS will show it.


I just watched it agian, JC by 3 rounds!!!

thepocketrocket wrote:

E wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote: Stu knows loads about Boxing, whether I agree with him on occasions is irrelevant but he is clued up

how does it taste mate? What are you a couple? Who is the shirtlifter and who is the pillow biter? That Stu ain't got a Scooby doo

You wont get a nasty response mate, that level of stupidity lives on the current scene, not on these shores where even if we disagree(as we often do) we dont resort to calling each other gays!!!

Shut up you pair of poofs!

whoops!

Sorry!

DG. wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:No, DG has his blinkers on!!!! hope he gets his nocturnal Boxing gloves on next!!!

The RECORD BOOKS will show it.


I just watched it agian, JC by 3 rounds!!!

But without the blinkers on Dennis!!! glad im not the only one awake still!!

thepocketrocket wrote:

DG. wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:No, DG has his blinkers on!!!! hope he gets his nocturnal Boxing gloves on next!!!

The RECORD BOOKS will show it.


I just watched it agian, JC by 3 rounds!!!

But without the blinkers on Dennis!!! glad im not the only one awake still!!

Hopkins did f all!

The mugger was horrible and the technician tried to make it into a spoiling match which he succeeded in.

It was a vile, atrocious fight. Calzaghe looked so much like Hatton going into the big fight without many ideas.

Hopkins should retire. He contributes almost nothing to a fight, does just enough to nutralise the other guy without actually, ACTIVELY doing anything.


The fact is Calzaghe won. OK, I'll go with this. Calzaghe beat a 43 yo man by split decision. Very disappointing. I know Hopkins wasn't a willing partner but still, I thought Joe was meant to be adaptable. He still has dues to pay a light heavy. Why not go for Glen Johnson? An old bastard that fvcking fights a full night's work every fight, who throws clean shots, and who may have beaten a 25 yo big talent in Chad Dawson last weekend?

It's clear why Warren has saved all this for so long. Joe doesn't have a proper fighting style. It works vs guys who come at him, but not necessarily s guys he has to go after.

Well if im struggling to sleep you crap is helping me, sing it now!

'Did rush and mauling win the Taff the fight, I say no, no no'

i was dissapointed with the quality of action but i had calz winning a close fought fight,hopkins did everything to put joe into frustration and at times he did-making it an ugly fight but joes higher but lower than usual workrate probably did it for me.

theres always someone that makes good fighters look bad.

hopkins has had his days and now its time to get out the ring and now its .time to concentrate on other things but i also think joe should have 1 final fight at roy jones and then sign out.hes had a good life in the ring so now time to enjoy the rest of it with his family

Erdei? Yes. Johnson? Yes. Jones Jr? Please no.

Why do we want to watch Joe cash in vs another guy who will try and survive?

Ages ago I wrote that post Lacy, Joe should not go for Jones and Hopkins as they were bouts to make him look bad.

Warren cannot resist picking the massive advantage. Backfired with Enzo vs a "drained" Haye and it nearly backfired tonight when Joe was spoiled all night long.

Is this how we like our boxers to be moved along, is this how we want 'em to be developed? Warning signs for future stars with wonky styles. Go out to the US early, learn the tricky inside stuff that opponents do, take in the atmosphere and learn to deal with it ASAP. No point building up and building up, threatening to do it for years and then going out there and flopping. Yeah, I mean Khan. Get him a proper learnign curve in other words.