Page 2 of 3

Posted: 09 May 2008, 17:48
by stujones
whicker wrote:Just curious- how closely does your scoring match that given by the sky team?
I would imagine its pretty much Identical.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 17:48
by Autobarn
after 9, 5-4 Truscott

Posted: 09 May 2008, 17:48
by stujones
Round 9 -

Truscott round..... quite close, but Akaba didn't do much.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 17:51
by stujones
Round 10.

Akaba - bit more accurate with the right hand lead (like a cross).

Akaba round.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 17:52
by Autobarn
Akaba wins 10th. 5-5. Time for Truscott to close strong. He can do it.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 17:53
by stujones
I have it 5-4-1 Truscott but its close.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 17:56
by stujones
These rounds are close.

Thought Akaba started well in the 11th and did pretty well apart from the last 15 seconds.

Round Akaba.

5-5-1.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 17:57
by TerribleTerry
Surely the home advantage will bring Truscott home with a narrow points win?

He has impressed me tonight. More physically mature then I thought he was to be honest.

He is a cracking fighter all right - not just cute moves but heart and toughness to go with it.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:00
by Autobarn
Truscott takes a big 12th. Wouldn't argue with T by 1 point but I smell a draw.

A was throwing all the accurate shots early in the 11th but did nothing else rest of the rd and T closed that rd strong. Tempted to make the 11th level, meaning T by 1.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:00
by stujones
Round 12.

Akaba started well, but Truscott took over in the last 2 minutes.

Round Truscott.

6-5-1 to Truscott.... could go either way though.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:02
by stujones
Truscott wins - by Unaminous decision.

Well done, deserved.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:03
by TerribleTerry
thats why you pay the extra cash for home town advantage.

Could have gone either way but I am chuffed for Truscott - he boxed really well and showed heart and determination

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:03
by whicker
What were the scores?

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:05
by hitman_hatton1
close fight.

had it the same as jim.

level pegging.

truscott proved himself a decent fighter tonight.

good smarts.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:05
by Croydon1
115-113
116-112 x2 ... i think

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:07
by whicker
Surely a crack at the British Title is the next logical step for Truscott- what do you think?

Or even a (somewhat unlikely) bout against Derry Mathews?

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:08
by Autobarn
fornicating yes! Truscott UD. Bit wide on 2 cards but he thoroughly deserved that title.

Brilliant showing from a young prospect- always rated Truscott & fantastic to see him do well.

Great win. 2 year pro, 11 fights, does 12 rds and beats a classy African. How good can Paul be?

Sure, he got the guy at the right time. In the right place. But this is how it should be done over here. A hard opponent who makes you concentrate all the way.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:10
by TheGoods
Made up for him. Pal of mine. Would have been there tonight but am babysitting. Glad like as I cleaned up on the betting. Trussy 5/2 at one stage and 10/11 at the death. He's a class act but with limited power. Game as a pebble and I hope he pushes on from this as he's a sound lad as well.
EY EI OH, EY EI OH, EY EI OH, EY EI OH...
EY EI OH, EY EI OH, EY EI OH, EY EI OH...

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:15
by ogii3
Autobarn wrote:effing yes! Truscott UD. Bit wide on 2 cards but he thoroughly deserved that title.

Brilliant showing from a young prospect- always rated Truscott & fantastic to see him do well.

Great win. 2 year pro, 11 fights, does 12 rds and beats a classy African. How good can Paul be?

Sure, he got the guy at the right time. In the right place. But this is how it should be done over here. A hard opponent who makes you concentrate all the way.
Not agree with you. The African wasn't so classy. He didn't breath on Paul's neck entire fight, he presses for 30 seconds, then stand on the center of the ring waiting. With his height disadvantage and more power in his hands he must be pressing entire match. Paul's shots didn't hurt African. I don;t think Paul Truscott will have any chance against a fighter, who may presure. I like only Truscott's right streight, his body shots were awful. He must improve a lot, but if we take in summit, that it's first 12-th rounder, fighting first fighter with some nice record behind his back, it's B performance for Boro's

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:17
by stujones
Battle of the prospects Pauls' down the line... Truscott vs Appleby?

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:28
by TerribleTerry
stujones wrote:Battle of the prospects Pauls' down the line... Truscott vs Appleby?
Could be a great fight!

Has Gilmour got them both? I think he has..

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:39
by Autobarn
If he has, I think he'd want to keep 'em apart. I know I would.

I'd guide Truscott to the WBU and Appewby to the IBO.

Only kidding.

Posted: 09 May 2008, 18:39
by stujones
TerribleTerry wrote:
stujones wrote:Battle of the prospects Pauls' down the line... Truscott vs Appleby?
Could be a great fight!

Has Gilmour got them both? I think he has..
Yeah - I'd look forward to that more than Fewkes vs Murray or Smith vs Barker.

I'd favour Appleby I think - depends if he gets past Simpson or not.

Posted: 10 May 2008, 05:01
by Autobarn
ogii3 wrote:
Autobarn wrote:effing yes! Truscott UD. Bit wide on 2 cards but he thoroughly deserved that title.

Brilliant showing from a young prospect- always rated Truscott & fantastic to see him do well.

Great win. 2 year pro, 11 fights, does 12 rds and beats a classy African. How good can Paul be?

Sure, he got the guy at the right time. In the right place. But this is how it should be done over here. A hard opponent who makes you concentrate all the way.
Not agree with you. The African wasn't so classy. He didn't breath on Paul's neck entire fight, he presses for 30 seconds, then stand on the center of the ring waiting. With his height disadvantage and more power in his hands he must be pressing entire match. Paul's shots didn't hurt African. I don;t think Paul Truscott will have any chance against a fighter, who may presure. I like only Truscott's right streight, his body shots were awful. He must improve a lot, but if we take in summit, that it's first 12-th rounder, fighting first fighter with some nice record behind his back, it's B performance for Boro's
I thought it was an excellent performance.

The body shots might be why Akaba didn't press consistently.

It's hard to fight a southpaw, especially a good one. Truscott delivered the goods. What impressed me was that when he had bad rounds he went out and had a better round the next time. Truscott looked good last night - winning a competitive bout - but he is much better than he looked last night. Perhaps because of his lack of power, Truscott has to box well all the time and maintain a high level of concentration.

Against an orthodox fighter who pressures he will be a lot better. Massive result, the Commonwealth title can bring Truscott some great learning fights and hopefuly he'll advance to Euro and world title fights.

Can Truscott be the Brit to beat Jackson Asiku I wonder?

Posted: 10 May 2008, 05:05
by Autobarn
stujones wrote:
TerribleTerry wrote:
stujones wrote:Battle of the prospects Pauls' down the line... Truscott vs Appleby?
Could be a great fight!

Has Gilmour got them both? I think he has..
Yeah - I'd look forward to that more than Fewkes vs Murray or Smith vs Barker.

I'd favour Appleby I think - depends if he gets past Simpson or not.
Seems like they will go their seperate ways. I mean Truscott's just had his big test and won his first proper title. Appleby's got his test v Simpson for the British. These lads are being moved well and I think it could be bad news to match them vs each other when they both have potential to one day crack the featherweight top 10.