Page 2 of 2
Posted: 12 May 2008, 12:22
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Tykemania wrote:sharpei_louis wrote:Think it's a bit early to jump on the Bradley bandwagon, don't think he looked overly special - pretty straightforward.
I had Witter 1, maybe 2, Bradley 3,4,5,6 (10-8), then although he was running a bit Witter did better in the 7th, so even, then Witter 8,9, Bradley 10,11,12.
116-112 Bradley. Amazed anyone could have scored it for Witter.
Agree with that last sentiment - it wouldn't take a genius to derive from my screen name the fact that I share a geographic allegiance with Junior, and I was struggling to give him the fight! I gave him the first three (though I have to confess I was only half watching the third), the 7,8,9 stretch and possibly a share of the eleventh. Even then he'd have only gotten a draw...
Yes but if Bradley got a point docked for use of the head, witter wins on your card
Posted: 12 May 2008, 18:27
by chesh
116-111 for Bradley was my card.
Posted: 13 May 2008, 06:49
by Tykemania
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Tykemania wrote:sharpei_louis wrote:Think it's a bit early to jump on the Bradley bandwagon, don't think he looked overly special - pretty straightforward.
I had Witter 1, maybe 2, Bradley 3,4,5,6 (10-8), then although he was running a bit Witter did better in the 7th, so even, then Witter 8,9, Bradley 10,11,12.
116-112 Bradley. Amazed anyone could have scored it for Witter.
Agree with that last sentiment - it wouldn't take a genius to derive from my screen name the fact that I share a geographic allegiance with Junior, and I was struggling to give him the fight! I gave him the first three (though I have to confess I was only half watching the third), the 7,8,9 stretch and possibly a share of the eleventh. Even then he'd have only gotten a draw...
Yes but if Bradley got a point docked for use of the head, witter wins on your card
Good point. Still doesn't get him to 116 does it?