Page 2 of 3
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 17:45
by josh fg
nuff respect for Lazcano getting into the 10th! Is it him doing well or ricky badly?
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 17:45
by Max Molyneux
Cortez should ref Hatton's fights from now on, the holding Is taking the piss.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 17:46
by Cannibal
Straight right is landing a few times for Lazcano. Straight rights and left hooks.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 17:47
by Grilling Machine
Yeah, Hatton's trying to hurt and hold now.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 17:51
by BAMBI
i can imagine FW's view on hatton's performance!!
lol..and Khan will do well against the current top heads..Hmmm!!
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 17:53
by Horse
Max Molyneux wrote:Cortez should ref Hatton's fights from now on, the holding Is taking the piss.
The holding is not that bad.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 17:53
by BAMBI

@ "industrial language"
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 17:58
by Max Molyneux
Horse wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:Cortez should ref Hatton's fights from now on, the holding Is taking the piss.
The holding is not that bad.
It Is, he pressures throws then holds. Instead of defending or countering when Juan throws back he holds him.
Juan should of had a KD scored too In the third with the straight right.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 18:01
by Horse
Max Molyneux wrote:Horse wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:Cortez should ref Hatton's fights from now on, the holding Is taking the piss.
The holding is not that bad.
It Is, he pressures throws then holds. Instead of defending or countering when Juan throws back he holds him.
Juan should of had a KD scored too In the third with the straight right.
It was a slip you daft sod. Stop being a prick. You don't like Hatton, we get it.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 18:02
by hitman_hatton1
the 3rd rd was never a knockdown.
couldn't really argue with that from hatton.
would he beat floyd? no.
would he beat cotto? no.
but is he still a class act? yes.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 18:04
by Max Molyneux
Horse wrote:
It was a slip you daft sod. Stop being a prick. You don't like Hatton, we get it.
My thoughts are not posted out of being Anti Hatton you retard.
A straight right landed hence It being a knockdown.
Were not all duped on Hatton like you.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 18:04
by Bard of Boxrec
wtf is up with Adam Smith slurring and sounding wasted?
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 18:05
by TerribleTerry
What were the results of the Facy and Moore fights? Anyone know?
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 18:07
by steve689
One sided beating really. Fair play to Lazcano, very tough and landed a few good counters. Pretty much what we expected though. Ricky held on to his coveted IBO world title though so that was the main thing
Some cheesy lines for the fans as the end...everyones happy!
P.S. Think Facey drew, not sure about Moore.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 18:17
by hitman_hatton1
Riddick Blowe wrote:wtf is up with Adam Smith slurring and sounding wasted?
must have been that 8th rd that done it.
bit hairy for a few seconds weren't it.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 18:36
by banjo
What were the official scores?
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 18:58
by Goz
There was a 120-108 there, a 120-110 and I think a 118-110.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 19:13
by Horse
Max Molyneux wrote:My thoughts are not posted out of being Anti Hatton you retard.
Would you be saying the same sort of things about Calzaghe if he slipped or held?
Max Molyneux wrote:A straight right landed hence It being a knockdown.
It would have been very harsh for the referee to count that as a knockdown. If you liked Ricky Hatton I doubt you would mention it.
Max Molyneux wrote:Were not all duped on Hatton like you.
What is this supposed to mean? You really are being ridiculous.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 24 May 2008, 19:18
by The_Don1
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 25 May 2008, 05:52
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
For Max and Horse, I didnt see the fight, but the official ruling for a KD should be a punch that results in a KD, if its a push it isnt a KD, but if its a punch and the fighter is immediately knocked down, then its a KD regardless of whether he was off balance and slipped or not. Thats the official ruling
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 25 May 2008, 05:55
by m1kee50
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:For Max and Horse, I didnt see the fight, but the official ruling for a KD should be a punch that results in a KD, if its a push it isnt a KD, but if its a punch and the fighter is immediately knocked down, then its a KD regardless of whether he was off balance and slipped or not. Thats the official ruling
Hatton threw and slipped. Lazcano didnt tag him. Dont know what Max is on about really.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 25 May 2008, 05:58
by DG.
hitman_hatton1 wrote:the 3rd rd was never a knockdown.
couldn't really argue with that from hatton.
would he beat floyd? no.
would he beat cotto? no.
but is he still a class act? yes.
How is he a class act?
No Jab, just run in straight lines and clinch hold when up close. Accept it, the boys done.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 25 May 2008, 06:55
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
MatthewS wrote:Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:For Max and Horse, I didnt see the fight, but the official ruling for a KD should be a punch that results in a KD, if its a push it isnt a KD, but if its a punch and the fighter is immediately knocked down, then its a KD regardless of whether he was off balance and slipped or not. Thats the official ruling
Hatton threw and slipped. Lazcano didnt tag him. Dont know what Max is on about really.
Just watched it on stream, I think it was just a slip, he wasnt hurt, I had Hatton winning every round, except maybe the 10th
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 25 May 2008, 07:10
by Max Molyneux
The straight right looked like It landed but I was watching Versus on a crappy webstream.
Re: Anyone do a R4R for us cheapskates
Posted: 25 May 2008, 07:11
by Max Molyneux
DG. wrote:hitman_hatton1 wrote:the 3rd rd was never a knockdown.
couldn't really argue with that from hatton.
would he beat floyd? no.
would he beat cotto? no.
but is he still a class act? yes.
How is he a class act?
No Jab, just run in straight lines and clinch hold when up close. Accept it, the boys done.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
He's fought that way since Tszyu and If he Isn't allowed to fight within the rules or fights someone who can bully him back, he looks bad or loses.
He's a class act outside the ring but Inside he's terrible.