Page 2 of 2
Re: Any career wrecked by inability to get fights?
Posted: 28 May 2008, 00:51
by granberry
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
Don't despair, Elmer. The forum no longer wants him gone --- we simply have him on Ignore.
What makes collin's stooge irene think he speaks for the "forum" ?
LOL
Re: Any career wrecked by inability to get fights?
Posted: 28 May 2008, 09:27
by observer1
Can someone tell me what Granberry said?
JK Granberry,

Re: Any career wrecked by inability to get fights?
Posted: 29 May 2008, 01:24
by HomicideHenry
Walcott wasn't avoided, he just lost too often. He had no legitimate complaint for not getting a title shot until he did.
I guess that can be argued, but rack up the names, the figures. Hell, alot of Walcott's fights were done on short notice, so hell why wouldn't he have lost from time to time?
Re: Any career wrecked by inability to get fights?
Posted: 09 Jun 2008, 10:16
by Nile4000
VoiceOnTV wrote:Yeah, Archie had to wait an unusually long time, and Charles got famous at Heavyweight although his best years were clearly at light heavy. Somebody mentioned McCallum. McCallum could get fights, just not the ones he really wanted (Hearns, Leonard,etc). I"m curious about the Mitch Green post cause it did seem like Mitch had periods of great innactivity.
Mitch Green himself said that Don King blackballed him.Not that his extracirricular activites helped him any.

Re: Any career wrecked by inability to get fights?
Posted: 12 Jun 2008, 21:46
by Collins2000
observer1 wrote:Can someone tell me what Granberry said?
JK Granberry,

He said he was really glad that someone has posted those links to his antics at CBZ.
I got funny little Elmar on ignore. It's great.