Page 2 of 3
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 07:05
by Autobarn
Sounds like Lacy was rubbish. I always knew it would go wrong for him. When everyone was in love with him in 2005, I kept saying that this guy would be a sitting duck after his peak.
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 07:09
by Flav1
Oh shitting hell.
I KNEW it would be a Lacy decision - I'M AN IDIOT.
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 08:30
by EddieShredder
EddieShredder wrote:I've chucked 1/2 my money on a Lacy KO, and 1/2 on a Cruz decision
The only way to win enough to climb back up the rankings is to bet on outcomes, not just decisions :(
Well... f@cked that up didn't I
Should you need to contact me, I can now be found at the bottom of the Boxpicks pile

Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 09:08
by Coco
EddieShredder wrote:EddieShredder wrote:I've chucked 1/2 my money on a Lacy KO, and 1/2 on a Cruz decision
The only way to win enough to climb back up the rankings is to bet on outcomes, not just decisions :(
Well... f@cked that up didn't I
Should you need to contact me, I can now be found at the bottom of the Boxpicks pile

What happened in the Cruz fight?
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 09:10
by EddieShredder
Coco wrote:EddieShredder wrote:EddieShredder wrote:I've chucked 1/2 my money on a Lacy KO, and 1/2 on a Cruz decision
The only way to win enough to climb back up the rankings is to bet on outcomes, not just decisions :(
Well... f@cked that up didn't I
Should you need to contact me, I can now be found at the bottom of the Boxpicks pile

What happened in the Cruz fight?
Won by KO

Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 09:11
by Coco
I bet my stack on Lacy and Cruz just to win cause i've been losing my money betting on decisions/KO's
I'm glad I did now!
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 09:12
by Max Molyneux
I bet on Cruz by KO too on the boxpicks, hope I get the coins because the opponent was changed.
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 09:19
by Flav1
Since I started boxpicks I've never been so interested in boxing, watching bouts I wouldn't normally dream of. Glorious thing.
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 09:24
by Captain Hook
He was poor fro what I've read, Taylor will have his way with him, and I'd fancy Froch to KO him if they ever fought.
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 09:26
by EddieShredder
Captain Hook wrote:He was poor fro what I've read, Taylor will have his way with him, and I'd fancy Froch to KO him if they ever fought.
Sounds like he made a very hard nights work of it, from what I've seen.... Maybe DiBella/HBO/Taylor might be a bit more interested in the Froch fight now?
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 09:43
by DavidPayne
DiBella will be more interested than ever. The fight was away from the mainstream cameras on a Wednesday night.
The record says three wins since losing to JC.
Lacy v Taylor will go ahead cannot see how it wouldn't unless Hennessey offered Taylor millions to come here.
Taylor is, and always has been, a big HBO fighter and the face of Everlast too.
He aint going to be risked in a provincial fight in the UK for contender fees.
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 09:44
by EddieShredder
Max Molyneux wrote:I bet on Cruz by KO too on the boxpicks, hope I get the coins because the opponent was changed.
Don't think you will..... they'll probably just refund your stake
Which is good for me.... seeings as I went for a decision

Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 10:24
by Asterix
EddieShredder wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:I bet on Cruz by KO too on the boxpicks, hope I get the coins because the opponent was changed.
Don't think you will..... they'll probably just refund your stake
Which is good for me.... seeings as I went for a decision

Yeah, your bet won't count if the opponent is changed.
I saw the Lacy v Mendoza fight last night. Lacy was in huge trouble in the 2nd round. If he fights Jermain Taylor, expect to see Taylor KO him.
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 11:12
by Britannian Stallion
Do you think Lacy will even want the fight with Taylor after how poorly he has performed in his fights since Calzaghe?
He was on unsteady legs last night and must know that he will be up against it Vs Taylor. Would he really want to go through another beating ala Calzaghe?
Of course, there's the money side of things. I'm sure Lacy will be well paid for a Taylor fight but will he be confident enough to take on the task? How will his camp feel about putting him in with Taylor, based on Lacy's recent performances?
While Taylor and co. were hoping Lacy would just win, I'm sure Lacy and his team were looking for a strong, dominant, confident performance.
Then again, if Lacy is now shot, and is aware of that, he may want to cash-in before, soon, hanging up the gloves.
Just a thought...
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 24 Jul 2008, 13:54
by steve689
I think i read somewhere that Jean Pascal was being matched with Karol Balszay for Calzaghe's vacated WBO belt?
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 04:09
by whiskey
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 07:27
by DavidPayne
steve689 wrote:I think i read somewhere that Jean Pascal was being matched with Karol Balszay for Calzaghe's vacated WBO belt?
Pascal pulled out before the purse bids mate.
Hope grows for Froch v Pascal
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 07:43
by Autobarn
Hope this happens, Froch v Pascal.
That could lead to Froch v Taylor and - if successful - Froch v Inkin.
Inkin would have a 3rd chance to pull out.
If Hennessy has Froch (as opposed to a Witter) as a world champion, welcome to the big time (IMO). If Carl can perform at this level, he has the power & the personality to be big.
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 07:51
by DavidPayne
Just a shame he'll be 31 and not 27.
But yep, he has the swagger to be a big star.
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 08:27
by Khaosai-Galaxy
I think the delight / relief on the faces of his corner when he beat a washed up Robin Reid tells you his corner suspected long ago that Lacy wasn't "all that and a bag of potato chips"
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 08:29
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Shouldnt Carl Frotch so something to get the big fights at 168?
Just looking at his career so far....and ummm...well....... whats the big fuss?
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 08:34
by DavidPayne
He's never had the in between fight has he?
Barney, Reid, Dodson, Magee, Porras etc are all at a certain level, he's never had the top ten fight he's needed and as such his 'apprenticeship' looks incomplete but we also know those opponents have never looked eager to tackle him.
But the worthy, but narrow pre-occupation with the WBC does narrow the field too.
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 08:56
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Quite, until he fights someone that isnt either a washed up British fighter or a European that most people on here haven't even heard of, im just not sure how on earth the names Taylor, Lacy and Frotch can all be mentioned in the same sentence
You dont see a lot of Taylor - Bika talk
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 09:01
by jamesmcdonnell
DavidPayne wrote:steve689 wrote:I think i read somewhere that Jean Pascal was being matched with Karol Balszay for Calzaghe's vacated WBO belt?
Pascal pulled out before the purse bids mate.
Hope grows for Froch v Pascal
I saw that one coming.
Re: Jeff Lacy
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 09:10
by DavidPayne
So we then have Lacy v Taylor for the WBO, you know that dodgy Euro belt the Yanks love to dismiss, and Froch and Pascal will bid for the WBC, you know the real belt not one of these phoneys only the Brits use.