Page 2 of 3
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 24 Sep 2008, 15:08
by Asterix
caffrey wrote:better than nothing i guess
why does everyone hate these walsh brothers?
- Racism from their fans towards opposing fighters.
- One of the Walsh brothers was very disrespectful when fighting (punching the other guy when he put his glove out to touch gloves after an incident). Michael Walsh, I think it was.
There are probably more reasons than that, but those are two I've encountered.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 24 Sep 2008, 16:30
by chinny
I wish Sky would show most of the bills live like Setanta do. Its not the same watching it after the live main event when they've already showed half the highlights and sometimes bloody knockdowns!
How many channels do sky sports have - 4? Not enough broadcast time to show the full bill live is it? Pisses me off

Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 24 Sep 2008, 19:12
by Gray-Fox
Asterix wrote:caffrey wrote:better than nothing i guess
why does everyone hate these walsh brothers?
- Racism from their fans towards opposing fighters.
- One of the Walsh brothers was very disrespectful when fighting (punching the other guy when he put his glove out to touch gloves after an incident). Michael Walsh, I think it was.
There are probably more reasons than that, but those are two I've encountered.
The first one is enough to be honest, but by that token Hatton should also not be liked, as his fans are equally as racist.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 25 Sep 2008, 08:47
by Chris W 1982
Crolla gets rematch against Hamini as well.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 25 Sep 2008, 18:55
by whicker
Horse wrote:Are sky happy with this junk?
He has only just come back to them and he is already putting on shows without any real fights on them.
Its an awful looking bill. Meaningless rematches, nothing of any note or real competative value. OK, the Crolla fight might be OK, but Walsh Deakin again? What exactly is the point of that?
The Main Event simply seems to be a question of finding an opponent who will give a good show, and lose.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 06:34
by leforge
Swaby v Chisora will be good.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 10:56
by Old bones Ian
Terry D wrote:Only heard about this today. I hope it is on TV

here's SKY schedule . tonights bill is listed.
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12947,00.html
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 11:10
by hitman_hatton1
i missed walsh the last time.
just heard about the antics.
they sound worse than DG and banjo in the run up to a junior witter fight.

Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 11:12
by Asterix
I see that only one of the Walshs is fighting.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 15:59
by DG.
hitman_hatton1 wrote:i missed walsh the last time.
just heard about the antics.
they sound worse than DG and banjo in the run up to a junior witter fight.

Shut it, you GIMP!
HitmanHatton1 prepares to get bottomed by Mark Thompson
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 16:18
by Andrey
Is there any possibility to watch Ricky Burns fight on Internet? Does anyone have a link?

Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 16:46
by WildWaylon
What a load of shit!!! bloody journeymen etc. How does he get away with such a card?
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 16:53
by banjo
hitman_hatton1 wrote:i missed walsh the last time.
just heard about the antics.
they sound worse than DG and banjo in the run up to a junior witter fight.

lol what makes you think I'm a Witter fan?
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 16:57
by steve689
Is this what the SKY subscription pays for these days?
I'd rather stick with Setanta and ITV I think.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 17:32
by whicker
From the results coming in, it appears to be a predicatable series of points wins so far.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 18:47
by steve689
Mark Birdis has really improved. Now he has learned to shout random words for added effect.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 19:01
by Horse
steve689 wrote:Mark Birdis has really improved. Now he has learned to shout random words for added effect.

Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 19:02
by Asterix
Ricky Burns looked poor. Nicky Cook would have an easy defence against him.
Chisora also looked poor for the first 2 rounds, but I believe him when he says that he had a cold. He has good power, but I'm not sure about his boxing ability. His defence was terrible.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 19:14
by whiteboy
steve689 wrote:Mark Birdis has really improved. Now he has learned to shout random words for added effect.
he really is poor, even the way he said 'friday fight night' annoyed me
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 19:43
by Gray-Fox
Any news on Anthony Crolla's fight?
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 19:48
by Horse
Gray-Fox wrote:Any news on Anthony Crolla's fight?
Crolla won on points.
http://www.boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=559979
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 19:58
by robster
whiteboy wrote:steve689 wrote:Mark Birdis has really improved. Now he has learned to shout random words for added effect.
he really is poor, even the way he said 'friday fight night' annoyed me
Craig Stephen, on Setanta's Hayemaker show, was miles better and it was his first time on TV.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 26 Sep 2008, 20:29
by whicker
Sat through the main event, rather predicatable really. In fact, very predicatable.
Chisora V Swaby had an edge, mainly due to the finish of course, but it was entertaining enough to watch.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 27 Sep 2008, 03:59
by banjo
steve689 wrote:Mark Birdis has really improved. Now he has learned to shout random words for added effect.
He is awful, easily the worst MC I've seen. He just shouts and seems all panicky, honestly it isn't that difficult is it? He's reading the important stuff from a card just like all the other MC's do yet he still manages to drop the odd clanger.
Awful, just awful and that's the end of it.
Re: Is this bill really going to be on television?
Posted: 27 Sep 2008, 04:19
by robster
boxrec wrote:Mark Burdis is ok. (even if it is because its a novelty "kev bev" advert thing)
He's better than Michael Pass!
http://www.michaelpass.org/
He's not ok, he's even stopped being a novelty. With his jacket gaping open and the scared look on his face, he looks like an uncle just about to read out the thank you's at a birthday party. I cringe when I listen to him murder an intro.
Next to him Michael Pass sounds like Michael Buffer