BoxRec

twenty six wrote:All hail Horse the font of all knowledge.
Will that do Sir ?

Yes, that will do.

stujones wrote:Hold on - so Hide misses out cause of a poor opponent, but Rhodes is in after a realitve struggle against Jamie Coyle?

Coyle had won his last 6 fights including wins over Delehedy and Butlin and has a record of 16-4-1. Hide beat Kosobokovs, who doesn't seem to have beaten anyone with more than one win and has a record of 12-10.

So, in my opinion the win over Coyle was the better result.

Stu,
Stick to criticising those in the list that ain't fought at all !
Al least Rhodes holds a belt is active and is winning.

Sorry 26, nothing personal against Rhodes - just for weeks you have been critical of Rhodes' exclusion and Horse has been adamant for his reasoning.

Personally I don't think beating Jamie Coyle, especially in the fashion that Rhodes did, warrants any gains in the list - whether he should have been in the top 30 in the prior to the fight is a different matter. Similarly with Danny Williams' frankly awful showing against McDermmott - that should not have resulted in gains.

Personally, I think Hides' win over May warranted a top 30 position and he has stayed active since.

metropol wrote:He is eligeble to fight for the british strap as many english men are entitled to fight for the irish belt, he is as irish as duddy and he wears a shamrock on his shorts ( i think ) which would indicate his Irishness.

The British title doesn't work in the same way as the Irish title though. I don't think there has ever been any serious talk about Duddy fighting for the British belt, so I think the situation is different with Lindsay.

Do you know if Lindsay holds a British or Irish passport?

Horse wrote:
Do you know if Lindsay holds a British or Irish passport?

I dont, but if you find out, make sure you let me know


Cheers

Still No John Murray Current British Lightweight Champion
Martin Lindsay has like John come off a good win and gets ranked but John does not ????????????

I can't believe anyone is still motivated or bothered to question the rationale for want of a better word of these lists

metropol wrote:

twenty six wrote:Tosser.

Whats the point of calling him a tosser , if you dont like the list or horse you should not look , id say you know it comes around every month.

I wouldn't give him too much credit.

twenty six wrote:Stu,
Stick to criticising those in the list that ain't fought at all !
Al least Rhodes holds a belt is active and is winning.

Who hasn't fought at all?

stujones wrote:Personally I don't think beating Jamie Coyle, especially in the fashion that Rhodes did, warrants any gains in the list - whether he should have been in the top 30 in the prior to the fight is a different matter. Similarly with Danny Williams' frankly awful showing against McDermmott - that should not have resulted in gains.

Their performances might not have been impressive, but at least they won and added another decent name to both of there records. I would rather have fighters win and look bad than not fight at all.

stujones wrote:Personally, I think Hides' win over May warranted a top 30 position and he has stayed active since.

Out of sight, out of mind. I haven't been watching Hide's recent fights, so perhaps I have not given him the credit he deserves. He's back in Britain now, so maybe I won't overlook him anymore.

Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:I dont, but if you find out, make sure you let me know


Cheers

I will do that.

tyson wrote:Still No John Murray Current British Lightweight Champion
Martin Lindsay has like John come off a good win and gets ranked but John does not ????????????

John Murray hasn't fought in the last month, so I couldn't add him into the top 30.

A win over Derry Mathews is better than a win over Lee Meager in my opinion, so that is the main reason why Lindsay is in the list and Murray isn't. Lindsay is also arguably the top featherweight in Britain, Murray is not the top lightweight.

Counter-puncher wrote:I can't believe anyone is still motivated or bothered to question the rationale for want of a better word of these lists

You can't believe "anyone is still motivated or bothered to question the rationale for want of a better word of these lists"?

Why not?