NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Andrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 167
Joined: 25 May 2004, 15:31

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by Andrey »

Is Cleverly fight over or not?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by stujones »

Yes it is over.
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by chinny »

Still no opponents named for the 31/10 bill in two weeks. Not one - thats eight TBA's!
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by TerribleTerry »

chinny wrote:Still no opponents named for the 31/10 bill in two weeks. Not one - thats eight TBA's!
£40 per ticket for 8 fights in a sports hall with all fighters facing TBA. :o

No wonder the domestic game is in such ruddy health with the nation's top promoter serving up such even matched compelling cards. :roll:

A week earlier, in a proper international standard venue (NIA) the UFC, for £25 a ticket, are giving fans 11 fights and they all are, at most, 60/40 fights:

Michael Bisping Vs. Chris Leben
Keith Jardine Vs. Brandon Vera
Rameau Sokoudjou Vs. Luiz Cane
Paul Taylor Vs. Chris Lytle
Paul Kelly Vs. Marcus Davis
Dan Hardy Vs. Akihiro Gono
Shane Carwin Vs. Neil Wain
Jess Liaudin Vs. David Bielkheden
Sam Stout Vs. Terry Etim
David Baron Vs. Jim Miller
Per Eklund Vs. Samy Schiavo

Most of that list wont mean anything to most of the people on here but take my word for it - there isnt a gimme amongst them.

Barry Hearn is right to be worried - domestic promoters just arent rising to the challenge at the moment. SN are resting on their laurels feeding us Brummies this 5hit card. They are relying on the fact that Macklin, Broadhurst and Costello (to a lesser degree) will sell loads of tickets because it is a novalty them fighting in their home town.

But long term will this dismissive attitude of fans help the sport grow?

Not a bit
WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by WildWaylon »

billy bessey wrote:
1southpaw wrote:
billy bessey wrote:JUST BEEN CHECKING OUT THE CLEVERLY OAKEY FIGHT ON PAPER THIS SEEMS A HALF DECENT MATCH UP BUT I DONT THINK IT WILL BE PRETTY TO WATCH AND TO BACK IT UP THERE IS AN ABSOLUTE PILE OF CRAP MATCH UPS ON THE UNDERCARD O.K THE HOME CORNER HAS SOME REAL GOOD PROSPECTS BUT THEIR OPPOSITION IS AWFUL. TAKE ALL OF THERE LAST 6 FIGHTS AND THE RECORD READS 5-43 THAT IS TERRIBLE IS IT NO WONDER THE GENERAL PUBLIC ARE TURNING TO M.M.A WHAT A LOAD OF SHIT I DONT KNOW HOW SKY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT ALL THE TIME I KNOW YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW MISMATCHES/BUILD UP/RECORD PADDING FIGHTS BUT THIS IS REALLY TAKING THE PEE AT LEAST WITH MALONEY/HENNESSEY YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW DECENT MATCH UPS SORT IT OUT FWANKY BOY NO WONDER YOU ARE LOSING YOUR GRIP YOU CAN FOOL SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME ALL OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME BUT NEVER ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME

bill how can you call any boxer crap you need to look a bit closer to home mate :shame:


ha ha ha fair one but as i said i post on here as a fan not a boxer and although the opposition may have been alright fighting there own standard it was a pointless exercise them contests taking place(espescially on sky t.v) if the away corner were fighting some of there own standard no matter how poor they were it would have made better viewing then the mismatches that took place take prizefighter for instance hardly any fight(sorry show) has captured the imagination of the public as much as this for ages and one of the best fights so far on it involved yours truly v dave ferguson not because were brilliant(far from it infact) but because of the fact that it was well matched and we both wanted to win when talking about the fight they dont mention that we both couldnt lace a top tenners boots i was fat he was unfit and why was that? because they were too interested in watching a good even even fight where both boxers gave there all so sky should take notice of fights like that and demand more even fights to keep the paying public happy it doesnt matter so much for fwank now because his time seems to be ending(espescially if bills continue to be as bad as this but the likes of hennesy e.t.c who are coming through will not be able to get the public back if this continues you have to have at least 3 decent match ups on sky bills and its just not happening on most bills
Absolutely true Billy, good points made and Fwank has nowhere to go if he gets booted out by Sky for crap bills.
kickyoasshot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 07:06

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by kickyoasshot »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
kickyoasshot wrote:I've just found a preview of tonights bill. It has a detailed preview of the undercard too. The Smith brothers from Liverpool all appear on it. But all seem to be mismatches

http://diamondboxing.com/newsstory.php?list=4182
You HAVE to be associated with that site. And are you trying to get SN creds or do you already have them?

One of the most boss-eyed, biased, puff pieces of utter shit I've ever laid my eyes on.

Read Bill's post then go and read that disgrace to internet journalism. Which is more accurate?

Some of us are trying to elevate the status of web writing. Santa Maria, I can't believe how bad that is.
I didn't say it was an accurate article did I! If you read the last sentence of my post you will see it reads 'all seem to be mismatches'. The article more or less says the same apart from the first and last paragraph. I agree, decent bills are very few and far between from certain promoters. So you can put your sword away now :roll:
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by twenty six »

TT,
I've had my belly of personal insults on this subject, so I'm trying to be uncontroversial, but I've heard Macklin is injured ?
I hope I'm wrong - genuinely - for the the fans.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by stujones »

Well, it must be a very annoying state of play for you guys in the Birmingham area thinking of going. What I am finding especially frustrating is that the Commonwealth title, a one time meaningful belt, is soon becoming the new WBU and simply being abused to sell the bill to the TV companies.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26442
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by banjo »

Is it true that sky will no longer entertain WBU fights and are just sticking with the traditional British, Commonwealth and Euro titles?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by leforge »

His bills are like this on all channels, the one on ITV were awful Williams v Harrison 2 I was there. Maloney bills tend to be better.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by stujones »

banjo wrote:Is it true that sky will no longer entertain WBU fights and are just sticking with the traditional British, Commonwealth and Euro titles?
Seems that way - but, when the Commonwealth belt can get manipulated like it has been is it any better?
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by dondada »

stujones wrote:
banjo wrote:Is it true that sky will no longer entertain WBU fights and are just sticking with the traditional British, Commonwealth and Euro titles?
Seems that way - but, when the Commonwealth belt can get manipulated like it has been is it any better?
Spot on, Stu.

The Commonwealth belt has gone so far down the pan it's sad. Not a major belt anymore, I'm afraid.
REAL_DEAL
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5028
Joined: 09 Jul 2003, 06:42

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by REAL_DEAL »

Billy have you got a call to fight Derek Chisora yet :DDD
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26442
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by banjo »

stujones wrote:
banjo wrote:Is it true that sky will no longer entertain WBU fights and are just sticking with the traditional British, Commonwealth and Euro titles?
Seems that way - but, when the Commonwealth belt can get manipulated like it has been is it any better?
True, but with no WBU belt to throw around some other belt is bound to suffer isn't it?
Dirk Kelly
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4971
Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by Dirk Kelly »

1southpaw wrote:
billy bessey wrote:JUST BEEN CHECKING OUT THE CLEVERLY OAKEY FIGHT ON PAPER THIS SEEMS A HALF DECENT MATCH UP BUT I DONT THINK IT WILL BE PRETTY TO WATCH AND TO BACK IT UP THERE IS AN ABSOLUTE PILE OF CRAP MATCH UPS ON THE UNDERCARD O.K THE HOME CORNER HAS SOME REAL GOOD PROSPECTS BUT THEIR OPPOSITION IS AWFUL. TAKE ALL OF THERE LAST 6 FIGHTS AND THE RECORD READS 5-43 THAT IS TERRIBLE IS IT NO WONDER THE GENERAL PUBLIC ARE TURNING TO M.M.A WHAT A LOAD OF SHIT I DONT KNOW HOW SKY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT ALL THE TIME I KNOW YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW MISMATCHES/BUILD UP/RECORD PADDING FIGHTS BUT THIS IS REALLY TAKING THE PEE AT LEAST WITH MALONEY/HENNESSEY YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW DECENT MATCH UPS SORT IT OUT FWANKY BOY NO WONDER YOU ARE LOSING YOUR GRIP YOU CAN FOOL SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME ALL OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME BUT NEVER ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME

bill how can you call any boxer crap you need to look a bit closer to home mate :shame:
What did Billy do to you - put you down in training?
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by dondada »

banjo wrote:
stujones wrote:
banjo wrote:Is it true that sky will no longer entertain WBU fights and are just sticking with the traditional British, Commonwealth and Euro titles?
Seems that way - but, when the Commonwealth belt can get manipulated like it has been is it any better?
True, but with no WBU belt to throw around some other belt is bound to suffer isn't it?
Not if the TV companies refuse to pay for poor matches. Perhaps Sky thought that the Commonwealth was some guarantee of quality. Understandable but as it turns out, absolutely wrong. I was told by Sky that they weren't minded to enter into long-term agreements with promoters anymore NOR put up with shite cards. Wrong on both counts, it seems.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by stujones »

It actually grates a little worst than the WBU situation... cause at least most of the people in boxing and the big fans (even the small fans) would just say "bollocks" and almost laugh it off, even though it is no laughing matter.... now a pretty prestigious belt, with some history, is being treated with contempt.

The WBU/IBO had no history and sometimes no champion - so when a Vacant title would just miraculously appear you couldn't really argue - now though underserving fighters (who are the favourite!) are fighting for it and their champions are just being told to vacate - it really just sucks.

I have no real problems with Cleveley vs Oakey. Oakey has been a champion and at least one of the fighters was legitimately scheduled to fight for the title against the champion on that day. But Burns vs Akaba and even worst Don Broadhurst (who isn't ready to fight for a title) against TBC!!!! we know the title will be on the line, but we don't even know the opponent! Its rediculous.

If Warren used the English/Celtic titles - which have topped TV bills in the past - then I wouldn't be half as pissed off.
boxerrob2005
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 190
Joined: 27 Apr 2005, 10:16

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by boxerrob2005 »

Stu you are spot on. I have been following boxing since I was about 9 or 10 and rarely miss any bills on TV but the Burns fight was that poor a match up i didnt even both to watch and i was actually at home!
I heard the york hall looked empty that night, dont know if true thats pretty embarrasing because the york hall is usually always at least 90% full. I guess the york hall crowd are too knowledgable to go to them type of bills.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by sweetscience »

Dirk Kelly wrote:
1southpaw wrote:
billy bessey wrote:JUST BEEN CHECKING OUT THE CLEVERLY OAKEY FIGHT ON PAPER THIS SEEMS A HALF DECENT MATCH UP BUT I DONT THINK IT WILL BE PRETTY TO WATCH AND TO BACK IT UP THERE IS AN ABSOLUTE PILE OF CRAP MATCH UPS ON THE UNDERCARD O.K THE HOME CORNER HAS SOME REAL GOOD PROSPECTS BUT THEIR OPPOSITION IS AWFUL. TAKE ALL OF THERE LAST 6 FIGHTS AND THE RECORD READS 5-43 THAT IS TERRIBLE IS IT NO WONDER THE GENERAL PUBLIC ARE TURNING TO M.M.A WHAT A LOAD OF SHIT I DONT KNOW HOW SKY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT ALL THE TIME I KNOW YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW MISMATCHES/BUILD UP/RECORD PADDING FIGHTS BUT THIS IS REALLY TAKING THE PEE AT LEAST WITH MALONEY/HENNESSEY YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW DECENT MATCH UPS SORT IT OUT FWANKY BOY NO WONDER YOU ARE LOSING YOUR GRIP YOU CAN FOOL SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME ALL OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME BUT NEVER ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME

bill how can you call any boxer crap you need to look a bit closer to home mate :shame:
What did Billy do to you - put you down in training?
billy...training.... ???? same sentence ?????
boxingchat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by boxingchat »

Billy didn't fool anyone at prizefighter, only himself!
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by Chambers2 »

boxingchat wrote:Billy didn't fool anyone at prizefighter, only himself!
Any news on what's happening on the Kel Brook fight?
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by twenty six »

See the other thread mate.
14-11-08.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by J »

boxingchat wrote:Billy didn't fool anyone at prizefighter, only himself!
Id pay to see Billy slap you around foir 4 rounds, perhaps in these days of desperation at SN that could headline one of your shows.

Its a better start than what was on offer on this bill.

you reap what you fcuking sow huh
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by TerribleTerry »

26 I have had it confirmed that Macklin is fit and ready to fight the fearsome TBA on the 31st so that is something at least - the headline fight might still be a pathetic joke but at least the local lads will get a run out even if it is in marking time fights. What is Dean Powell doing that means he cant announce the opponents less than 2 weeks from the first bell? I know the general lack of sun means more time on the sun beds than usual, but this is taking the mickey!
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!

Post by twenty six »

TT,
Thanks for that mate, we need to be thankful for small mercies.
Post Reply