BoxRec

rhino222 wrote:rod marsh got the book thrown at him for his 'toon-army' gag.... and ron atkinson has remained submerged since his racist outburst with the microphone still on when he thought it was off...

i feel that this outburst from ross and brand is far worse than eith offence....they should be sacked. they are both rich already, so it will not ruin their lives. but lets hope the public rebel against them in jade baddy style !!!!!!!

Chambers2 wrote:I agree that it wasn't funny and was Bullyish against a senior citizen, but for this to be on the front pages and a headline news story is ridiculous.

I don't particularly dislike Brand, but I'd love to go 6 3 minute rounds with Wossy (I'm a pacifist who'd be giving away about 4 stone) the overpaid annoying cuntt

Carbo wrote:

rhino222 wrote:rod marsh got the book thrown at him for his 'toon-army' gag.... and ron atkinson has remained submerged since his racist outburst with the microphone still on when he thought it was off...

i feel that this outburst from ross and brand is far worse than eith offence....they should be sacked. they are both rich already, so it will not ruin their lives. but lets hope the public rebel against them in jade baddy style !!!!!!!

You think that a bad taste joke is worse than hurling a racist insult on primetime tv?

this is a storm in a teacup. I feel like flagellating myself even for bothering with this. Try worrying about the real issues of whether we’re all going to be queuing in soup lines in eight months, or weather that gibbering buffoon in the White House, Wubya, is going to do something else stupid, like start a war with Iran.

boxrec wrote:

Lenny wrote:It's not support for Ross or Brand, more a realisation there is a lot more for people to use their energy worrying about.

Agreed, but it shouldn't be completely ignored either. And if they were allowed to continue to act like thugs, and get away with it, the general public will follow suit. (although alot of people do that anyway)

banjo wrote:I despise rich people, especially ones that have no talent like Brand and Woss, lol that shows how thick he is 'cause he can't even say "R"

I got paid £17K per year for putting my balls on the line yet some nancy boy and a long haired prick(or should that be pwick ) get paid millions for naff all

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

banjo wrote:I despise rich people, especially ones that have no talent like Brand and Woss, lol that shows how thick he is 'cause he can't even say "R"

I got paid £17K per year for putting my balls on the line yet some nancy boy and a long haired prick(or should that be pwick ) get paid millions for naff all

They've no talent - which is why Russell Brand has sell out tours, and Ross's show has some of the highest viewing figures on terrestrial TV.

They are paid what the market will bear, just like footballers, singers, and other entertainers.

You chose a career that paid you 17k a year, nobody forced you - why didn't you go and become a chat show host if it is so easy. It's easy to criticise, but why don't you have a go at getting up on Camera and performing to cue, I've had to do it once, and it's far from bloody easy to do it and look natural, and be amusing and hit all yours cues.

Envy is a wasted emotion.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

banjo wrote:I despise rich people, especially ones that have no talent like Brand and Woss, lol that shows how thick he is 'cause he can't even say "R"

I got paid £17K per year for putting my balls on the line yet some nancy boy and a long haired prick(or should that be pwick ) get paid millions for naff all

They've no talent - which is why Russell Brand has sell out tours, and Ross's show has some of the highest viewing figures on terrestrial TV.

They are paid what the market will bear, just like footballers, singers, and other entertainers.

You chose a career that paid you 17k a year, nobody forced you - why didn't you go and become a chat show host if it is so easy. It's easy to criticise, but why don't you have a go at getting up on Camera and performing to cue, I've had to do it once, and it's far from bloody easy to do it and look natural, and be amusing and hit all yours cues.

Envy is a wasted emotion.

jamesmcdonnell wrote: Does occur to me that one of two things has happened here.

1 Brand got word of her flogging her story to the papers via his agent, and so decideed to make a pre-emptive strike.

2 The whole thing is a publicity stunt wherby he agreed to make the lewd comments to boost her profile after she noshed him off.

Carbo wrote:Besides which, 17K a year is incredibly wealthy by world standards.

banjo wrote:

Carbo wrote:Besides which, 17K a year is incredibly wealthy by world standards.

Oh yeah, bloody fortune isn't it.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Yeah, they both deserve a slap. Not just because of this - because they are a pair of kents.

Loads of people were ringing up Radio 5 giving different opinions and if I could have been arsed, my point would have been 'I don't object to them being paid this much and acting lewdly. I object (in the case of Ross) being paid so much because he's sh1t.'

He used to be good but is now shot to bits as an interviewer. He either fawns embarrassingly or is needlessly vulgar.

Some on here might know I take a particular interest in defamation/libel (mainly because I've had to 8) ). Wossy is so sensitive over criticism of him ripping off the licence fee payer with his exorbitant salary that he's reportedly had his lawyers, Carter Ruck, send a few 'cease and desist' letters out to people who have simply given a fair opinion - no libel whatsoever, w*nker, so shut the feck up.

I actually wish any of my grandparents were still alive on the outside chance of Brand/Woss insulting them so I could give the pair of them a flying headbutt. Each, of course.

I actually disagree with you, I think Ross interviews are excellent , his irreverent style is infinitely more entertaining than the multitude of dire product placement interviews we are usuaully treated to. He also does ask some pertinent questions of his guests on occasion, and some probing ones too.

Ross is a very articulate and charming host, and if you watch his film programme(s), you get to see the best of him.

You have to accept Ian, that the days of the Parky Style interview are over, in large part they don't work because the public already know too much about the interview subjects, due to the proliferation of gossip magazines and other drear publications, and the fact that people are such media whores these days.

It used to be a real coup when Parkinson would get some big hollywood star like Gregory Peck over, because british audiences knew so little about the real person behind the icon, but that kind of interview would fall flat on it's arse today, because all the big stars are far too accessible.

Ross' style of interview suits this era, and I would challenge you to find another superior interviewer in this country who covers the entertainment industry.

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Yeah, they both deserve a slap. Not just because of this - because they are a pair of kents.

Loads of people were ringing up Radio 5 giving different opinions and if I could have been arsed, my point would have been 'I don't object to them being paid this much and acting lewdly. I object (in the case of Ross) being paid so much because he's sh1t.'

He used to be good but is now shot to bits as an interviewer. He either fawns embarrassingly or is needlessly vulgar.

Some on here might know I take a particular interest in defamation/libel (mainly because I've had to 8) ). Wossy is so sensitive over criticism of him ripping off the licence fee payer with his exorbitant salary that he's reportedly had his lawyers, Carter Ruck, send a few 'cease and desist' letters out to people who have simply given a fair opinion - no libel whatsoever, w*nker, so shut the feck up.

I actually wish any of my grandparents were still alive on the outside chance of Brand/Woss insulting them so I could give the pair of them a flying headbutt. Each, of course.

I actually disagree with you, I think Ross interviews are excellent , his irreverent style is infinitely more entertaining than the multitude of dire product placement interviews we are usuaully treated to. He also does ask some pertinent questions of his guests on occasion, and some probing ones too.

Ross is a very articulate and charming host, and if you watch his film programme(s), you get to see the best of him.

You have to accept Ian, that the days of the Parky Style interview are over, in large part they don't work because the public already know too much about the interview subjects, due to the proliferation of gossip magazines and other drear publications, and the fact that people are such media whores these days.

It used to be a real coup when Parkinson would get some big hollywood star like Gregory Peck over, because british audiences knew so little about the real person behind the icon, but that kind of interview would fall flat on it's arse today, because all the big stars are far too accessible.

Ross' style of interview suits this era, and I would challenge you to find another superior interviewer in this country who covers the entertainment industry.

After dwelling on your postulation for some time, I've come to this conclusion.

Ross is a w*nker.

I take your point, give the people what they want and all that. I realise increasingly that I'm not 'most people'. There's hardly a thing on BBC1 that I'm bothered about.

As for your challenge to find a superior interviewer, there is a direct analogy with British heavyweights. Even the 'good' ones are shit, if you get my drift.

'Pertinent' and 'probing' are not words I associate with Wossy though.

sg1985 wrote:

banjo wrote:

Carbo wrote:Besides which, 17K a year is incredibly wealthy by world standards.

Oh yeah, bloody fortune isn't it.

As for envy

I own my own house, have a beautiful girlfriend and we're expecting our first child. I have everything a man would want D

that would only be 9 grand in england, ha less than minimum wage

EddieShredder wrote:

sg1985 wrote:that would only be 9 grand in england, ha less than minimum wage

Firstly, he is in England - so it is £17k.

Secondly, laughing at someones income, whatever it is, is a c@nts trick.

banjo wrote:

EddieShredder wrote:

sg1985 wrote:that would only be 9 grand in england, ha less than minimum wage

Firstly, he is in England - so it is £17k.

Secondly, laughing at someones income, whatever it is, is a c@nts trick.

Especially when you consider that used to be my wage and I'm now closer to £35K a year D

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote: After dwelling on your postulation for some time, I've come to this conclusion.

Ross is a w*nker.

I take your point, give the people what they want and all that. I realise increasingly that I'm not 'most people'. There's hardly a thing on BBC1 that I'm bothered about.

As for your challenge to find a superior interviewer, there is a direct analogy with British heavyweights. Even the 'good' ones are shit, if you get my drift.
'Pertinent' and 'probing' are not words I associate with Wossy though.

EddieShredder wrote:
that would only be 9 grand in england, ha less than minimum wage