Re: tyson-savon 1993: your pick
Posted: 11 Dec 2012, 10:41
x2Goodnight, Irene wrote:Savon wouldn't have a prayer. Not a prayer.
x2Goodnight, Irene wrote:Savon wouldn't have a prayer. Not a prayer.
Ali won Gold in 60 and fought Liston in 64.man wrote:well, yes. but then we have foreman, ali, wlad, just to name a fewGrimm wrote:Amateur boxing is almost a different sport than pro boxing from the scoring to the headgear to the weight of the gloves and even the amount of rounds.
Tyson vs. Savon in a professional boxing match would end sort of like Tyson vs. Spinks.
You know who else was a great amateur?
Someone who beat Stevenson in the amateurs as well as Tyson?
Craig Payne.
As a pro he accomplished nothing, being a good amateur does not translate in to being a good professional.
olympic champions who did well at the pros ... and they did not
need too much time to adjust for the pro-world.
while i basically agree with the huge difference of amateur versus
pros, i think there is once in a while extraordinary talent that can
quickly adjust for it. and my guess is that savon fell in that category.
and if you will, let savon turn pro in 1993 and let him meet tyson
in 1995 behind bars. this is just hypothetical anyways, i do not know
why some guys here insist on weird detail ...
final thing: we are talking cuba here. i guess their amateur scene
is somewhat different from other parts of the world, simply because
there is no pro-world. thus the huge talents remain ... amateurs.
He isn't saying it prevents you from being a good pro.man wrote:final note. you make some logic mistake here IMHO. while "being a goodGrimm wrote:... being a good amateur does not translate in to being a good professional.
amateur does not translate in to being a good professional" necessarily,
it does not do the opposite either: prevent from being a good professional.
as many examples show ...
Yes.The Dark Destroyer wrote:Was Tyson not in prison in 93?