Page 2 of 2

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 05:00
by Adamj1987
why does he have to speak in third person all the time????????????? because adamj1987 belives that is annoying

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 06:59
by Goz
sg1985 wrote:
Goz wrote:I'm getting pretty bored of him now I must be honest.

I've gone in a year from someone who was looking to go to Vegas to watch him fight Mayweather (and would have had the ticket prices not been scandalous) to not even bothering to buy the PPV tomorrow because I don't feel PPV is justified for this.

And Sky are getting on my tits with their crappy cliched coverage of the build up too.
you wouldnt feel like that if he hadnt lost, you'll say thats not the case but it is
Hmmm interesting point and one I hadn't considered.

I guess Hatton losing has had an impact on how I feel and if Hatton was fighting Paulie Malliwhathisface on Saturday still unbeaten with a win over Mayweather on his ledger it would kind of make it more interesting to me.

But that's the point. He did lose and has done nothing since then so in my opinion hasn't beaten a top top fighter since 2005.

So this fight is not worth PPV to Goz and to me now Ricky seems to be trading more on 'my amazing fans' than his ability as top possible p4p rated fighter.

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 07:18
by Goz
sg1985 wrote:

am i wrong but isnt mallignagi considered the second best super lightweight after hatton?

this is a big fight, not the biggest ever at the weight like someone said in another thread but it is interesting. i dont think hatton should fight dlh, i would be much more interested in seeing him face pacquiao or juan manuel marquez or even cotto. if hatton can win and hasnt lost it like alot of people think (i dont) there is some really good fights left for him in the next year or two before he retires
I think you're getting away from the point of the thread dude. The Hatton circus is boring people a bit, myself included.

Maybe Saturdays fight will go some way to putting him back on the map as a real fighter - I'll be downloading the next day to find out!

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 07:25
by Khaosai-Galaxy
sg1985 wrote:
Goz wrote:
sg1985 wrote:I'm getting pretty bored of him now I must be honest.

I've gone in a year from someone who was looking to go to Vegas to watch him fight Mayweather (and would have had the ticket prices not been scandalous) to not even bothering to buy the PPV tomorrow because I don't feel PPV is justified for this.

And Sky are getting on my tits with their crappy cliched coverage of the build up too.
you wouldnt feel like that if he hadnt lost, you'll say thats not the case but it is
Hmmm interesting point and one I hadn't considered.

I guess Hatton losing has had an impact on how I feel and if Hatton was fighting Paulie Malliwhathisface on Saturday still unbeaten with a win over Mayweather on his ledger it would kind of make it more interesting to me.

But that's the point. He did lose and has done nothing since then so in my opinion hasn't beaten a top top fighter since 2005.

So this fight is not worth PPV to Goz and to me now Ricky seems to be trading more on 'my amazing fans' than his ability as top possible p4p rated fighter.


am i wrong but isnt mallignagi considered the second best super lightweight after hatton?

this is a big fight, not the biggest ever at the weight like someone said in another thread but it is interesting. i dont think hatton should fight dlh, i would be much more interested in seeing him face pacquiao or juan manuel marquez or even cotto. if hatton can win and hasnt lost it like alot of people think (i dont) there is some really good fights left for him in the next year or two before he retires


Well quite, its a very competetive fight between 2 top 5 140 pounders, sadly the old women brigade arent interested in this fight because they dont like Hatton's personality or his voice, or because he repeats himself in interviews or fornicate knows what....


Interesting to note its the same whinging old women who weren't interested in Calzaghe - Jones because it wasnt a "competetive matchup"...

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 07:29
by Poncey
Interesting that Bradley wants to fight Hatton. Shame it can't be a (whisper it) unifier.

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 08:15
by Goz
sg1985 wrote:

you said:

"So this fight is not worth PPV to Goz and to me now Ricky seems to be trading more on 'my amazing fans' than his ability as top possible p4p rated fighter."

and i was making the point the fight is a genuine ppv fight. well compared to some ppv fights that have been on recently (amir khan) come on
Absolutely - Khan was the biggest rip off in the history of televised sport in the UK in my opinion.

I think the £50+ a month I already give Sky should get me this fight though. That's my prerogative - it's not worth £15 to me.

I understand why I might need to stump up when they are putting together a mega-fight like the PBF one but not this, not for me.

The Lazcano PPV was worse though, at least as you say this is between the 2 arguably best Light Welters out there.

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 08:22
by Poncey
Can't pirate on Virgin bband :shame:

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 08:29
by Goz
sg1985 wrote:

you pay fifty quid a month? you should change to virgin i get phone, internet, tele with sky sports 1,2,3 & movies for £38 a month, setanta is free to cos of the deal i got
Would love to but I don't live in a Virgin cabled area. Sky is the only option.

With Setanta I pay over £60 a month.

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 08:33
by banjo
What makes a fight qualify for PPV?

An example is DLH-Mayweather which we recieved on normal sky, yet we had to pay £15 for Mayweather-Hatton. Alright I know DLH was past it and would have sparked the loudmouth 10 years ago but surely DLH-Mayweather is a bigger fight.

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 08:35
by Goz
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:

Well quite, its a very competetive fight between 2 top 5 140 pounders, sadly the old women brigade arent interested in this fight because they dont like Hatton's personality or his voice, or because he repeats himself in interviews or eff knows what....


Interesting to note its the same whinging old women who weren't interested in Calzaghe - Jones because it wasnt a "competetive matchup"...
Whilst I accept the fight is decent - there is something 'plastic' about it to me as well.

Sky showing that 'magic man' documentary ad nauseum, Mayweather Senior's crappy poems on SSN all day and also I don't really think Malliwhatshisface's record stands up to much scrutiny either - it's basically a brave defeat to Cotto and some contentious decisions over adverseries that Hatton would be criticised for fighting. And that's about it.

It's a turn off for me.

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 16:07
by DG.
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Abbo wrote:Honestly Galaxy, you know exactly the point being made. Hatton blatantly milks this character as he believes it sells.

Hatton - Lazcano, 55,000 tickets sold, biggest ticket seller in world boxing


It does sell

And how many do you think are on the BNP list? I hear he has a lot of racists following him, any truth?


:D

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 16:08
by DG.
Adamj1987 wrote:why does he have to speak in third person all the time????????????? because adamj1987 belives that is annoying

DG thinks the same and you would never catch DG doing that.



:D

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 16:10
by DG.
Goz wrote:
sg1985 wrote:

you said:

"So this fight is not worth PPV to Goz and to me now Ricky seems to be trading more on 'my amazing fans' than his ability as top possible p4p rated fighter."

and i was making the point the fight is a genuine ppv fight. well compared to some ppv fights that have been on recently (amir khan) come on
Absolutely - Khan was the biggest rip off in the history of televised sport in the UK in my opinion.

I think the £50+ a month I already give Sky should get me this fight though. That's my prerogative - it's not worth £15 to me.

I understand why I might need to stump up when they are putting together a mega-fight like the PBF one but not this, not for me.

The Lazcano PPV was worse though, at least as you say this is between the 2 arguably best Light Welters out there.
I am going to call SKY and emand this fight for free or I cancel!

Even then I am not watching it live.


:D

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 16:17
by Khaosai-Galaxy
DG. wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Abbo wrote:Honestly Galaxy, you know exactly the point being made. Hatton blatantly milks this character as he believes it sells.

Hatton - Lazcano, 55,000 tickets sold, biggest ticket seller in world boxing


It does sell

And how many do you think are on the BNP list? I hear he has a lot of racists following him, any truth?


:D
None, NONE of them are on the list


Only men of pure socialist heart follow Ricky Hatton

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 20 Nov 2008, 16:51
by Gray-Fox
banjo wrote:What makes a fight qualify for PPV?

An example is DLH-Mayweather which we recieved on normal sky, yet we had to pay £15 for Mayweather-Hatton. Alright I know DLH was past it and would have sparked the loudmouth 10 years ago but surely DLH-Mayweather is a bigger fight.
DLH would never have sparked Floyd.

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 21 Nov 2008, 08:40
by Counter-puncher
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:



Well quite, its a very competetive fight between 2 top 5 140 pounders, sadly the old women brigade arent interested in this fight because they dont like Hatton's personality or his voice, or because he repeats himself in interviews or eff knows what....


Interesting to note its the same whinging old women who weren't interested in Calzaghe - Jones because it wasnt a "competetive matchup"...
for the record KG I wasn't interested in Jones Calzaghe for the reason you give but i am interested in Hatton - Paulie

hope that helps x x

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 21 Nov 2008, 11:30
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
DG. wrote:
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Abbo wrote:Honestly Galaxy, you know exactly the point being made. Hatton blatantly milks this character as he believes it sells.

Hatton - Lazcano, 55,000 tickets sold, biggest ticket seller in world boxing


It does sell

And how many do you think are on the BNP list? I hear he has a lot of racists following him, any truth?


:D
Was that after you went through the BNP list and kept seeing under hobbies: Going to Ricky Hatton fights

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 21 Nov 2008, 14:56
by E
"I see my Dad's here. Tiny he is. The only man who's got a full size photo in his passport"

"and there's me girlfriend Jennifer. What a babe. You seen the film...."

boom boom.

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 21 Nov 2008, 15:27
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Its easy to be an internet cynic moaning like an old women on a forum.




But its much much more difficult to fit a whole lime under your foreskin.

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 21 Nov 2008, 16:03
by Gray-Fox
Malignaggi's got a bad hand.

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 21 Nov 2008, 16:06
by frankwarrenfan
he nicked the passport joke from ronnie corbett

write your own material ricky!

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 21 Nov 2008, 16:22
by Abbo
frankwarrenfan wrote:he nicked the passport joke from ronnie corbett

write your own material ricky!
Harsh.

"See that doubled up body shot, he's nicked that from Mike McCallum he has.."

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 22 Nov 2008, 10:13
by oliverfennell
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Interesting to note its the same whinging old women who weren't interested in Calzaghe - Jones because it wasnt a "competetive matchup"...
Need I point out that in the event, it WASN'T... :roll:

Re: Ricky Hatton's Cliches

Posted: 22 Nov 2008, 10:20
by Autobarn
I misread this thread at first. Thought it was going to be a celebration of Ricky "Hugman" Hatton's best clinches.

Are his clinches becoming cliches?

Lost their meaning and impact through repetition?