BoxRec

You are full of shit....but you are funny.

Bottom Line: Terry Norris UD Ray Leonard

Hector Camacho KO 5 Ray Leonard

That's enough to destroy anyone's reputation

Elton John wrote:Hector Camacho KO 5 Ray Leonard

You really proved you are a tool by even mentioning this bout.

You gotta give it to Camacho.....he is the only southpaw who was worth a crap.

JCS wrote:

Elton John wrote:Hector Camacho KO 5 Ray Leonard

You really proved you are a tool by even mentioning this bout.

Why? It was one old man vs. another. Hector was just better that's why he won. I've always said that

Elton John wrote:

JCS wrote:

Elton John wrote:Hector Camacho KO 5 Ray Leonard

You really proved you are a tool by even mentioning this bout.

Why? It was one old man vs. another. Hector was just better that's why he won. I've always said that

Billy Joel says he wants to box your ass off.

Jaywheel wrote:
Billy Joel says he wants to box your ass off.

Billy Joel is not in my class

Elton John wrote:

Jaywheel wrote:
Billy Joel says he wants to box your ass off.

Billy Joel is not in my class

What class is that?.......

The "No Class".....class.

Elton John wrote:

ringsider wrote:So then all those who beat Terry Norris are great?


I'm confused again

I would exclude the times he lost on foul or was past his prime.

hmm. interesting. you exclude post-peak performances for Norris. and yet not for certain other fighters. Windup boy, at least be consistent in your little windups.

ringsider wrote:
What class is that?.......

The "No Class".....class.

The elite class my dear idiot

Counter-puncher wrote:
hmm. interesting. you exclude post-peak performances for Norris. and yet not for certain other fighters. Windup boy, at least be consistent in your little windups.

Let's face it-Norris without the fouls was nigh unbeatable. Jackson just had his number but the rest were as a result of Norris himself. That wasnt the real Norris you saw in there. Getting careless or fighting the wrong fight cost him. When he was right and followed the plan as outlined by his braintrust, Norris would CRUISE to victory every time ala, the Leonard fight, the rematch with Brown.

And who cares about the last couple fights? Terry was double checking to see what he had left.

that wasn't the real Leonard you saw in there with Norris.

Elton John wrote:Bottom Line: Terry Norris UD Ray Leonard

Hector Camacho KO 5 Ray Leonard

That's enough to destroy anyone's reputation

Bottom Line: Terry Norris L TKO Mullings 9
Terry Norris L 10 Dana Rosenblatt
Terry Norris L TKO Lauren Bouduani 9

that's enough to destroy anyone's reputation, no?

Counter-puncher wrote:that wasn't the real Leonard you saw in there with Norris.

He was winning wasn't he? And a huge favorite on top of that.

11 years without a loss and Terry beat him-no sweat!

As I said previously, Terry was able to overcome adversity and Leonard wasn't. Terry took Ray's best in rounds one and two but Ray couldnt do the same. That's why Terry won and Leonard lost.

Counter-puncher wrote:

Elton John wrote:Bottom Line: Terry Norris UD Ray Leonard

Hector Camacho KO 5 Ray Leonard

That's enough to destroy anyone's reputation

Bottom Line: Terry Norris L TKO Mullings 9
Terry Norris L 10 Dana Rosenblatt
Terry Norris L TKO Lauren Bouduani 9

that's enough to destroy anyone's reputation, no?

No. A losing streak is PROOF POSITIVE the fighter is no longer fit to be in the ring

Now, how does that compare with 11 straight years of wins over the decade's best? It doesn't.

As for Ray's loss to Hector Camacho; part of it can be blamed on the layoff, part of it due to Hector and his aggressive strategy and the fact he was out to destroy Leonard, and let's not forget the kind of condition he was left in after the carnage from his last fight.

BRAVO

do you do weddings/ christenings/ bar mitzvah's?

Counter-puncher wrote:BRAVO

do you do weddings/ christenings/ bar mitzvah's?

I have no idea what you're getting at.