Re: Before I get tickets to Barrera v Khan...
Posted: 24 Jan 2009, 11:58
got my ticket 
It's how they do it.Yeah, I'd say you have a point there. Also it seems that different ticket sellers have tickets for different blocks etc.
The claim of 15 000 might mean 15 000 tickets have been bought buy ticketmaster and the like?
Cheers. I've asked Nate's Promoter for a comment as he posts on Current Scene and seems a nice dude.Neri wrote:Nate Campbell still believes Barrera is his WBO mandatory challenger.
I thought Don King was still Campbell's promoter :??Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Cheers. I've asked Nate's Promoter for a comment as he posts on Current Scene and seems a nice dude.Neri wrote:Nate Campbell still believes Barrera is his WBO mandatory challenger.
http://www.dispatch.co.za/article.aspx?id=285455Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:http://www.badlefthook.com/2008/10/5/62 ... clares-ban
Funeka said Campbell could forget about fighting the Marquez-Diaz winner or Barrera as he will be contemplating retirement after February 14.
βI see that Campbell will be 37- years-old soon and he has had quite a career, but after I deal with him I am not sure Don King (his promoter) will be able to recycle him,β he said.
βIt will be like he had been fed into a meatgrinder.β
Ant Evans wrote:I call "bullshit" on the 15,000 claim. Khan sold around 3800 for last "fight" at MEN. So 11,000 plus people in the UK are desperate to see Barrera?
Bollocks.
Maybe you get your cash back if it's not a world championship either?Ant Evans wrote:
By the way, I just went ticketmaster and it states the show is called "World Championship Boxing - Amir Khan v Marco Antonio Barrera" which implies that if you buy ticket and Khan don't fight Barrera you gets your money back.
Great fight where anything could happen, I feel.
Tickets are sold subject to the venue or Event Partner's right to alter or vary the programme due to events or circumstances beyond its reasonable control without being obliged to refund monies or exchange tickets.
Barrera is clearly a draw, though, moreover this DOES sound like a good fight, with a good undercard, I think tickets sales should be decent enough.Ant Evans wrote:It is exactly before I know what the Brodie crowds were like that I know what Khan got. Entire second tier was blacked out, and only half the lower tier had people in it with tons of empty seats. I remember Warren laughing at Hearn's Brodie shows too, how the mighty have fallen eh?leforge wrote:I thought he did 6000 last time there. I remember Warren slagging off Brodie attendence of about 5000 so thats not much difference to Khan!
It's not for any title. At least, Boxrec don't have it down as being for one. This is supposed to be a 'keep busy' fight. The opponent, John Nolasco, is a guy who's not fought a decent opponent since 2005, and only had 2 fights since then which were over a year ago.winkveron wrote:So Barrera is definitely fighting on 31st Jan? And wasn't that fight for an interim world title? If so how the hell will he be fighting 6 weeks later! He must really rate Khan to give himself 6 weeks rest/preparation time!!!
Ant Evans wrote:I call "bullshit" on the 15,000 claim. Khan sold around 3800 for last "fight" at MEN. So 11,000 plus people in the UK are desperate to see Barrera?
Bollocks.
You cant believe everything you read on Fightspews.Terence wrote:"It has always been an ambition of mine to fight at the MEN. Especially in a mega fight with my good friend Ricky Hatton, although I was surprise, and saddened, to hear about his tanning accident, his hair dye debacle, and his conversion to Islam. I look forward to this fight."Abbo wrote:Any words yet from Barrera? I mean actual quotes.
From Fightspews.com
He's screwed from both ends really, not personable enough to appeal to the casuals, fleeing the car crash turned a lot of people off him and he pissed off the boxing fans with his world title within a year crap .Ant Evans wrote:I think so, too. I like the kid, but realise lots of others don't. The BBC Radio show after his loss was all the proof you need that guy on the street types loath him.leforge wrote:Khan is not very likeable thats why he struggles to get big crowd at venues. The attendence for Limond fight at 02 was 8,000 or so. Is this on box office again?
All sorts of stories about which TV this will be on doing the rounds.
I think he's a decent enough kid. The reason a lot of hardcore boxing fans wanted him to get starched was because they were/are sick of being sold shite as sandwiches. SN and TV companies talking him up - and even worse, his level of opposition up at times - is simply insulting. It might be their job to do so but that doesn't make it any more palletable.mrbassie wrote:He's screwed from both ends really, not personable enough to appeal to the casuals, fleeing the car crash turned a lot of people off him and he pissed off the boxing fans with his world title within a year crap .Ant Evans wrote:I think so, too. I like the kid, but realise lots of others don't. The BBC Radio show after his loss was all the proof you need that guy on the street types loath him.leforge wrote:Khan is not very likeable thats why he struggles to get big crowd at venues. The attendence for Limond fight at 02 was 8,000 or so. Is this on box office again?
All sorts of stories about which TV this will be on doing the rounds.
mrbassie wrote:He's screwed from both ends really, not personable enough to appeal to the casuals, fleeing the car crash turned a lot of people off him and he pissed off the boxing fans with his world title within a year crap .Ant Evans wrote:I think so, too. I like the kid, but realise lots of others don't. The BBC Radio show after his loss was all the proof you need that guy on the street types loath him.leforge wrote:Khan is not very likeable thats why he struggles to get big crowd at venues. The attendence for Limond fight at 02 was 8,000 or so. Is this on box office again?
All sorts of stories about which TV this will be on doing the rounds.