BoxRec

Should be a good final, Dilks is the only boxer in this. Oakey should win, though, if he's not knackered. How long is the break?

WHAT!! How hard is it to get a card with only three rounds right! Poor Dilks!

MASSIVE NEWS

Dilks is out STUBBS will box in the final

THey got the scorecards wrong!!!!

Crikey, what weird goings on? Hmmmmm. I had it for Dilks, close but clear.

They said two of the people totting it up got it wrong. If you can't add up three rounds they should not be officiating.

THEY WANT THEIR FCKING NECKS WRINGING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


JOhnny Nelson is muttering something about human error..........FCK OFF!!.............it's 3 rounds to add up!!!!! 3 Fcking rounds.

I thought they looked a bit fcking unorganised when I was watching tot up Dilks vs. Ajisafe........maybe they were trying to diddle Dilks then.

Good for Stubbs he's a nice lad and a hard worker...but I expect Dilks is too for that matter.

Shouldn't take any attention for one second away from the scoring though.....UTTERLY FCKING INEPT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(I've just ripped up my betting slip on Ajisafe...........I better get the fcker out the bin he may end up winning this fckin tourney yet)

Absolutely ridiculous, Dilks won every round and now he's been replaced in the final.

REMOTE HAS JUST HIT THE F*CKING WALL.

Lol at the old bald chav thinking he can rave.

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Lol at the old bald chav thinking he can rave.

Can you believe the fvck up here. Loved the way everyone just said "oh, a mistake, only two boxers, only 3 rounds, could happen to anyone" Yeah right.

Flicked it over after the decision was announced in the Dilks/Stubbs fight, flicked it back on when they were coming out, saw Stubbs being announced and wondered if I'd had a few too many ales. What a daft set of pillocks

Pecsaetan wrote:Flicked it over after the decision was announced in the Dilks/Stubbs fight, flicked it back on when they were coming out, saw Stubbs being announced and wondered if I'd had a few too many ales. What a daft set of pillocks

Not you I don't think... although some other guys might have.

Stubbs is knackered. Dilks would have been a fresher and better opponent.

Was Stubbs-Dilks really such a massive robbery?

Did you not have Dilks winning? If so, then yes!

Dilks comfortably won the first.

The second two he absorbed the pressure, hardly got tagged whilst countering with clean shots. Ridiculous.

steve689 wrote:Was Stubbs-Dilks really such a massive robbery?

Yes

That was a complete fix of ridiculous proportions. There definitely needs to be an investigation into this, it's absolutely scadelous they can be so currupt. Not one, but TWO judges totted up their scorecards wrong, yeah righto and then pass it off as humum error ? I find it fornicating insulting.

Dilkes won the fight easily, yes stubbs kept coming forward but his workrate and quality was poor.

Do they think the viewers are stupid or what ? Those judges should never officiate ever again.

I thought it was entertaining, much better than the non-live undercard stuff they usually show on Friday Fight Night.

Really unfortunate for Stubbs that his win wasn't announced properly , must have been hard for him to get his mind right for the final when he thought he was out. Ruined it a bit that did.

I liked the tourney- always good fun to watch!

well done tony oakey, i knew 7/1 was value

i thought he won all his fights quite clearly

What the F*CK i went to bed and missed all the controversy, the only talking point of the night was that they got the scoring wrong.

What the F*CK i went to bed and missed all the controversy, the only talking point of the night was that they got the scoring wrong.

Spartacus looked fat and disinterested - time to hang them up I think.

I'd love to see Oakey vs Cleverley 2 - with that Oakey in the ring. Must have one of the best "natural" stamina in British boxing today. He just seemed to be throwing more punches as the fight went on... and for him to go 12 hard rounds with Cleverly at just 3 weeks notice - shows something also.

Also shows just how hard Francis can punch at Light Heavyweight... cause his punches actually affected the Oakey engine.

People have to remember, Oakey took the Clev fight at short notice - if he had a decent training camp then it may well have been different.

Yep it's typical Warren, get a decent guy like Oakey in with his man Cleverley, but there's a hitch, oh yes, 3 weeks notice. With a full camp I think Oakey would have given Celeverly a very tough match indeed.

As fir the Prizefighter, well Oakey won me some dosh, happy with that he was the most experienced and highest level guy in there, gota feel sorry for DIlks I had him in control in that semi, very strange.