Page 2 of 2
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 10:28
by sweetscience
he should fight the Frog who beat thaxton in about May
then fight Barrera for the vacant the back end of July
two winnable fights and gives khan 6 months more training over in the states with roach
then he will be as ready as he ever will be for the big boys
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 10:48
by BABY BLUE
sweetscience wrote:he should fight the Frog who beat thaxton in about May
then fight Barrera for the vacant the back end of July
two winnable fights and gives khan 6 months more training over in the states with roach
then he will be as ready as he ever will be for the big boys
big boys like Marquez or daizs lol. nop i dont think he will .dont think he will win either of thoses fights.or guzman or peterson if he ever faces them . no chance in hell will khan win those fights. even if khan moves up a weight he will have the like of witters ,hatton ,pacman and campbell.etc...
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 10:55
by sweetscience
BABY BLUE wrote:sweetscience wrote:he should fight the Frog who beat thaxton in about May
then fight Barrera for the vacant the back end of July
two winnable fights and gives khan 6 months more training over in the states with roach
then he will be as ready as he ever will be for the big boys
big boys like Marquez or daizs lol. nop i dont think he will .dont think he will win either of thoses fights.or guzman or peterson if he ever faces them . no chance in hell will khan win those fights. even if khan moves up a weight he will have the like of witters ,hatton ,pacman and campbell.etc...
i never said he'd beat the big boys but he will have a go, and fair play to him we have fornicate all brit boxers capable of fighting them
i say get behind him, cause its the only chance in the forseeable future we have off getting some 'names' over to these shores
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 11:01
by BABY BLUE
sweetscience wrote:BABY BLUE wrote:sweetscience wrote:he should fight the Frog who beat thaxton in about May
then fight Barrera for the vacant the back end of July
two winnable fights and gives khan 6 months more training over in the states with roach
then he will be as ready as he ever will be for the big boys
big boys like Marquez or daizs lol. nop i dont think he will .dont think he will win either of thoses fights.or guzman or peterson if he ever faces them . no chance in hell will khan win those fights. even if khan moves up a weight he will have the like of witters ,hatton ,pacman and campbell.etc...
i never said he'd beat the big boys but he will have a go, and fair play to him we have eff all brit boxers capable of fighting them
i say get behind him, cause its the only chance in the forseeable future we have off getting some 'names' over to these shores
the only time i will ever get behind khan is when he fights a desent lw in the world and wins .also a world title against a decent oppnant .not a bum.
khan has still yet to prove to everyone that he is world class prospect. which he cleary is not as he has not fought anyone in the top lW in the world.
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 11:05
by alexpaterson
I think Prescott should have a rematch or fight someone like D Diaz hes not ready for JMM or J Diaz or Cambpell
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 11:07
by BABY BLUE
alexpaterson wrote:I think Prescott should have a rematch or fight someone like D Diaz hes not ready for JMM or J Diaz or Cambpell
nah no point .khan will get ko'd again . i dont think warren will allow the fight to go ahead as to what happend last time.
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 11:13
by sweetscience
BABY BLUE wrote:[
the only time i will ever get behind khan is when he fights a desent lw in the world and wins .also a world title against a decent oppnant .not a bum.
khan has still yet to prove to everyone that he is world class prospect. which he cleary is not as he has not fought anyone in the top lW in the world.
well what boxers do you get behind then ?
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 11:24
by Pill_85
I think a fight with Mezaache would be quite straight forward for kahn and would give him the euro belt however, it could lead to several hard defences against unknown quanitys. Definatly not what frank would want when he is waiting for a title to become vacant or for a poor belt holder to come along. (To be honest looking arround europe at the moment im not sure if any one will pop up there are alot of patchy records about)
As far a a belt goes has any one seen Paulus Mosses is that a possibility for kahn to pick up a title?
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 11:37
by BABY BLUE
sweetscience wrote:BABY BLUE wrote:[
the only time i will ever get behind khan is when he fights a desent lw in the world and wins .also a world title against a decent oppnant .not a bum.
khan has still yet to prove to everyone that he is world class prospect. which he cleary is not as he has not fought anyone in the top lW in the world.
well what boxers do you get behind then ?
hatton,hayes, froch .pavlik,,marquez ,diazs etc...
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 11:40
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:BABY BLUE wrote:Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Bring on Marquez, Khan might just have enough for him, rather risk it all against the LW KIng than against Guzman or Petterson who just maybe better and no big rewards for the bother. A pity Campbell isn't still champ because he was there for the taking.
well funny you should mension campbell in the mix. there were negociations between campbell taking on khan. but the fight fell threw as khan was a chicken shit.warren knew to risky fight for khan the china chin would have got exposed.
if khan ever considers getting in the ring with guzman or peterson hes in for worst night of his life. he will get Ko'd brutally even worse than marquez and the diazs.hahahaha.
Got a source for Campbell offering Khan a fight, and how many 22yos you know are stepping into world title fights before they are properly developed anyway? Not many
Campbell was never nearly as good as Barrera anyway, he got sparked by Peden who MAB shut out
BUMP
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 11:52
by Rob Magic
Whoever it is Khan fights next im looking forward to knowing who it is. As Khan fights on PPV now whats Warrens next show gonna be like now the likes of Macarrinelli & Cook got beat. Its going to have to be a credible opponent if people are going to be shelling out £15. Whats Warrens stable like now for champions anyway. I know Macklin just won the british.
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 16 Mar 2009, 06:40
by BABY BLUE
Rob Magic wrote:Whoever it is Khan fights next im looking forward to knowing who it is. As Khan fights on PPV now whats Warrens next show gonna be like now the likes of Macarrinelli & Cook got beat. Its going to have to be a credible opponent if people are going to be shelling out £15. Whats Warrens stable like now for champions anyway. I know Macklin just won the british.
i reakon warren can put khanin maybe for a euro belt .khan will have to face Diazs ,guzman etc... he can't duck them which im sure warren will try to. khan is going to get ko'd again its waiting to happen again.
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 16 Mar 2009, 08:31
by Raff The Frenchman
they will find some past prime old champ or another easy guy to feast on and claim he is awesome...
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 16 Mar 2009, 09:39
by Coffee Aroma
Ann Saccurato

Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 16 Mar 2009, 10:03
by boxing_rob
Alex Arthur seems a good bet to me, didn't Arthur say he'd been promised the winner of Khan Barrera on a Bunce Hour episode? It wouldn't surprise me if he mysteriously climbed up the rankings after his lightweight debut. Surely that must be quite soon. It all seems very unfair on Breidis Prescott but thats modern boxing politics sadly.
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 16 Mar 2009, 10:21
by BABY BLUE
Raff The Frenchman wrote:they will find some past prime old champ or another easy guy to feast on and claim he is awesome...
yeah warrens way of marketing his boxer i guess. like he did with enzo mac.i hope he leaves warren though.
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 16 Mar 2009, 10:30
by charlieb
Seems to be a lot of snide and bitter posters coming outta the woodwork after Saturday night.
Just because you'd written Khan off as driftwood, doesn't mean he has to stick to your plan.
Personally, I picked MAB to stop him, but couldn't be happier with the way Khan performed, as for a shot at the title, I'm fairly certain he'd beat Katsidis and he's got as good a chance as any against the likes of Diaz, Marquez, etc. Prescott and Guzman are the two biggest no-nos imo.
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 16 Mar 2009, 10:52
by BABY BLUE
charlieb wrote:Seems to be a lot of snide and bitter posters coming outta the woodwork after Saturday night.
Just because you'd written Khan off as driftwood, doesn't mean he has to stick to your plan.
Personally, I picked MAB to stop him, but couldn't be happier with the way Khan performed, as for a shot at the title, I'm fairly certain he'd beat Katsidis and he's got as good a chance as any against the likes of Diaz, Marquez, etc. Prescott and Guzman are the two biggest no-nos imo.
yeah same here .but mab could have ko'd amir .it pissed me off when amir was putting his gloves in the air like he owed the place. moron. im sure he would not dare do that infront of diaz or marquez or peterson.
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 16 Mar 2009, 15:52
by Rob Magic
charlieb wrote:Seems to be a lot of snide and bitter posters coming outta the woodwork after Saturday night.
Just because you'd written Khan off as driftwood, doesn't mean he has to stick to your plan.
Personally, I picked MAB to stop him, but couldn't be happier with the way Khan performed, as for a shot at the title, I'm fairly certain he'd beat Katsidis and he's got as good a chance as any against the likes of Diaz, Marquez, etc. Prescott and Guzman are the two biggest no-nos imo.
Katsidis has too good a punch for Warren to even put Khan in with. Expect Khan's next fight to be against a feather fisted blown up super-featherweight.
Re: who does khan fight for the vacant title??
Posted: 17 Mar 2009, 06:40
by BABY BLUE
Rob Magic wrote:charlieb wrote:Seems to be a lot of snide and bitter posters coming outta the woodwork after Saturday night.
Just because you'd written Khan off as driftwood, doesn't mean he has to stick to your plan.
Personally, I picked MAB to stop him, but couldn't be happier with the way Khan performed, as for a shot at the title, I'm fairly certain he'd beat Katsidis and he's got as good a chance as any against the likes of Diaz, Marquez, etc. Prescott and Guzman are the two biggest no-nos imo.
Katsidis has too good a punch for Warren to even put Khan in with. Expect Khan's next fight to be against a feather fisted blown up super-featherweight.
yeah proberly .well im sure warren will put a good fight though for khan. lets hope its not bum to ko over to look good. he can fool everyone else but cant fool me.
i hope its katsidis though. then we can see khan ko'd again.