Page 2 of 2

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 17:02
by Fatsam
Just put 20quid on Mcarthur, he's destroying saville.

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 17:04
by chris s
ghost kid wrote:King was awful
Never realised how bad he was until I looked at his record afterwards. He has been so well protected it is unreal
Fatsam wrote:Just put 20quid on Mcarthur, he's destroying saville.
Just done a tenner myself at 11/4 on him and he is cut

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 17:07
by Fatsam
It doesn't look too bad

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 18:27
by steve689
It's been a bit of a subdued affair but rather enjoyable. Not a classy lineup but well matched and some entertainment.

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 18:39
by steve689
**************SPOILER*********************















Ryan Brawley beats Stephen Burke in the final over 3x3's :box:

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 18:45
by boxerbob
brawley look a decent prospect

i think though that mcarthur looks the best of the lot there

would have loved to see a brawley vs mcarthur final

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 18:45
by Autobarn
I didn't think the format would suit Brawley. Well done to him.

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 19:26
by kevin mac
well done ryan all the gym work paid off pal,route to the british now mate :TU:

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 20:07
by sgtcecil
congratulations ryan. good to see a fellow ayrshire boy do well!

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 20:54
by Noelsy
McArthur was by far the best boxer on show bad tactics from the Burkey :verysad: Head & Heal of the Glove


Well Done Ryan all the best mate


McArthur will move on bigger and better things :box:

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 26 Mar 2009, 13:18
by napoles7
alexpaterson wrote:Hardly seen any of these lot
thats because you have hardly seen any boxer

you thought ricky hatton was a heavyweight

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 26 Mar 2009, 13:20
by rhino222
napoles7 wrote:
alexpaterson wrote:Hardly seen any of these lot
thats because you have hardly seen any boxer

you thought ricky hatton was a heavyweight
for 80% of the year...he is !!! :TU:

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 26 Mar 2009, 13:26
by alexpaterson
napoles7 wrote:
alexpaterson wrote:Hardly seen any of these lot
thats because you have hardly seen any boxer

you thought ricky hatton was a heavyweight
Ye wen i was about 5 and never seen a boxing match in my life

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 26 Mar 2009, 13:27
by napoles7
alexpaterson wrote:
napoles7 wrote:
alexpaterson wrote:Hardly seen any of these lot
thats because you have hardly seen any boxer

you thought ricky hatton was a heavyweight
Ye wen i was about 5 and never seen a boxing match in my life
no it was last year

you know nothing

Re: Prizefighter Lightweights

Posted: 26 Mar 2009, 13:55
by sgtcecil
looking at the boxrec rankings for lightweight there. why is burke above brawley now? brawley was above him before prizefighter and defeated burke in the final. so why would this result in burke going above brawley in the computerised rankings?