Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 16:36
Why is Matthew Hatton a fool?NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Bami Bami Bu-ma-yay!!!!
Bu-ma-yay Ted Bami!!!!!!!
Come on Ted lad get that belt and shut that fool up!
BoxRec
Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami(Spoilers)
Page 2 of 3
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 16:47
He comes out with wild statements and reckons to want to fight every decent fighter under the sun. He never does though. I find it a stark contrast from lads who just get on with it and avoid nobody. The hard way. The proper way. That's the vibe I get.
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 16:57
I'm a little baffled, what fighters has he been bad mouthing and slagging off?NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:He comes out with wild statements and reckons to want to fight every decent fighter under the sun. He never does though. I find it a stark contrast from lads who just get on with it and avoid nobody. The hard way. The proper way. That's the vibe I get.
What I see is a fighter who has taken some good pay days on his brothers undercards which have far surpassed a British level payout, he has now got the chance to top a bill against Bami with the chance to fight for a title on the Ricky-Pacquiao undercard
If that makes him a fool god only knows what your are!
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:02
Scott Quigg and Prince Arron both won by knockouts I think? Wss only half watching. Joe Murray on now.
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:05
Kevin Anderson and Ali Nuumbembe for 2. He also said he's good enough to one day be a genuine World Champ. By which I don't mean the IBO.Hagler2002 wrote:I'm a little baffled, what fighters has he been bad mouthing and slagging off?NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:He comes out with wild statements and reckons to want to fight every decent fighter under the sun. He never does though. I find it a stark contrast from lads who just get on with it and avoid nobody. The hard way. The proper way. That's the vibe I get.
What I see is a fighter who has taken some good pay days on his brothers undercards which have far surpassed a British level payout, he has now got the chance to top a bill against Bami with the chance to fight for a title on the Ricky-Pacquiao undercard
If that makes him a fool god only knows what your are!
You do come across as a baffled sort of a person actually Hagler. Someone said it the other day, he's chosen to avoid making a proper reputation by beating the domestic opposition and instead boxed in front of 200 people in practically empty halls in America while folks was at the bar having a drink. Folks from his home town I might add, 3000 miles from home, who would rather stand and sup beer than watch him.
I don't doubt he got paid more money for them. Depends whether your preferred currency is respect or cash.
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:12
Come on Ted. Win it for the Londoners.
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:13
I come across as baffledNorthEastBoxingFan wrote:You do come across as a baffled sort of a person actually Hagler.Hagler2002 wrote:I'm a little baffled, what fighters has he been bad mouthing and slagging off?NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:He comes out with wild statements and reckons to want to fight every decent fighter under the sun. He never does though. I find it a stark contrast from lads who just get on with it and avoid nobody. The hard way. The proper way. That's the vibe I get.
What I see is a fighter who has taken some good pay days on his brothers undercards which have far surpassed a British level payout, he has now got the chance to top a bill against Bami with the chance to fight for a title on the Ricky-Pacquiao undercard
If that makes him a fool god only knows what your are!
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Well if you look at their respective clashes against Johanneson, Burns was floored 3 times. To my memory Gomez wasn't down was he? I realise he got stopped, and I think Burns made it to the (final) bell.
As regards Gomez' ability to do 12 Hagler, I think you may be surprised, he was doing okay against Johanneson, in that fight he expended a hell of a lot of energy, which to me, suggests if he paced himself there's enough there to do 12. Plus he's a natural fighter so I don't think he'll waste a lot of "nervous" energy, too seasoned in my book.
Burns, who I didn't necessarily mean to paint as powerless, should be quick enough and young enough to avoid Gomez' danger shots and get a points win.
GobshiteNorthEastBoxingFan wrote: did anybody else not think when this fight was made Gomez would be up against a huge obstacle? He looked worn against Johanneson, which isn't to say he didn't fight well that night, but you judge somebody's decline by how good they were and how good they are , don't you?
I just thought it was last chance saloon versus Johanneson, last chance saloon versus Khan...and Burns is so much fitter in 2009 than Gomez. How many times are you meant to go to that fckin Saloon? That's my take on it anyway.
By any chance are you from Cleveland?
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:17
I said Gomez would be up against it but I thought he may do twelve. As it turns out sounds like he had less left thean he did when he boxed Johanneson.
What about the "licking of his life" Dunne took last week eh?
Wanker.
What about the "licking of his life" Dunne took last week eh?
Wanker.
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:18
Pretty tough late sub for a pro debut - Razak's record may not be upto much but he's a lightweight, went 10rnds in his last fight and has only been stopped twice in 27 fights. Still I don't like the way Murray drops his hands - he's copped quite a few clean ones.steve689 wrote:Scott Quigg and Prince Arron both won by knockouts I think? Wss only half watching. Joe Murray on now.
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami(Spoilers)
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:21
You're right. Sid Razak is no mug and over 6x3's as well.
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:23
Hurling insults shows your lack of intelligence, if I got everyone right I would be a millionaire, why don't you go back a bit further and trawl up my tip for a Pacquiao KO against DLH @ 10/1 or Prescott to KO KhanNorthEastBoxingFan wrote:I said Gomez would be up against it but I thought he may do twelve. As it turns out sounds like he had less left thean he did when he boxed Johanneson.
What about the "licking of his life" Dunne took last week eh?
Wanker.
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami(Spoilers)
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:27
So I'm a wanker & Matthew Hatton is a fool, you must have a high opinion of yourself 
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:32
Don't you class Gobshite as hurling an insult?Hagler2002 wrote:Hurling insults shows your lack of intelligence, if I got everyone right I would be a millionaire, why don't you go back a bit further and trawl up my tip for a Pacquiao KO against DLH @ 10/1 or Prescott to KO KhanNorthEastBoxingFan wrote:I said Gomez would be up against it but I thought he may do twelve. As it turns out sounds like he had less left thean he did when he boxed Johanneson.
What about the "licking of his life" Dunne took last week eh?
Wanker.
And you picked Pacquiao to KO De La Hoya? Well congratulations. Personally I didn't think it was ever in doubt.
You've contradicted yourself several times in a row now and then tried to prove your "intelligence" by bragging that you correctly picked what I perceived to be a pretty obvious win for Pac.
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami(Spoilers)
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:33
And I'm not even interested in whatever pseudo-shit that is meant to mean. Go on lad...........Hagler2002 wrote:So I'm a wanker & Matthew Hatton is a fool, you must have a high opinion of yourself
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami(Spoilers)
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:35
its not really rocket science is itNorthEastBoxingFan wrote:And I'm not even interested in whatever pseudo-shit that is meant to mean. Go on lad...........Hagler2002 wrote:So I'm a wanker & Matthew Hatton is a fool, you must have a high opinion of yourself
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami(Spoilers)
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:36
Come on now girls
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami(Spoilers)
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:37
Where have I "contradicted" myself?
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami(Spoilers)
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:38
Bami-Hatton are in the ring round 1....come on DANGEROUS!
ps.
Chill out lads (Hagler & NEBF) this ain't the current scene! 
ps.
Chill out lads (Hagler & NEBF) this ain't the current scene!
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:40
.
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami(Spoilers)
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:41
Hatton looks much bigger
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:47
Hagler2002 wrote:NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
What about the "licking of his life" Dunne took last week eh?
Wanker.
Why don't you pop down to Tams Tyres on Byker bridge tomorrow and I can guarantee you will get the licking of your life!
how you going to gaurantee that then lad? If I wanted to meet you pal I'm more of a now man. Not when you can be bothered down at "Tams Tyres".
Now savour this message lad cos it's the last, I wouldn't ever say I found you interesting, despite the "intelligence" you're so pleased to point out you have, but now I'm finding you a bore
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:52
Come on!!Hagler2002 wrote:NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
What about the "licking of his life" Dunne took last week eh?
Wanker.
Why don't you pop down to Tams Tyres on Byker bridge tomorrow and I can guarantee you will get the licking of your life!
Keep your sexual preferences to yourself!!!
This is a boxing forum!!!
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami(Spoilers)
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:53
Yeah and Bami is looking sluggish or maybe Hatton is making him look that way - he's looking sharp I have to say. Boxing well.Coco wrote:Hatton looks much bigger
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami(Spoilers)
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:54
Hatton has won the first four for me, just too busy, Bami is still in first gear, he doesn't seem that up for it
Re: Matthew Hatton vs Ted Bami
Posted: 28 Mar 2009, 17:56
Thought so, full of wind and piss....NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
What about the "licking of his life" Dunne took last week eh?
Wanker.
Why don't you pop down to Tams Tyres on Byker bridge tomorrow and I can guarantee you will get the licking of your life!
how you going to gaurantee that then lad? If I wanted to meet you pal I'm more of a now man. Not when you can be bothered down at "Tams Tyres".
Now savour this message lad cos it's the last, I wouldn't ever say I found you interesting, despite the "intelligence" you're so pleased to point out you have, but now I'm finding you a bore