Page 2 of 2
Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 22 Apr 2009, 12:22
by twenty six
See the post under Small v Hall.
On a different subject, whilst the purse is attractive for Appleby, 72k is wide of the mark.
Steve - I'll be there mate.
Counter - thanks for the comments mate.
I do have to work for a living and do not have to hang on to every whisper of dogbreath.

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 22 Apr 2009, 15:22
by Counter-puncher
steve689 wrote:Brave call Bennie. I'm slightly swinging towards Appleby but it's a real 50/50 affair.
Come on then - who's going??

home advantage tipping it, that's what started to make me lean towards lindsay too
Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 22 Apr 2009, 16:09
by beagleboy
Counter-puncher wrote:beagleboy wrote:I've never known her so quiet.
Maybe she's caught a cold.
![[icon_e_geek.gif] :geek:](./images/smilies/icon_e_geek.gif)
here's a thought mate: maybe he's got other things to do than going on the internet to 'banter' with the likes of you?
I mean, maybe, just maybe, at every single piece of boxing news related to Ryan Rhodes, he actually doesn't immediately think 'Christ i'd better get on boxrec and defend Ryan, otherwise heaven help him, for surely that beagleboy will run amok with Ryan's reputation in my critical absence'
just a thought for you to ponder.
She was just too quiet after that mysterious pull-out, it was obvious something was going on you self-righteous fool.
![[icon_e_geek.gif] :geek:](./images/smilies/icon_e_geek.gif)
Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 22 Apr 2009, 16:16
by beagleboy
Gazmac81 wrote:Is Rhodes And Small still on for a later Date
Something isnt right here
Counter-puncher wrote:beagleboy wrote:I've never known her so quiet.
Maybe she's caught a cold.
![[icon_e_geek.gif] :geek:](./images/smilies/icon_e_geek.gif)
here's a thought mate: maybe he's got other things to do than going on the internet to 'banter' with the likes of you?
I mean, maybe, just maybe, at every single piece of boxing news related to Ryan Rhodes, he actually doesn't immediately think 'Christ i'd better get on boxrec and defend Ryan, otherwise heaven help him, for surely that beagleboy will run amok with Ryan's reputation in my critical absence'
just a thought for you to ponder.
Gazmac could see it

Stevie Wonder could see it
Looked like somebody missed those counter-punching openings
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 07:51
by beagleboy
Rhodes is now lined up to box a Hungarian who got KOd by Colin Lynes.
![[icon_e_geek.gif] :geek:](./images/smilies/icon_e_geek.gif)
Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 08:28
by sweetscience
why are they paying Appleby £72k, thats just madness
this show is obviously going to run at a loss, surely ??
Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 12:10
by steve689
Preview up soon on BBN.
Rhodes is in with Janos Petrovics.
Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 12:29
by whatashambles
Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 23 Apr 2009, 15:28
by Counter-puncher
beagleboy wrote:Counter-puncher wrote:beagleboy wrote:I've never known her so quiet.
Maybe she's caught a cold.
![[icon_e_geek.gif] :geek:](./images/smilies/icon_e_geek.gif)
here's a thought mate: maybe he's got other things to do than going on the internet to 'banter' with the likes of you?
I mean, maybe, just maybe, at every single piece of boxing news related to Ryan Rhodes, he actually doesn't immediately think 'Christ i'd better get on boxrec and defend Ryan, otherwise heaven help him, for surely that beagleboy will run amok with Ryan's reputation in my critical absence'
just a thought for you to ponder.
She was just too quiet after that mysterious pull-out, it was obvious something was going on you self-righteous fool.
![[icon_e_geek.gif] :geek:](./images/smilies/icon_e_geek.gif)
my comment was nowt to do with whether or not something 'fishy' was going on with Rhodes-Small, i have no vested interest one way or another in that, as you seem to do.
it was to do with the fact that your snidey stalking following of 26 makes you look like a pathetic little kid, and the fact that you mistakenly seem to think your comments must always merit a reply from 26, and if he's not replying, well he must be running and hiding from your sad insinuations.
I was saying the fact he hasn't replied, maybe that means he has
a life. get one yourself.
Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 03:40
by twenty six
I feel like I'm being stalked mate.
Which pervert would want to stalk an over 50 has been ?
He's got an agenda - simple as.
Sad thing is you know, I reckon he knows his stuff on boxing generally

- just wish he'd post on another theme every now and then.
Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 11:17
by steve689
http://www.britishboxing.net/news_4540- ... ndsay.html
Cracking football style atmosphere at the weigh-in just now. I didn't get any video footage but had the trusty dictaphone with me so should put up a bit of audio later if I remember.

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 11:18
by Ted
Should you not have used you finger its more hygienic.

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 11:25
by steve689
eh?
Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard
Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 11:29
by Ted
steve689 wrote:eh?
dict -ta - phone....
y'know
dick to phone?
You can tell its a friday afternoon