BoxRec

Dioufy wrote: Hatton KO11 after Manny can't handle his body attacks.

mate against the odds and supposedly against rational thinking etc etc this is the way i am leaning in my gut only earlier than 11rds. goddam, shot or not, Castillo was a big tough mofo and if Hatton can stop him with one livershot..... (awaits the obvious responses about Pac, unlike JLC, not being a stauesque ideal target)

hatton wants to be careful with the left downstairs anyway. from memory, when Magee knocked him down, it was when hatton was trying to double up with the hook and he shipped the counter right hook from magge while he was throwing the second left. pac's right hook is greatly improve especially as a counter

You seen that clip of Manny being decked by a jab? Weight-drained or not, that's got to be a worry for him. Hatton will land at some point.

Dioufy wrote:You seen that clip of Manny being decked by a jab? Weight-drained or not, that's got to be a worry for him. Hatton will land at some point.

No-one else has done it. It was a one off.

Still not the point - it happened, and there's always a big chance of it happening again.

Nah, extremely small chance of it happening again. Pacquiao is much less vulnerable now that he isn't draining so much.

Dioufy wrote:Still not the point - it happened, and there's always a big chance of it happening again.

I guess just like its a chance Hatton will get stopped

There is a chance of that - I don't recall ever disputing that. And sorry, if you get put down by a jab (and it didn't even look like it was a balance thing) then you have to be careful. Weight-draining isn't an issue for me when that happens.

Dioufy wrote:There is a chance of that - I don't recall ever disputing that. And sorry, if you get put down by a jab (and it didn't even look like it was a balance thing) then you have to be careful. Weight-draining isn't an issue for me when that happens.

I don't think Hatton is very good jabber, you pointing out flaws on Pac,but Hatton was hurt by Lazcano and hasn't been in with
a come forward fighter since Urango and and a boxer-puncher since Floyd.

Firstly, I don't think Hatton was hurt by Lazcano. He got hit and pushed back twice, but almost immediately he went back to work on Lazcano. If you're going to call that as "being hurt" then I think most boxers 'get hurt' in 95% of their fights.

Don't get me wrong. Hatton will struggle - he's going in against everything he doesn't like. A fast, south-paw, with power. If Hatton is to win then he has to show a strong chin, which we know he has and lots of guts, which goes with out saying.

And more importantly, a lot of luck.

Dioufy wrote:Firstly, I don't think Hatton was hurt by Lazcano. He got hit and pushed back twice, but almost immediately he went back to work on Lazcano. If you're going to call that as "being hurt" then I think most boxers 'get hurt' in 95% of their fights.

Don't get me wrong. Hatton will struggle - he's going in against everything he doesn't like. A fast, south-paw, with power. If Hatton is to win then he has to show a strong chin, which we know he has and lots of guts, which goes with out saying.

And more importantly, a lot of luck.

SO your picking Hatton on luck?

No, I just believe he has the tools to win, and to win anything in sport, you need a bit of luck.

If Pacquiao had fought against top level fighters at 140lbs, and won, then I would pick him.

Plus, I am English.

Dioufy wrote:No, I just believe he has the tools to win, and to win anything in sport, you need a bit of luck.

If Pacquiao had fought against top level fighters at 140lbs, and won, then I would pick him.

Plus, I am English.

I knew it was bias I just wanted to make sure

Dioufy wrote: Don't get me wrong. Hatton will struggle - he's going in against everything he doesn't like. A fast, south-paw, with power. If Hatton is to win then he has to show a strong chin, which we know he has and lots of guts, which goes with out saying.

And more importantly, a lot of luck.

Luck & Heart and a good chin doesn't give you the tools to beat an elite fighters. What offense is Luck, Heart and chin?
I guess Froch beats Taylor with those skills. I believe Hatton and Froch can wn, but just saying they have heart and chins
aren't enough to beat elite fighters

God, you are silly. Those are just SOME of his attributes.

And luck is neither here nor there.

Dioufy wrote:God, you are silly. Those are just SOME of his attributes.

And luck is neither here nor there.

You seem like a good dude, so don't take this the wrong way I thought picking
a winner for fight seem to have some thought other than his countryman bias for
Hatton, Froch and Haye and no questions these guys can win, but to just hope
Hatton gets lucky or Haye hits Klitschko first or Froch has a good chin and heart
are they need to win with no plan i.e. (body Hatton, movement and jabs then getting
inside and landed with fast combinations , Haye or Froch going to the body to negate
Taylor's movement and then getting inside and land the uppercut.)

I guess I expect more insight other than they have heart and chin and there from England

Fair enough, mate. I will give you my specific reasons why I think Hatton will win.

He's the bigger man. Apart from beat a dead de la Hoya, Pacquiao hasn't fought above 135lbs. Even then, he's only fought the limited Diaz (looked sexy doing it mind). For me, that's a lack of experience against the big boys. Also, we've seen Pacman KO'ed twice to the body in his career - body-shots happen to be Hatton's forte. And you said Hatton had no jab - that's funny, I seemed to see it land on Malignaggi's face plenty enough. Furthermore, if Hatton can drag this fight into the latter rounds then that's where I think he can land a body-shot on the fatigued Pacquiao. Remember too, if Hatton cuts Pacquiao, that could push the fight into Hatton's favour - was it the Marquez fight where that half-serious cut really got to Manny? I think it was.

Hatton might get cut, but that's now really a non-entity unless the cut's that severe for the fight to be stopped. He seems to manage okay with cuts, so even if we see Hatton cut, then I don't think it will be too bad unless it's a fight-stopping wound.



Real 50/50 fight in my view, but I am siding with Hatton.

Funny how this discussion has turned from Khan vs Kotelnik to Pac vs Hatton :) I personally am not fan of Hatton's at all in the ring but credit is due to him making the most anticipated and exciting fights from time to time! Kosta, FMJ and now Pacman are superb fights to make.

For me if they were naturally the same weight Pacman would beat Hatton everytime. He is too fast, powerful and accurate. Hatton, ever since Kosta has blown hot and cold and looked a bit worn at times. I have posted on other forums months ago that I thought the Kosta fight and certainly the FMJ ko had had a big effect on Hatton and he was on the slide. He did look a lot better against Malignaggi but he was fighting someone with zero power and he still got caught a lot. His vunerability is why I think Pacman will win this time also as Pacman will make him move too much and catch him too many times. If Pac is carrying his power up fine which I think he is then Hatton won't be able to cope for 12 rounds as I don't think he has another 'Kosta' war left in him. As someone else said Hatton's best hope lies in his body shots but Roach is a master at tactics and I they will have a better gameplan to frustrate Hatton much like FMJ did.

Since Witter inspired this discussion, I just would like to add Hatton should have fought witter. As much as Hatton has got great fights I really wish fighters would do things the right way like Haye did at cruiser etc. Get European, then world, then unify. Hatton has got belts to then vacate, move up, back down too much. Too many fighters are getting, or having to do this these days and I hope for boxings sake someone sorts it out and puts some kind of respected structure in place. No other major sport operates in such a bizarre and often self destructive way!

Oh, and I think Kotelnik will most likely beat Khan. He pushed Witter close and I think Witter would destroy Khan. Khan pitter patters too much, lacks consistent accuracy and has no chin. The later will always be his downfall.

Dioufy wrote:Firstly, I don't think Hatton was hurt by Lazcano. He got hit and pushed back twice, but almost immediately he went back to work on Lazcano. If you're going to call that as "being hurt" then I think most boxers 'get hurt' in 95% of their fights.

Don't get me wrong. Hatton will struggle - he's going in against everything he doesn't like. A fast, south-paw, with power. If Hatton is to win then he has to show a strong chin, which we know he has and lots of guts, which goes with out saying.

And more importantly, a lot of luck.

he was buzzed up i think is the right word.

agreed that lazcano got serious shite back for buzzing him.

especially in rd 8, great fightback.

nice buy for time with the shoelace trick though.