Page 11 of 11
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 27 Oct 2013, 14:18
by JCS
My report:
Code: Select all
# Winner Deductions Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Murat [* ]
2 Murat [ ]
3 Murat [ ]
4 Hopkins [** ]
5 Hopkins [* ]
6 Hopkins [ ]
7 Hopkins [** ] MPD-Murat
8 Hopkins [** ]
9 Hopkins [ ]
10 Hopkins [* ]
11 Hopkins [* ]
12 Hopkins [** ]
1 Final Scorecard
Hopkins 117-110
2 Widest Range of Scores (Giving each fighter all [ ] rounds)
Hopkins 119-108 to Hopkins 115-112
Midpoint: Hopkins 117-110
3 Widest Range of Scores (Giving each fighter all [ ] and [* ] rounds)
Hopkins 120-107 to Murat 115-112
Midpoint: Hopkins 116-111
4 Total Star Count (minus pt deductions) (Who "felt" like the winner)
Hopkins 12 | Murat 0
Hopkins wins 4 of 4 metrics above.
Final Thoughts: Hopkins 116-111 or 117-110 seem to be the sweet spot. Only the outer edge of the broadest metric supports a possible Murat scorecard. Only a blind, biased, corrupt individual could've possibly scored this for Murat.
Confidence Scale
------------------
[***] - Impossible to score it differently. Usually the loser gets hurt or does absolutely nothing.
[** ] - Definite reach to score differently.
[* ] - Arguable, but a likely score.
[ ] - Could've went to either fighter or scored even.
MPD = Mandatory point deductions (knockdown, penalty).
NMPD = Non-mandatory point deductions.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 27 Oct 2013, 19:38
by Blodhemn
Indeed. They couldn't put out a bad album if they tried.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 27 Oct 2013, 23:39
by diddy
Blodhemn wrote:Indeed. They couldn't put out a bad album if they tried.
Yes, they could. And did.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 27 Oct 2013, 23:46
by Blodhemn
The day I take your opinion on music seriously is the day I stop being a citizen of Earth. Even your taste in boxers is grotesque. You like Hopkins and Ward over someone like Kovalev. Horrible, and worthless taste.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 28 Oct 2013, 04:21
by diddy
Blodhemn wrote:The day I take your opinion on music seriously is the day I stop being a citizen of Earth. Even your taste in boxers is grotesque. You like Hopkins and Ward over someone like Kovalev. Horrible, and worthless taste.
Unlike you, I dont lie on the internet. About anything. Especially to faceless internet caricatures such as yourself. You talk about "taste" and you listen to that garbage music linked below, as if my opinion of you couldnt get any lower, jesus christ, one day perhaps you'll grow up and become an adult. May as well listen to crap like Lil Wayne and 2Chainz while you're at it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2ejpDKesX0
Awful!
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 28 Oct 2013, 04:26
by diddy
sockdolager wrote:JCS wrote:The Corona ring girl A-team can hang with any chicks out there, period.

The Corona and Tecate girls are often more interesting than most fights with their puffed up lips, tits and butts. Top notch.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 28 Oct 2013, 17:08
by Blodhemn
diddy wrote:Blodhemn wrote:The day I take your opinion on music seriously is the day I stop being a citizen of Earth. Even your taste in boxers is grotesque. You like Hopkins and Ward over someone like Kovalev. Horrible, and worthless taste.
Unlike you, I dont lie on the internet. About anything. Especially to faceless internet caricatures such as yourself. You talk about "taste" and you listen to that garbage music linked below, as if my opinion of you couldnt get any lower, jesus christ, one day perhaps you'll grow up and become an adult. May as well listen to crap like Lil Wayne and 2Chainz while you're at it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2ejpDKesX0
Awful!
You're just too easy to fool, and usually since you're on the losing end of an argument you think you've finally stumbled onto something.
Pick up a guitar and try to replicate what they do, wait no, don't because I know you can't. Learn a bit about music theory, chord progressions, song structure, wait, you can't - picking out winners in boxing is a task too difficult for you.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 28 Oct 2013, 19:35
by JCS
Blodhemn wrote:
Pick up a guitar and try to replicate what they do, wait no, don't because I know you can't. Learn a bit about music theory, chord progressions, song structure, wait, you can't - picking out winners in boxing is a task too difficult for you.
Gotta agree with diddy this time..
It's not really about musical skill appreciation though. We're not a bunch of PhD's from Juilliard judging guitar ability. It's about knowing what sounds good and knowing what sounds like sh1t. My ears tell me the latter... like I said, as if someone took The Ultimate Warrior's WWF theme song, puked on the track and chanted to Satan over top of it.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 28 Oct 2013, 19:56
by Blodhemn
Yeah and there's 2 other people in this thread who agrees with me. So who's right? No one. Enslaved is what I listen to when I want to hear interesting chord progressions with a rhythmic, almost percussive rhythm section and melodic leads. You don't need a PhD, just a general interest in song structure. If I want to hear something catchier, slower, faster, I'll listen to something else.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 29 Oct 2013, 08:44
by JCS
SouthpawStephen wrote:
This thread took a turn.
Discussions about music can be retarded. If you like it, it's good. Who's to say what sucks and what doesn't?
It's all about chord progressions and melodic leads, fool.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 29 Oct 2013, 18:39
by Blodhemn
SouthpawStephen wrote:
This thread took a turn.
Discussions about music can be retarded. If you like it, it's good. Who's to say what sucks and what doesn't?
Yeah, that's why I try not to discuss anything on here except boxing, but was asked.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 29 Oct 2013, 22:10
by Bobbyptsd
Blodhemn wrote:SouthpawStephen wrote:
This thread took a turn.
Discussions about music can be retarded. If you like it, it's good. Who's to say what sucks and what doesn't?
Yeah,
that's why I try not to discuss anything on here except boxing, but was asked.
You aren't very good at it, for someone who's trying. You spend about 90% of your time in childish arguments, from what I can tell.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 29 Oct 2013, 22:50
by Blodhemn
Bobbyptsd wrote:Blodhemn wrote:SouthpawStephen wrote:
This thread took a turn.
Discussions about music can be retarded. If you like it, it's good. Who's to say what sucks and what doesn't?
Yeah,
that's why I try not to discuss anything on here except boxing, but was asked.
You aren't very good at it, for someone who's trying. You spend about 90% of your time in childish arguments, from what I can tell.
Probably because people like you and diddy try to take jabs as best as you can, because neither of you can really hang with me in boxing discussion.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 01 Nov 2013, 20:00
by Blodhemn
Offensive art > defensive art. Also it's harder coming forward, making the fight and avoid getting hit than it is the other way around. Got to respect offensive art specialists that much more.
Re: Hopkins vs Murat
Posted: 01 Nov 2013, 23:28
by Blodhemn
Offensive talent? That's like saying Kovalev is a defensive talent. Of course to be at the pinnacle of the sport, even someone like Kovalev has a level of defense and Mayweather has a level of offense, but neither guy could fight like the other and be as successful. They're both artists. I prefer offensive artists. I don't care what anyone prefers unless you're going to be a dick about it.