BoxRec

Horse wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:If you can't work that out for yourself, you ain't worth talking to.

So PPVs never lose money?

Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

jameswilson wrote:Does the cameraman really need to close up on Carl in his pants while they are talking to McCracken.

He needs some false tan on them legs.

SouthpawStephen wrote:How does Quigg do against guys like Rigo and Santa Cruz?

Santa Cruz is his best chance as Rigo a bridge to far though

keithmoonhangover wrote:Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

I reckon the buy rate was low.

The hype for the PPV was lackluster to say the least.

'Talking 'bout my generation."

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Ketchel wrote:But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.

I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.

Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Ketchel wrote:But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.

I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.

Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.

Horse wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

I reckon the buy rate was low.

The hype for the PPV was lackluster to say the least.

I give in mate. You just crack on.

Horse wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:Stop trolling. If Fury was injured, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

I reckon the buy rate was low.

The hype for the PPV was lackluster to say the least.

I give in mate. You just crack on.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

jameswilson wrote:Does the cameraman really need to close up on Carl in his pants while they are talking to McCracken.

He needs some false tan on them legs.

You surprised? He hardly looks like Holly Hagan in the face does he?

How long to go till the main event boys ? I'm out and about & the Internet coverage sucks

I think we've just seen someone interviewed whose closely connected with Bolivia.....

jameswilson wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

jameswilson wrote:Does the cameraman really need to close up on Carl in his pants while they are talking to McCracken.

He needs some false tan on them legs.

You surprised? He hardly looks like Holly Hagan in the face does he?

I know mate. Mrs Hangover was complaining about them as well.

Horse wrote:

taffytoon wrote:yes you do

Desperate stuff.

A bit like your Monthly pound for pound British thread

Ketchel wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Ketchel wrote:But Keith this is pay per view. Nothing so far tonight justifies PPV. No more than standard fair that Sky used to serve up with Warren. This is poor even by Matchroom standards.

I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.

Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.

Which PPV cards are you talking about? Don't think I knew about these cards that had 8 World title unifications on them between 2 of the top 3 fighters in the division.

Or are you just exaggerating...

jameswilson wrote:

Ketchel wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
I agree 100% mate. Undercard is sh1te, but I paid for the main event. I'd rather I didn't have to, but I think it's worth it.

Keith I remember the early days of PPV and they were special nights. Stacked cards from UK then over to the States for another stacked card. Those days were like 8 Froch v Kessler fights on one night! Not this crap. My God, even Don King would put this card on for free its that shite.

Which PPV cards are you talking about? Don't think I knew about these cards that had 8 World title unifications on them between 2 of the top 3 fighters in the division.

Or are you just exaggerating...

Froch-Kessler wasn't a unification fight.

Haye talking sense. Groves shouldn't have wound him up. I've said it before, Groves is open to the uppercut - he stands with his head to far forward.

Naz is a legend. Met him twice. Top man.

keithmoonhangover wrote:Haye talking sense. Groves shouldn't have wound him up. I've said it before, Groves is open to the uppercut - he stands with his head to far forward.

Froch makes the same mistake when throwing punches though and Groves is faster and I'd say he has the bigger one punch power.

Naz.......even his hands are fat!!!!!!

keithmoonhangover wrote:Naz is a legend. Met him twice. Top man.

Can tell he hasn't changed from the way he's talking, was never an act with him.

How big is Hamed going to get?

SouthpawStephen wrote:I always like seeing an undefeated fighter to lose because I feel it brings out some truth. What happened when Naz lost?

He got fat

keithmoonhangover wrote:Haye talking sense. Groves shouldn't have wound him up. I've said it before, Groves is open to the uppercut - he stands with his head to far forward.

I'm looking forward to this fight, they keep saying that it's Groves talk that has built the fight up but I fancied it because I watched Groves beat Alcoba and thought he was a star in the making.

SouthpawStephen wrote:

expe wrote:

SouthpawStephen wrote:I always like seeing an undefeated fighter to lose because I feel it brings out some truth. What happened when Naz lost?

He got fat

And quit after his first loss. The way he's talking, he should still be fighting.

At heavyweight