BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by lefty »

Yeah agree with everyone's sentiments. Kovalev boxed a really measured performance tonight.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by crusader »

I liked the way he feinted to draw Hopkins in, then stepped back and timed the right hand for the KD in round one.
Boxing Writer
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1347
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by Boxing Writer »

crusader wrote:I'm not usually one to be wise after the fact, but people really thought Krusher had no skills? That he was just a bigger lumberer like Pavlik?
Of course not. Kovalev has good skills, good patience, good stamina and incredible workrate besides power. But it have to be said that Bernard Hopkins is far, far away from the fighter he was 6 years ago, so Pavlik comparison doesn't work not only because Kovalev is different from Pavlik, but also because Hopkins of 2008 is different fighter from Hopkins of 2014.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by crusader »

I wasn't talking about how Hopkins matched up with Kovalev and Pavlik. I was addressing the fairly common sentiment that Kovalev was just a bigger Pavlik who had power but little else.
Ian1973
Middleweight
Posts: 1447
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 14:58

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by Ian1973 »

Kovalev is better than Pavlik ever was.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by lefty »

Pavlik didnt have the intelligence that Kovalev possesses when he wants to show it. Pavlik just followed Hopkins around the ring like a clueless buffoon.
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by observer1 »

crusader wrote:I'm not usually one to be wise after the fact, but people really thought Krusher had no skills? That he was just a bigger lumberer like Pavlik?
Pavlik and Kovalev actually fight remarkably similar....

Kovalev is obviously just much bigger/broader.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by ikorolev »

fergusg wrote:Krusher showed patience, stamina and discipline, because he executed his gameplan to perfection, but Hopkins wasn't throwing punches... so there are still some unanswered questions, as he hasn't been pushed yet.

Kovalev is a very good fighter and appears to be the number one at 175lbs, but who can he fight next, without having to "cross the street" to Showtime?
Ward is definitely not stepping up after watching today's fight even though Kovalev vs Ward could be a PPV now.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by crusader »

fergusg wrote:
crusader wrote:I'm not usually one to be wise after the fact, but people really thought Krusher had no skills? That he was just a bigger lumberer like Pavlik?
Who said Kovalev had no skills?
I've seen it plenty on various forums, especially BS.

Here are some quote exemplifying the general idea:
Kovalev, while he has thunderous power that is usually enough to get his (mostly weak) opponents out early, is a terrible boxer
Kovalev sucks. He has power, but his footwork and balance are atrocious, he's slow, he holds his hands way too loose and his head movement is mediocre making him an easy target, and it is easy to lull him to sleep. People talk about his work rate, but he is only busy when he hurts you, and I don't think he is a good enough boxer to be able to set Hopkins up for too many power shots. I see Hopkins keeping the pace slow and frustrating him with pot shots and movement, just as he always does, and then catching him with hard shots when Kovalev squares up and gets off balance, which he seems to do about 5-10 times each round.
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by Freedom2013 »

Props to Bernard Hopkins for being a good sport after the fight.
klitoris
Super Welterweight
Posts: 927
Joined: 29 Sep 2014, 18:16

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by klitoris »

The only fight I can see after this for BHop would be a third with Pascal.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by stevedoc »

Freedom2013 wrote:Props to Bernard Hopkins for being a good sport after the fight.
:TU: not the normal i was cheated
Ian1973
Middleweight
Posts: 1447
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 14:58

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by Ian1973 »

fergusg wrote:
Ian1973 wrote:Kovalev is better than Pavlik ever was.
Why mention an alcoholic middleweight like Pavlik? Why mention Pavlik's name when Kovalev is being discussed?

You're right. Me = shhhhhh!! :TU:
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by lefty »

observer1 wrote:
crusader wrote:I'm not usually one to be wise after the fact, but people really thought Krusher had no skills? That he was just a bigger lumberer like Pavlik?
Pavlik and Kovalev actually fight remarkably similar....

Kovalev is obviously just much bigger/broader.
I wouldnt say they're the same. They're both come forward fighters but Kovalev doesnt over commit himself like Pavlik and leave himself open to counters to the same degree. They're both pressure fighters but Kovalev is more intelligent with it and can counter punch aswell. Pavlik couldnt really counter punch.
Boxing Writer
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1347
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by Boxing Writer »

Kovalev vs Beterbiev will be a HUGE fight two years from now, considering their styles and bad blood between them from the amateurs days.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by crusader »

observer1 wrote:
crusader wrote:I'm not usually one to be wise after the fact, but people really thought Krusher had no skills? That he was just a bigger lumberer like Pavlik?
Pavlik and Kovalev actually fight remarkably similar....

Kovalev is obviously just much bigger/broader.
I think Kov is more accurate, fights more intelligently, has faster hands for the weight, better timing, and has displayed significantly more ability to punch while being attacked or pushed back. There are some similarities, such as good power for their weights and their right hands probably being their best shots.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by lefty »

Boxing Writer wrote:Kovalev vs Beterbiev will be a HUGE fight two years from now, considering their styles and bad blood between them from the amateurs days.
Was there bad blood between them in the amateurs then? Ps i can see that fight happening a lot sooner than 2 years time if it happens.
Ian1973
Middleweight
Posts: 1447
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 14:58

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by Ian1973 »

Freedom2013 wrote:Props to Bernard Hopkins for being a good sport after the fight.

Yep, he was true gent. He's had his moments Hopkins and come out with some crap like the never lose to a white boy thing but my god he's been a boxing legend and it's pretty much impossible not to admire him, isn't it?

If i were him I'd retire now and put my feet up but knowing Hopkins i wouldn't bet on that. I'd give him a reasonable chance against Stephenson.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13111
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Freedom2013 wrote:Props to Bernard Hopkins for being a good sport after the fight.
I was interested in what he had to say, and he was humble. But I guess he would've kinda looked a jackass if he hadn't given Kovalev credit for the shutout.
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by observer1 »

crusader wrote:
observer1 wrote:
crusader wrote:I'm not usually one to be wise after the fact, but people really thought Krusher had no skills? That he was just a bigger lumberer like Pavlik?
Pavlik and Kovalev actually fight remarkably similar....

Kovalev is obviously just much bigger/broader.
I think Kov is more accurate, fights more intelligently, has faster hands for the weight, better timing, and has displayed significantly more ability to punch while being attacked or pushed back. There are some similarities, such as good power for their weights and their right hands probably being their best shots.
Kovalev definately has the faster hands when compared to Pavlik in his day. Everything else though is very similar. It's uncanny how much alike they are in terms of ring style imo.

Either way, Kovalevs size and willingness to stick to a game plan was the key factor today. He could take Adonis imo.
Boxing Writer
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1347
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by Boxing Writer »

lefty wrote:
Boxing Writer wrote:Kovalev vs Beterbiev will be a HUGE fight two years from now, considering their styles and bad blood between them from the amateurs days.
Was there bad blood between them in the amateurs then? Ps i can see that fight happening a lot sooner than 2 years time if it happens.
Yes, Beterbiev beat Kovalev by slim margin, and Kovalev thought he was robbed. Beterbiev said in one of his interviews he was far from his best shape in that fight but still beat him clearly.
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by observer1 »

Ian1973 wrote:
Freedom2013 wrote:Props to Bernard Hopkins for being a good sport after the fight.

Yep, he was true gent. He's had his moments Hopkins and come out with some crap like the never lose to a white boy thing but my god he's been a boxing legend and it's pretty much impossible not to admire him, isn't it?

If i were him I'd retire now and put my feet up but knowing Hopkins i wouldn't bet on that. I'd give him a reasonable chance against Stephenson.
Any comments he's made have always been to promote a fight and rile up his opponent. It's sad that the average boxing fan still falls for that kind of stuff.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by crusader »

Any comments he's made have always been to promote a fight and rile up his opponent.
Maybe, but how do you know? It seems to me like a fighter could say virtually anything and it could be interpreted this way.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by ikorolev »

lefty wrote:
Boxing Writer wrote:Kovalev vs Beterbiev will be a HUGE fight two years from now, considering their styles and bad blood between them from the amateurs days.
Was there bad blood between them in the amateurs then? Ps i can see that fight happening a lot sooner than 2 years time if it happens.
They fought once in a Russian semi-final before Olympics, and Kovalev thinks that he was robbed. Beterbiev accepts that he didn't have a good fight, because he was already thinking about the final deciding who goes to Olympics.

Kovalev and Beterbiev were sparring partners in many camps of the Russian team.
Ian1973
Middleweight
Posts: 1447
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 14:58

Re: BHop vs Kovalev Discussion

Post by Ian1973 »

observer1 wrote:
Ian1973 wrote:
Freedom2013 wrote:Props to Bernard Hopkins for being a good sport after the fight.

Yep, he was true gent. He's had his moments Hopkins and come out with some crap like the never lose to a white boy thing but my god he's been a boxing legend and it's pretty much impossible not to admire him, isn't it?

If i were him I'd retire now and put my feet up but knowing Hopkins i wouldn't bet on that. I'd give him a reasonable chance against Stephenson.
Any comments he's made have always been to promote a fight and rile up his opponent. It's sad that the average boxing fan still falls for that kind of stuff.

I ain't having a go mate but sometimes when you start mentioning race lines are crossed, people get very upset about that type of thing.
Post Reply