Please stop talking to me.keithmoonhangover wrote:In the past you've said that the BoxRec ratings are not accurate, so why use them here.
Price v Tepper
Re: Price v Tepper
Re: Price v Tepper
Yeah, sure.london wrote:I apologise for giving you some attention you're clearly deranged.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Price v Tepper
Why? I asked you an honest question I didn't know the answer to and you behaved like a spoilt brat.Horse wrote:Please stop talking to me.keithmoonhangover wrote:In the past you've said that the BoxRec ratings are not accurate, so why use them here.
Re: Price v Tepper
I'm not interested in your trolling.keithmoonhangover wrote:Why? I asked you an honest question I didn't know the answer to and you behaved like a spoilt brat.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Price v Tepper
I was asking you a genuine question that I didn't know the answer to. Do you even know what troll means?Horse wrote:I'm not interested in your trolling.keithmoonhangover wrote:Why? I asked you an honest question I didn't know the answer to and you behaved like a spoilt brat.
Re: Price v Tepper
keithmoonhangover wrote:I was asking you a genuine question that I didn't know the answer to. Do you even know what troll means?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Price v Tepper
Intelligent reply Horsey.Horse wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:I was asking you a genuine question that I didn't know the answer to. Do you even know what troll means?
Re: Price v Tepper
I dont see any ground for that claim. Teper is more tested then Joshua. One can argue about Joshuas amateur record as well how impressive he looks against lesser opposition and obvious skills he posses. On Whyte there is nothing to talk about. Joshua hype is exaggerated. Whyte hype is a hot air.london wrote: Firstly, youre clearly the nobody here who comes across as someone who feels that they have massively underachieved in life and takes it out on real people trying to achieve something.
Whyte has already knocked down and beaten Joshua.
The hype around AJ is already Price like.
Teper wouldn't last 3 rounds with Whyte or Joshua.
Whyte KOs the hyped untested AJ within 4 rounds.
Re: Price v Tepper
Yep, there is nothing like an impartial objective Scouser .......mickey1975 wrote:His gay lover Boomer predicted Price to rule the roost, and Swifty, and Selkirk.. He thought it was going to be a Scouse p4p top 5 round about now....forcefraser wrote:Plumbing for Pricey from now on. Poor bugger
Re: Price v Tepper
Have to agree with this. Although unbeaten fighters with ambition like Whyte are a step in the right direction for AJ, beating him is not really a big deal given Whyte is yet to achieve anything himself. The key thing for AJ is that he is fighting opponents who are high achievers themselves and still in their prime and with ambition, or another undefeated prospect on the up who genuinely thinks he can win or trouble AJ. Whyte is an acceptable opponent at this stage, nothing more, and I don't think anybody would be surprised to see him blown out in a round or two.Horse wrote:Beating him is pretty unimpressive and worth very little at this stage. He's a nobody.
Teper is top 15 or so in the world. He's a somebody and beating him is worth far more than beating Whyte.
Re: Price v Tepper
Whyte has potential but has not got the money and the team behind him Joshua has and his trainer is out of action. This fight is too early for Whyte really he wants the money will get beaten but can come again and be successful at a good level. Still the best Joshua has faced though.
Re: Price v Tepper
Nonsense. Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
Re: Price v Tepper
Thanks for that image. Just what I needed on a Monday morning.chiggsy wrote:Yea eddie also said wach and thompson were possible opponents for aj on the 12th of sept.....then pulled gary cornish out of his a*se.
Re: Price v Tepper
Thompson isn't a poor man's anything.Dixonian wrote:Nonsense. Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
Re: Price v Tepper
im hearing its all over for david price, sensible decision if i am proven correct.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Price v Tepper
Utter Tosh, Thompson is a far more accomplished fighter than Harrison, with a much much better chin too.Dixonian wrote:Nonsense. Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
Harrison looked good when fighting part time doormen from Ukraine, or a completely demotivated Danny Williams.
-
big lennox
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2550
- Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44
Re: Price v Tepper
I hope he retires from competing but has a full and interesting career commentating and training and helping people. He is a good commentator and communicator and is bright, so should have a good career ahead of him.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32977
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Price v Tepper
Yeah I'd like to see Price take up a full-time co-commentator / ringside analyst role, ideally with B0xnati0n. He's honest, eloquent & can assess fights well (unless he happens to be fighting in them!). Also, as I think was mentioned previously on the thread, the way he defended Audley from the disgraceful attack by Richard Keys after the Wilder fight was pure class.
Re: Price v Tepper
Dixonian wrote:Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Price v Tepper
Thompson is clearly a top 10 heavyweight after his Solis win.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17123
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Price v Tepper
Something Harrison never was. Not in a top ten worth its salt.PredatorHayds wrote:a top 10 heavyweight.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Price v Tepper
Price vs. Chisora has to be on the cards soon..
Re: Price v Tepper
Yep it was meant to be ironic.crusader wrote:Dixonian wrote:Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
Re: Price v Tepper
It's not tosh. Look, the great man himself once said it on social media: https://twitter.com/audley_harrison/sta ... 9029095424jamesmcdonnell wrote:Utter Tosh, Thompson is a far more accomplished fighter than Harrison, with a much much better chin too.Dixonian wrote:Nonsense. Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
Harrison looked good when fighting part time doormen from Ukraine, or a completely demotivated Danny Williams.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Price v Tepper
I stand corrected, must be true then.