Page 11 of 12

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 19 Jul 2015, 17:11
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:In the past you've said that the BoxRec ratings are not accurate, so why use them here.
Please stop talking to me.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 19 Jul 2015, 17:12
by Horse
london wrote: :lol: I apologise for giving you some attention you're clearly deranged.
Yeah, sure.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 19 Jul 2015, 17:16
by keithmoonhangover
Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:In the past you've said that the BoxRec ratings are not accurate, so why use them here.
Please stop talking to me.
Why? I asked you an honest question I didn't know the answer to and you behaved like a spoilt brat.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 19 Jul 2015, 17:18
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:Why? I asked you an honest question I didn't know the answer to and you behaved like a spoilt brat.
I'm not interested in your trolling.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 19 Jul 2015, 17:20
by keithmoonhangover
Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:Why? I asked you an honest question I didn't know the answer to and you behaved like a spoilt brat.
I'm not interested in your trolling.
I was asking you a genuine question that I didn't know the answer to. Do you even know what troll means?

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 19 Jul 2015, 17:22
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:I was asking you a genuine question that I didn't know the answer to. Do you even know what troll means?
:zzz:

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 19 Jul 2015, 17:25
by keithmoonhangover
Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:I was asking you a genuine question that I didn't know the answer to. Do you even know what troll means?
:zzz:
Intelligent reply Horsey.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 19 Jul 2015, 23:04
by Tarkus
london wrote: Firstly, youre clearly the nobody here who comes across as someone who feels that they have massively underachieved in life and takes it out on real people trying to achieve something.

Whyte has already knocked down and beaten Joshua.

The hype around AJ is already Price like.

Teper wouldn't last 3 rounds with Whyte or Joshua.

Whyte KOs the hyped untested AJ within 4 rounds.
I dont see any ground for that claim. Teper is more tested then Joshua. One can argue about Joshuas amateur record as well how impressive he looks against lesser opposition and obvious skills he posses. On Whyte there is nothing to talk about. Joshua hype is exaggerated. Whyte hype is a hot air.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 03:40
by bripez
mickey1975 wrote:
forcefraser wrote:Plumbing for Pricey from now on. Poor bugger
His gay lover Boomer predicted Price to rule the roost, and Swifty, and Selkirk.. He thought it was going to be a Scouse p4p top 5 round about now....
Yep, there is nothing like an impartial objective Scouser .......


:TU: :bag:

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 03:58
by johnswan1
Horse wrote:Beating him is pretty unimpressive and worth very little at this stage. He's a nobody.

Teper is top 15 or so in the world. He's a somebody and beating him is worth far more than beating Whyte.
Have to agree with this. Although unbeaten fighters with ambition like Whyte are a step in the right direction for AJ, beating him is not really a big deal given Whyte is yet to achieve anything himself. The key thing for AJ is that he is fighting opponents who are high achievers themselves and still in their prime and with ambition, or another undefeated prospect on the up who genuinely thinks he can win or trouble AJ. Whyte is an acceptable opponent at this stage, nothing more, and I don't think anybody would be surprised to see him blown out in a round or two.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 04:56
by rm1
Whyte has potential but has not got the money and the team behind him Joshua has and his trainer is out of action. This fight is too early for Whyte really he wants the money will get beaten but can come again and be successful at a good level. Still the best Joshua has faced though.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 06:00
by Dixonian
sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
Nonsense. Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 06:02
by Dixonian
chiggsy wrote:Yea eddie also said wach and thompson were possible opponents for aj on the 12th of sept.....then pulled gary cornish out of his a*se.
Thanks for that image. Just what I needed on a Monday morning.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 06:44
by Gnome
Dixonian wrote:
sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
Nonsense. Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.
Thompson isn't a poor man's anything.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 09:37
by rhino222
im hearing its all over for david price, sensible decision if i am proven correct.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 10:16
by jamesmcdonnell
Dixonian wrote:
sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
Nonsense. Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.
Utter Tosh, Thompson is a far more accomplished fighter than Harrison, with a much much better chin too.

Harrison looked good when fighting part time doormen from Ukraine, or a completely demotivated Danny Williams.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 13:17
by big lennox
I hope he retires from competing but has a full and interesting career commentating and training and helping people. He is a good commentator and communicator and is bright, so should have a good career ahead of him.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 13:55
by Boxerbeetle
Yeah I'd like to see Price take up a full-time co-commentator / ringside analyst role, ideally with B0xnati0n. He's honest, eloquent & can assess fights well (unless he happens to be fighting in them!). Also, as I think was mentioned previously on the thread, the way he defended Audley from the disgraceful attack by Richard Keys after the Wilder fight was pure class.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 20 Jul 2015, 14:16
by crusader
Dixonian wrote:
sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.
:lol:

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 21 Jul 2015, 03:25
by PredatorHayds
Thompson is clearly a top 10 heavyweight after his Solis win.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 21 Jul 2015, 03:48
by keithmoonhangover
PredatorHayds wrote:a top 10 heavyweight.
Something Harrison never was. Not in a top ten worth its salt.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 21 Jul 2015, 05:56
by wesshaw1985
Price vs. Chisora has to be on the cards soon..

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 21 Jul 2015, 06:01
by Dixonian
crusader wrote:
Dixonian wrote:
sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.
:lol:
Yep it was meant to be ironic.

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 21 Jul 2015, 06:04
by Dixonian
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Dixonian wrote:
sendo wrote:On the flipside, Harrison would have been flattened in one round by Tony Thompson both times. Price is a different level in power to Audley, even though the rest of him is not.
Nonsense. Thompson was just a poor man's Audley Harrison.
Utter Tosh, Thompson is a far more accomplished fighter than Harrison, with a much much better chin too.

Harrison looked good when fighting part time doormen from Ukraine, or a completely demotivated Danny Williams.
It's not tosh. Look, the great man himself once said it on social media: https://twitter.com/audley_harrison/sta ... 9029095424

Re: Price v Tepper

Posted: 21 Jul 2015, 06:21
by jamesmcdonnell
I stand corrected, must be true then.