Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13984
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Evander »

Hail the new champ, good for Joshua :TU:
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Lancenix »

And I do not expect anything different from Wilder on may 21st. and if something similar happens it will be a joke for the American titleholders.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46266
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by gilgamesh »

Lancenix wrote:And I do not expect anything different from Wilder on may 21st. and if something similar happens it will be a joke for the American titleholders.
Even if Wilder gets sparked in the first it probably won't be as bad as Martin's performance here. Martin looked too scared to even throw any meaningful punches.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by punchoutsb »

So when Martin won his title on a fluke knee injury, several posters (including myself) claimed he was the weakest/worst title holder in boxing's history. Thus ends his legacy.

For a guy at his skill level and ability though, this is the absolute best thing that could happen financially. He is now an ex-title holder and a name opponent, and can cash in for the next few years by getting smoked by prospects.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Lancenix »

Champion on his 16th fight. 16 wins, 16 KO's!! Not a bad start to his career and now he has one belt.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Lancenix »

punchoutsb wrote:So when Martin won his title on a fluke knee injury, several posters (including myself) claimed he was the weakest/worst title holder in boxing's history. Thus ends his legacy.

For a guy at his skill level and ability though, this is the absolute best thing that could happen financially. He is now an ex-title holder and a name opponent, and can cash in for the next few years by getting smoked by prospects.
I don't know about that. Did Oliver McCall or Bruce Seldon cash in on their short title reigns? I do not particularly think so.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by punchoutsb »

Lancenix wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:So when Martin won his title on a fluke knee injury, several posters (including myself) claimed he was the weakest/worst title holder in boxing's history. Thus ends his legacy.

For a guy at his skill level and ability though, this is the absolute best thing that could happen financially. He is now an ex-title holder and a name opponent, and can cash in for the next few years by getting smoked by prospects.
I don't know about that. Did Oliver McCall or Bruce Seldon cash in on their short title reigns? I do not particularly think so.
Oliver McCall had an iron chin and Bruce Seldon threw punches without picking his feet up, so neither is really comparable to Martin.

But yes, both did earn good money following their title reigns. Expect to see Martin fighting in Germany, Russia, and the UK a lot in the near future.
Taki...
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 936
Joined: 30 Jun 2005, 15:46

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Taki... »

Lancenix wrote:
Taki... wrote:That was quick. Does this show how good Whyte was or how bad Martin is?
Martin looked really bad and totally stiff. He prepared but looked unprepared and was scared to throw his left because he was getting hit by Joshua's right. He had nothing for him.
Certain posters who talked up Martin must be feeling a wee bit silly right about now.
Joshua looks the business, but Martin didn't look top 20 let alone world champion material.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Lancenix »

punchoutsb wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:So when Martin won his title on a fluke knee injury, several posters (including myself) claimed he was the weakest/worst title holder in boxing's history. Thus ends his legacy.

For a guy at his skill level and ability though, this is the absolute best thing that could happen financially. He is now an ex-title holder and a name opponent, and can cash in for the next few years by getting smoked by prospects.
I don't know about that. Did Oliver McCall or Bruce Seldon cash in on their short title reigns? I do not particularly think so.
Oliver McCall had an iron chin and Bruce Seldon threw punches without picking his feet up, so neither is really comparable to Martin.

But yes, both did earn good money following their title reigns. Expect to see Martin fighting in Germany, Russia, and the UK a lot in the near future.
I disagree. His title was won on a fluke and I do not know what the future holds for him. Oliver McCall had more than a good chin. He has one of the best chins for anyone in the history of the sport. But he did not cash in per se. I was not comparing their styles and neither were you you are saying martin can cash on on his title. I disagree.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by punchoutsb »

Lancenix wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
I don't know about that. Did Oliver McCall or Bruce Seldon cash in on their short title reigns? I do not particularly think so.
Oliver McCall had an iron chin and Bruce Seldon threw punches without picking his feet up, so neither is really comparable to Martin.

But yes, both did earn good money following their title reigns. Expect to see Martin fighting in Germany, Russia, and the UK a lot in the near future.
I disagree. His title was won on a fluke and I do not know what the future holds for him. Oliver McCall had more than a good chin. He has one of the best chins for anyone in the history of the sport. But he did not cash in per se. I was not comparing their styles and neither were you you are saying martin can cash on on his title. I disagree.
That's perfectly fine, I didn't ask you to :TU:
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Lancenix »

Taki... wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
Taki... wrote:That was quick. Does this show how good Whyte was or how bad Martin is?
Martin looked really bad and totally stiff. He prepared but looked unprepared and was scared to throw his left because he was getting hit by Joshua's right. He had nothing for him.
Certain posters who talked up Martin must be feeling a wee bit silly right about now.
Joshua looks the business, but Martin didn't look top 20 let alone world champion material.
I agree. Fury picked martin to KO Joshua but I think he did it to disrespect Joshua. Joshua could be the best in the world.
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Freedom2013 »

I was overrating Martin.

I picked Joshua to beat him by KO 5, but Martin isn't as durable as I thought and was stopped in round 2.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16418
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Nightmare Roy »

ikorolev wrote:
kaiserbill wrote:Do NOT fight in Britain.
I thought this was well understood.
What does it to do with anything in this case ? Martin was an embarrassment.
lol Martin bottled it, got up bang on 10 knowing it would be stopped, he wanted out of there ASAP.
Batley18
Super Middleweight
Posts: 567
Joined: 18 Sep 2012, 06:29

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Batley18 »

Martin was trying to work his way into the fight and got tagged. Two big knock downs. Didnt see much head movement by either, but there has to be a lot of respect for AJs power.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Lancenix »

punchoutsb wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
Oliver McCall had an iron chin and Bruce Seldon threw punches without picking his feet up, so neither is really comparable to Martin.

But yes, both did earn good money following their title reigns. Expect to see Martin fighting in Germany, Russia, and the UK a lot in the near future.
I disagree. His title was won on a fluke and I do not know what the future holds for him. Oliver McCall had more than a good chin. He has one of the best chins for anyone in the history of the sport. But he did not cash in per se. I was not comparing their styles and neither were you you are saying martin can cash on on his title. I disagree.
That's perfectly fine, I didn't ask you to :TU:
You really did not have a point anyway. You were all over the place. First saying he can make a living off the belt then you were comparing styles. You just were not very cogent. :TU:
Taki...
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 936
Joined: 30 Jun 2005, 15:46

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Taki... »

Lancenix wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:So when Martin won his title on a fluke knee injury, several posters (including myself) claimed he was the weakest/worst title holder in boxing's history. Thus ends his legacy.

For a guy at his skill level and ability though, this is the absolute best thing that could happen financially. He is now an ex-title holder and a name opponent, and can cash in for the next few years by getting smoked by prospects.
I don't know about that. Did Oliver McCall or Bruce Seldon cash in on their short title reigns? I do not particularly think so.
If Martin is as bad as he looked, tonight was a career payday. Pretty sure I read somewhere he made more for this fight than Wilder is getting for going to Russia. Cashed his golden ticket in against biggest payday in HW boxing right now.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Lancenix »

Taki... wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:So when Martin won his title on a fluke knee injury, several posters (including myself) claimed he was the weakest/worst title holder in boxing's history. Thus ends his legacy.

For a guy at his skill level and ability though, this is the absolute best thing that could happen financially. He is now an ex-title holder and a name opponent, and can cash in for the next few years by getting smoked by prospects.
I don't know about that. Did Oliver McCall or Bruce Seldon cash in on their short title reigns? I do not particularly think so.
If Martin is as bad as he looked, tonight was a career payday. Pretty sure I read somewhere he made more for this fight than Wilder is getting for going to Russia. Cashed his golden ticket in against biggest payday in HW boxing right now.
Yep. Right on the money Taki. :TU:
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by lillywhite14 »

punchoutsb wrote:So when Martin won his title on a fluke knee injury, several posters (including myself) claimed he was the weakest/worst title holder in boxing's history. Thus ends his legacy.

For a guy at his skill level and ability though, this is the absolute best thing that could happen financially. He is now an ex-title holder and a name opponent, and can cash in for the next few years by getting smoked by prospects.
He won't need to fight or work another day in his life. Rumour has it he picked up a cool £5m tonight for his troubles. Starting to make sense why he wanted to fight Joshua in England!
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Joshua walks right through Fury. I'm loving that so many people think otherwise. Easy money at the books.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Lancenix »

lillywhite14 wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:So when Martin won his title on a fluke knee injury, several posters (including myself) claimed he was the weakest/worst title holder in boxing's history. Thus ends his legacy.

For a guy at his skill level and ability though, this is the absolute best thing that could happen financially. He is now an ex-title holder and a name opponent, and can cash in for the next few years by getting smoked by prospects.
He won't need to fight or work another day in his life. Rumour has it he picked up a cool £5m tonight for his troubles. Starting to make sense why he wanted to fight Joshua in England!
I am sure he wanted the money but no one wants to go out like that whop fights for a living.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by BitPlayer »

Lol, Martin was pathetic, I hoped he'd do so much more.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Rexob »

Taki... wrote:
Lancenix wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:So when Martin won his title on a fluke knee injury, several posters (including myself) claimed he was the weakest/worst title holder in boxing's history. Thus ends his legacy.

For a guy at his skill level and ability though, this is the absolute best thing that could happen financially. He is now an ex-title holder and a name opponent, and can cash in for the next few years by getting smoked by prospects.
I don't know about that. Did Oliver McCall or Bruce Seldon cash in on their short title reigns? I do not particularly think so.
If Martin is as bad as he looked, tonight was a career payday. Pretty sure I read somewhere he made more for this fight than Wilder is getting for going to Russia. Cashed his golden ticket in against biggest payday in HW boxing right now.

That's exactly what he has done fairplay to him :clap: :TU:
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by Lancenix »

Riddick Blowe wrote:Joshua walks right through Fury. I'm loving that so many people think otherwise. Easy money at the books.
Fury is really tough to hit though. That fight would be more tricky than it looks. I would love to see it. I hope it happens. Possibly the biggest fight in UK history.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by punchoutsb »

Lancenix wrote:You really did not have a point anyway. You were all over the place. First saying he can make a living off the belt then you were comparing styles. You just were not very cogent. :TU:
Martin will be getting paid now as fodder for prospects, money/fights he would not have gotten otherwise. That was very clearly stated.

For some reason you felt the need to offer up some un-requested and unrelated blurb on McCall and Seldon, who are in no way comparable to Martin. :clap:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46266
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Charles Martin v Anthony Joshua

Post by gilgamesh »

I can't remember what section it was in, but there was a thread recently asking who was the Worst Titleholder at Heavyweight since 2000. I voted for Briggs, but after today I'd definitely go with Charles Martin. Martin looked terrible.
Post Reply