BoxRec

Horse wrote:Selby vs Warrington is a fight that should happen next.

Selby would be a significant favourite, but Selby really isn't anything special and I think some posters should try to jump off his todger, if possible.

Exoddus wrote:

Horse wrote:Selby vs Warrington is a fight that should happen next.

Selby would be a significant favourite, but Selby really isn't anything special and I think some posters should try to jump off his todger, if possible.

I agree. I don't think Selby is anything special either. However, I'm pretty sure he'll beat Warrington.

expe wrote:McCrory biased as eff because Hall's his mate, ref let Hall get away with far too much in there.

Finished up with 117-112 Guerrero, maybe a bit wide but I favoured him in most of the close rounds, outworked Hall in most of them.

nick885 wrote:

expe wrote:McCrory biased as eff because Hall's his mate, ref let Hall get away with far too much in there.

Finished up with 117-112 Guerrero, maybe a bit wide but I favoured him in most of the close rounds, outworked Hall in most of them.

Strange that the three judges in different positions around the ring one of which doesn't like Hall all gave it to hall UD

expe wrote:And were roundly criticised for their terrible scorecards.

Horse wrote:

expe wrote:And were roundly criticised for their terrible scorecards.

You had the gayest scorecard going.

expe wrote:

Something you want to tell us Horse?

Autobarn wrote:Thanks for clarifying about Amagasa and his weight.

However he'd only competed to my knowledge at a good level at 122 - where he faced Rigondeaux in that very good fight and also in another good battle, Ryol Li Lee in that revenge win.

I think Warrington is a solid and strong boxer and will have a good fight with Selby, who is often open and off balance.

Horse wrote:

expe wrote:

Something you want to tell us Horse?

That you are a gaylord?

That's not for me to say.

expe wrote:You've got issues, that's something anyone can say.

GlobalBox wrote:HYF could u have a 120-107 did I miss something

keirw wrote:Judging was terrible tonight (Warrington somehow won 13 rounds? Really?).
But there were two very very good fights tonight, I must admit I expected both visitors to win but I don't mind being wrong from time to time.

As good as tonights fights were I didn't see anything from Hall or Warrington that would trouble Haskins or Selby respectively, but they have earned their shots after tonight

Horse wrote:

expe wrote:You've got issues, that's something anyone can say.

With your absurd scorecard you have shown yourself to be a traitor to this great nation.

The punishment for this treachery is, perhaps, death.

nick885 wrote:

keirw wrote:Judging was terrible tonight (Warrington somehow won 13 rounds? Really?).
But there were two very very good fights tonight, I must admit I expected both visitors to win but I don't mind being wrong from time to time.

As good as tonights fights were I didn't see anything from Hall or Warrington that would trouble Haskins or Selby respectively, but they have earned their shots after tonight

Getting in the ring with hall troubles the one that didn't win a title, yes the one that even his own fans that were there on the night thought haskins lost against hall.

Autobarn wrote:Glad I was there for a genuine battle featuring exciting changes of momentum. Wanted to get a friend of mine into boxing, show him some value for money - in the wake of the easy recent wins by AJ and Kell Brook.

Was surprised at the scoring because Amagasa bossed the middle rounds, won the last - and the first few were nip and tuck.

Warrington won rounds 9-11 pretty big - really jolted Amagasa at times - but couldn't follow through.

Warrington - and Hall - were nothing really special as they faced world class opponents moving up in weight, coming to their country - and it was slightly disappointing to see both apparently, concede the final round of their fights.

If we can forget about the scoring, that was a proper fight. It was no Brodie-Chi 1 but it was a fine fight. Probably a great learning experience for Warrington who threw some beautiful punches but needed more volume and variety.

Let's not forget Selby made some mistakes in his recent fight. Think they can get together and have a good 'un.

expe wrote:

nick885 wrote:

expe wrote:McCrory biased as eff because Hall's his mate, ref let Hall get away with far too much in there.

Finished up with 117-112 Guerrero, maybe a bit wide but I favoured him in most of the close rounds, outworked Hall in most of them.

Strange that the three judges in different positions around the ring one of which doesn't like Hall all gave it to hall UD

And were roundly criticised for their terrible scorecards.

expe wrote:

nick885 wrote:

keirw wrote:Judging was terrible tonight (Warrington somehow won 13 rounds? Really?).
But there were two very very good fights tonight, I must admit I expected both visitors to win but I don't mind being wrong from time to time.

As good as tonights fights were I didn't see anything from Hall or Warrington that would trouble Haskins or Selby respectively, but they have earned their shots after tonight

Getting in the ring with hall troubles the one that didn't win a title, yes the one that even his own fans that were there on the night thought haskins lost against hall.

This shite again. You are the only person I've seen that has even tried to claim Hall won that fight. Al Bernstein had it 117-111, case closed.

nick885 wrote:

expe wrote:

nick885 wrote:
Strange that the three judges in different positions around the ring one of which doesn't like Hall all gave it to hall UD

And were roundly criticised for their terrible scorecards.

Criticised by who, where were they and you sat in the Arena, the punches that land on arms,gloves and around the back do not score hall's landed on target.

expe wrote:Finished up with 117-112 Guerrero, maybe a bit wide but I favoured him in most of the close rounds, outworked Hall in most of them.

Dan Dares wrote:

expe wrote:Finished up with 117-112 Guerrero, maybe a bit wide but I favoured him in most of the close rounds, outworked Hall in most of them.

His workrate was good but he landed eff all. Hall's shots were much more effective. Look at Hall's boat afterwards. Not a mark on it. 117-112 Guerrero my arse.

crusader wrote:Eff all?

That's a bit strong. Hall was more effective, but I saw Guerrero land a decent number of shots and thought he won 5 rounds. Sometimes faces don't tell the whole story, especially when one fighter is focused on the body.

expe wrote:

Horse wrote:

expe wrote:You've got issues, that's something anyone can say.

With your absurd scorecard you have shown yourself to be a traitor to this great nation.

The punishment for this treachery is, perhaps, death.