Page 11 of 12

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 14 Sep 2016, 09:02
by SaadOffTheDeck
Total non story.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 14 Sep 2016, 15:03
by foxdog1923
boxing_rocks wrote: So, no comments about top athletes legally using steroids for years?
Well so far these hacktavists are Russian. So its clearly a retaliation due to the huge amounts of doping that the Russians are now quite well known for.

As always, I listen to both sides before I jump off the cliff. Ill wait till I hear what the accused has to say.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 14 Sep 2016, 15:57
by SaadOffTheDeck
foxdog1923 wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote: So, no comments about top athletes legally using steroids for years?
Well so far these hacktavists are Russian. So its clearly a retaliation due to the huge amounts of doping that the Russians are now quite well known for.

As always, I listen to both sides before I jump off the cliff. Ill wait till I hear what the accused has to say.
It's all documented exceptions for medical situations. Could that be exploited? Of course, has any wrong doing been uncovered? zip

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 14 Sep 2016, 18:05
by boxing_rocks
So, now we know why Williams sisters have bodybuilders muscle getting unfair advantage. Having a "legal" excuse doesn't change the fact that steroids helped them for years to be stronger.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 14 Sep 2016, 18:23
by asdfjkl
foxdog1923 wrote:
crow wrote: The media is legally allowed to lie.

There's no law forcing them to tell the truth to their audience, contrary to what they like to advertise to the gullible ones (like yourself).
Please provide proof where I have stated (in the post underneath that you are referring too) the media is not allowed to lie. This is important to your arguement that you prove that Ive said 'the media is not allowed to lie...you should believe what they say' or something like that otherwise you have just made yourself look STUPID.
foxdog1923 wrote:
To find out if its solid information or not, you wait to see if it comes on your nations 6pm TV News. If its not on there, then its bullshit. TV news has a huge organisation and everything has to be solid before it goes on there. Small current affairs like this just isnt trustworthy. Ill be looking for the news tonight to confirm all this.
You say the media is allowed to lie. So? Did I say theyre not? No. I actually acknowledged that there is bullshit media out there, this suggests I know theres bullshit media. Fuk you look dumb right now. Go wipe your bum cos I just made you sh1t your pants haha.

Love knocking these idiots out, too easy.
You're that retard that believed Povetkin broke a rule aren't you? Despite me telling you countless of times Povetkin is an innocent men? TBH I think most people won't even bother about knocking you out. You're like the Charlie Zelenof of keyboardwarriors.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 14 Sep 2016, 19:09
by BAD INTENTIONS
The rest of the world governments are just screwing the non-rich person over.
The US does that too, but we also have to distract our citizens from the MILLIONS of murder we commit.

Therefore, many of you guys weren't subject to our "War distractions ... um, Clean Up Baseball" era.
We watched our athletes risk and receive federal jail time crying they never took PEDs in front of Congress.
After that, NO AMERICAN trusts any athlete after failing a drug test. They lie 99% of the time.

For some reason, Russians (and Russian sympathizers :lol: ) seem to believe the BS their athletes say.
But we've heard it all already.
We've been through court cases.
We've been through the media circus.

This is one situation I think Americans might be more educated about that people around the world ... strange.
Funny how athletes who use more "science" than ever are getting busted for "useless" chemicals.
We just realized they are ALL masking agents.

When will the rest of the world catch up :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 14 Sep 2016, 19:35
by foxdog1923
asdfjkl wrote:
You're that retard that believed Povetkin broke a rule aren't you? Despite me telling you countless of times Povetkin is an innocent men? TBH I think most people won't even bother about knocking you out. You're like the Charlie Zelenof of keyboardwarriors.
No you are CLEARLY the one everyone hates. The only ones that like you is your other accounts that the moderators know about through your IP address lol.

And like we keep calling you, youre just a boy who makes stupid comments. Povetkin had meldonium, thats what I was saying, is that correct? Yes Im correct. Now shut da fuk up crow or asdfjkl or whatever your name is. Im waiting for crows response...

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 02:16
by asdfjkl
foxdog1923 wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
You're that retard that believed Povetkin broke a rule aren't you? Despite me telling you countless of times Povetkin is an innocent men? TBH I think most people won't even bother about knocking you out. You're like the Charlie Zelenof of keyboardwarriors.
No you are CLEARLY the one everyone hates. The only ones that like you is your other accounts that the moderators know about through your IP address lol.

And like we keep calling you, youre just a boy who makes stupid comments. Povetkin had meldonium, thats what I was saying, is that correct? Yes Im correct. Now shut da fuk up crow or asdfjkl or whatever your name is. Im waiting for crows response...
This is my only account on boxrec lol, suggesting else just proves even more how retarded you are.
That's not the only thing you have said, also note that there's nothing wrong with owning meldonium, especially not at the time Povetkin used it.
Sadly everybody but Povetkin and his team screwed up.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 02:46
by foxdog1923
asdfjkl wrote:
foxdog1923 wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
You're that retard that believed Povetkin broke a rule aren't you? Despite me telling you countless of times Povetkin is an innocent men? TBH I think most people won't even bother about knocking you out. You're like the Charlie Zelenof of keyboardwarriors.
No you are CLEARLY the one everyone hates. The only ones that like you is your other accounts that the moderators know about through your IP address lol.

And like we keep calling you, youre just a boy who makes stupid comments. Povetkin had meldonium, thats what I was saying, is that correct? Yes Im correct. Now shut da fuk up crow or asdfjkl or whatever your name is. Im waiting for crows response...
This is my only account on boxrec lol, suggesting else just proves even more how retarded you are.
That's not the only thing you have said, also note that there's nothing wrong with owning meldonium, especially not at the time Povetkin used it.
Sadly everybody but Povetkin and his team screwed up.
Straight after you mention the word retarded, you go onto lead a paragraph with an unsupported point and THATS retarded.

Go to school boy.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 06:16
by crow
foxdog1923 wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
foxdog1923 wrote: No you are CLEARLY the one everyone hates. The only ones that like you is your other accounts that the moderators know about through your IP address lol.

And like we keep calling you, youre just a boy who makes stupid comments. Povetkin had meldonium, thats what I was saying, is that correct? Yes Im correct. Now shut da fuk up crow or asdfjkl or whatever your name is. Im waiting for crows response...
This is my only account on boxrec lol, suggesting else just proves even more how retarded you are.
That's not the only thing you have said, also note that there's nothing wrong with owning meldonium, especially not at the time Povetkin used it.
Sadly everybody but Povetkin and his team screwed up.
Straight after you mention the word retarded, you go onto lead a paragraph with an unsupported point and THATS retarded.

Go to school boy.
Congratulations for winning the "2016 Boxrec's forum biggest smart talking idiot" award.

You're in a class of your own.

Now, you can at last buy those expensive LED lights for your Moma basement .

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 06:47
by foxdog1923
foxdog1923 wrote:
crow wrote: The media is legally allowed to lie.

There's no law forcing them to tell the truth to their audience, contrary to what they like to advertise to the gullible ones (like yourself).
Please provide proof where I have stated (in the post underneath that you are referring too) the media is not allowed to lie. This is important to your arguement that you prove that Ive said 'the media is not allowed to lie...you should believe what they say' or something like that otherwise you have just made yourself look STUPID.
foxdog1923 wrote:
To find out if its solid information or not, you wait to see if it comes on your nations 6pm TV News. If its not on there, then its bullshit. TV news has a huge organisation and everything has to be solid before it goes on there. Small current affairs like this just isnt trustworthy. Ill be looking for the news tonight to confirm all this.
You say the media is allowed to lie. So? Did I say theyre not? No. I actually acknowledged that there is bullshit media out there, this suggests I know theres bullshit media. Fuk you look dumb right now. Go wipe your bum cos I just made you sh1t your pants haha.

Love knocking these idiots out, too easy.
Oh whats this post above. Haha someone gettin KNOCKED!

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 14:49
by asdfjkl
foxdog1923 wrote:
foxdog1923 wrote:
crow wrote: The media is legally allowed to lie.

There's no law forcing them to tell the truth to their audience, contrary to what they like to advertise to the gullible ones (like yourself).
Please provide proof where I have stated (in the post underneath that you are referring too) the media is not allowed to lie. This is important to your arguement that you prove that Ive said 'the media is not allowed to lie...you should believe what they say' or something like that otherwise you have just made yourself look STUPID.
foxdog1923 wrote:
To find out if its solid information or not, you wait to see if it comes on your nations 6pm TV News. If its not on there, then its bullshit. TV news has a huge organisation and everything has to be solid before it goes on there. Small current affairs like this just isnt trustworthy. Ill be looking for the news tonight to confirm all this.
You say the media is allowed to lie. So? Did I say theyre not? No. I actually acknowledged that there is bullshit media out there, this suggests I know theres bullshit media. Fuk you look dumb right now. Go wipe your bum cos I just made you sh1t your pants haha.

Love knocking these idiots out, too easy.
Oh whats this post above. Haha someone gettin KNOCKED!
Foxdog, nobody has ever said Povetkin didn't take meldonium, even the people supporting him, even he himself hasn't. So repeating that doesn't prove anything. The fact of the matter is that you spreaded piles and piles of nonsense, despite me proving you wrong time over time again.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 14:59
by SaadOffTheDeck
boxing_rocks wrote:So, now we know why Williams sisters have bodybuilders muscle getting unfair advantage. Having a "legal" excuse doesn't change the fact that steroids helped them for years to be stronger.
The majority of athletes are/were on something. This hack produced nothing.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 15:31
by greg
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:So, now we know why Williams sisters have bodybuilders muscle getting unfair advantage. Having a "legal" excuse doesn't change the fact that steroids helped them for years to be stronger.
The majority of athletes are/were on something. This hack produced nothing.
...Saad, I don't quite agree with that...one thing is to assume that the majority of athletes are/were on something. It's different when you have documents proving beyond reasonable doubt that this or that sportsman/woman actually uses the substance. Actually, I tend to believe that if a sportman uses prohibited substance on prescription, this information should be in the public domain.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 15:37
by SaadOffTheDeck
greg wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:So, now we know why Williams sisters have bodybuilders muscle getting unfair advantage. Having a "legal" excuse doesn't change the fact that steroids helped them for years to be stronger.
The majority of athletes are/were on something. This hack produced nothing.
...Saad, I don't quite agree with that...one thing is to assume that the majority of athletes are/were on something. It's different when you have documents proving beyond reasonable doubt that this or that sportsman/woman actually uses the substance. Actually, I tend to believe that if a sportman uses prohibited substance on prescription, this information should be in the public domain.
Venus has a disease. While Prednisone is a steroid. I've never heard of it being used as a performance enhancer. Not defending them, just saying this report won't generate anything but talk.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 15:44
by SaadOffTheDeck
I totally agree that should be made public.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 16:18
by foxdog1923
asdfjkl wrote: Foxdog, nobody has ever said Povetkin didn't take meldonium, even the people supporting him, even he himself hasn't. So repeating that doesn't prove anything. The fact of the matter is that you spreaded piles and piles of nonsense, despite me proving you wrong time over time again.
Oh shut up about Povetkin and meldonium. Weve already debated that over and over not only with me but plenty of others as well so please, shut da fuk up about that you stupid boy.

Whats the story with Riabinskys lawsuit? Nothing?

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 16:23
by asdfjkl
foxdog1923 wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: Foxdog, nobody has ever said Povetkin didn't take meldonium, even the people supporting him, even he himself hasn't. So repeating that doesn't prove anything. The fact of the matter is that you spreaded piles and piles of nonsense, despite me proving you wrong time over time again.
Oh shut up about Povetkin and meldonium. Weve already debated that over and over not only with me but plenty of others as well so please, shut da fuk up about that you stupid boy.

Whats the story with Riabinskys lawsuit? Nothing?
It's still going on, but as you might know, Americans are often quite slow and retarded, so it might take a while before that's finished.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 18:06
by tiny_acres
asdfjkl wrote:
foxdog1923 wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: Foxdog, nobody has ever said Povetkin didn't take meldonium, even the people supporting him, even he himself hasn't. So repeating that doesn't prove anything. The fact of the matter is that you spreaded piles and piles of nonsense, despite me proving you wrong time over time again.
Oh shut up about Povetkin and meldonium. Weve already debated that over and over not only with me but plenty of others as well so please, shut da fuk up about that you stupid boy.

Whats the story with Riabinskys lawsuit? Nothing?
It's still going on, but as you might know, Americans are often quite slow and retarded, so it might take a while before that's finished.

Dude reading your posts make me want to puke.
You are by far the most annoying and retarded fuck8ng piece of shit on this forum.
You make Kalan look like a fornicating rocket scientist.

Foe God's sake please shut the fornicate up

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 20:34
by Badhusker
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:So, now we know why Williams sisters have bodybuilders muscle getting unfair advantage. Having a "legal" excuse doesn't change the fact that steroids helped them for years to be stronger.
The majority of athletes are/were on something. This hack produced nothing.


Exactly right I am thinking. Even Victor Conte said if you get caught with any kind of PED, it is more of a sign of stupidity than anything else. Povetkin and his crew just aren't that smart. You don't test clean a few times then all of a sudden test dirty. Screw up in the masking agents.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 16 Sep 2016, 01:44
by foxdog1923
asdfjkl wrote: It's still going on, but as you might know, Americans are often quite slow and retarded, so it might take a while before that's finished.
No I dont know that cos thats you just being stupid and I dont think like that. Anyway I forgot how immature you are and Im stupid for ever replying to your posts thinking Im going to be any wiser. Do not talk to me or reply to my posts EVER! FREAK!

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 16 Sep 2016, 02:40
by The Law
Guys, please stop using insults and debate in a civilised manner or a few bans will be issued.

I don't want to know who started it. Just please stop the insulting or there will be a clear out.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 16 Sep 2016, 04:15
by foxdog1923
Its clear theres some country hating here. I mightve mentioned Russian drug cheats but thats an international view based on countless, record setting failed doping tests, not something I made up. However these other country insults are that of a potential terrorist.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 16 Sep 2016, 05:33
by Killer Blow
Jekyll is definitely a Russian nationalist in disguise.

Re: Ryabinsky sues DiBella and Wilder

Posted: 16 Sep 2016, 08:07
by asdfjkl
Well I'm actually not making anything up,

https://law.und.edu/_files/docs/ndlr/pd ... dlr813.pdf

American professional sports is a dopers paradise.
I can easely write down a 100 names of American doping cheaters.

And the William sisters mentioned above aren't even in it.