Onetimeonly wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 20:33
I can tell, he quoted me on some question he never asked me. Poor little guy. At least he's a fight fan. Maybe someday hell get laid and care more about the actual fights than the board arguments. Yeah, that's it. He just needs some dick.
LMFAO!!!! I've been laughing myself to tears the last 10 minutes! EO shifts his venom to whomever provides a response. You're right; what he needs is a good stiff cvck!
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 20:35
You say I've got problems but you're utterly powerless to defend your own stance and this upset you.
Check the posting history in this thread, you'll find that you kept avoiding answering the very same question time-and-time again. The reason for this is rather obvious, but you're not man enough to admit it.
Um...I choose not to? It's much more entertaining this way.
Ilya Muromets wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 20:25
IMHO Crawford should have been disqualified and Khan declared the winner OR the fight declared a NC. Also the clown dressed up in the referee suit should get in the long line of refs and boxing judges to be investigated - and drug tested too -but that line already stretches out on to the street and around the block! Put those shill announcers on the line too.
IKSRTFO wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 20:11
Reach is subjective. By what you're saying, Aguello is a heavy because he has a longer reach than Tyson, Tua, and Marciano.
Paul Williams had a longer reach than most heavyweights but would be a small super middle.
Who wrote that Crawford's reach equates him to a light heavyweight? False conclusion.
Reach is not subjective; It is a measurement. Measurements are not subjective, they are objective, by definition. As Crawford has a 74" reach, and at 69" height, with a significant re-hydration weight. He's hardly a small welterweight. That is a point this "Enlightened One" is making. I concur.
sturm vogel wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 21:42
Who wrote that Crawford's reach equates him to a light heavyweight? False conclusion.
Reach is not subjective; It is a measurement. Measurements are not subjective, they are objective, by definition. As Crawford has a 74" reach, and at 69" height, with a significant re-hydration weight. He's hardly a small welterweight. That is a point this "Enlightened One" is making. I concur.
Y'all were arguing Crawford was that much bigger than Khan based on a reach measurement. Anyone can a longer reach yet be smaller.
And I have yet to here anyone even post one of Crawford's rehydration weights. And no, his weight when he isn't fighting at all doesn't count.
And I find it odd that Crawford and weight bully are in the same sentence in a weight class that Errol Spence campaigns at.
IKSRTFO wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 21:48
Y'all were arguing Crawford was that much bigger than Khan based on a reach measurement. Anyone can a longer reach yet be smaller.
And I have yet to here anyone even post one of Crawford's rehydration weights. And no, his weight when he isn't fighting at all doesn't count.
And I find it odd that Crawford and weight bully are in the same sentence in a weight class that Errol Spence campaigns at.
The ONLY point I made is Crawford's dimensions indicate he's no small welterweight. I do not argue anything else.
sturm vogel wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 21:52
The ONLY point I made is Crawford's dimensions indicate he's no small welterweight. I do not argue anything else.
He's not a large welterweight neither. He's around the same size as Khan.
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 20:17
WTF is wrong with this forum? Since when has someone’s preferred opinion become more important and more meaningful than the objective facts of reality?
When? Always!
Two Netherlands bending over a deer arguing who gets credit for the kill. One has blood on his hands the other spins a good story, whom do you think the tribe will believe?
BIGDOUG58 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 22:51
If Khan had of hit Crawford low and Crawford could not have continued, Khan would of been disqualified. PERIOD.
He quit. Get over it. And no, you do not know that. First of all, Crawford would not have quit. He would have taken the time to recover and proceeded to KTFO Khan.
Khan did NOT take the time to recover because he was done. He saw the exit sign and took it. PERIOD.
ironbeard wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 21:36
You should be drug tested.
Ha ha OK - as long as it's not some wise guys from Las Vegas doing the testing!
"You know, Mr Murometz, we sure do hate to see peoples' careers ruined if they fail our VADA drug test. It makes us so sad when that happens. By the way, baby needs a new pair of shoes."
ironbeard wrote: ↑21 Apr 2019, 23:38
He quit. Get over it. And no, you do not know that. First of all, Crawford would not have quit. He would have taken the time to recover and proceeded to KTFO Khan.
Khan did NOT take the time to recover because he was done. He saw the exit sign and took it. PERIOD.
The house ref was yelling in his face, "Do you want to continue!?" It was bull s hit.
It's much more entertaining this way. 
Never been. You must be mistaking me for your boyfriend.