BoxRec

haben wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:34 There were 2 or 3 very close rounds, rounds 2 and 4 were hard to split, I had Kovalev winning round 2 and Canelo winning round 4 but it could've been anyone's.

There were rounds where Kovalev's punches bounced of gloves and his jabs were only touching but Canelo landed clean shots.

That is the type of fight you have to sit ringside to really see the clear pattern of the fight.

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:29

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:24
Even more bitterness aimed at undermining Canelo’s feat.

People are so bitter nowadays!

What you think about the scorecards?

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:40

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:29



What you think about the scorecards?

Irrelevant in relation to the outcome of the fight itself.

We should be talking about the fight itself and Canelo’s victory, since he stopped Kovalev.

None of Canelo’s detractors would have ever agreed with the judges scorecards, unless they’d awarded every single round to Kovalev.

Have you read some of the anti-Canelo remarks accusing Kovalev of fighting as if he’d been paid off, with the very same people also moaning about the corrupt scorecards?

What’s it to be, both accusations can be true can they?

If it rains in Las Vegas today, would that be Canelo’s fault also?

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:40

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:29



What you think about the scorecards?

Irrelevant in relation to the outcome of the fight itself.

We should be talking about the fight itself and Canelo’s victory, since he stopped Kovalev.

None of Canelo’s detractors would have ever agreed with the judges scorecards, unless they’d awarded every single round to Kovalev.

Have you read some of the anti-Canelo remarks accusing Kovalev of fighting as if he’d been paid off, with the very same people also moaning about the corrupt scorecards?

What’s it to be, both accusations can be true can they?

If it rains in Las Vegas today, would that be Canelo’s fault also?

ewenhay wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:42

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:40
Irrelevant in relation to the outcome of the fight itself.

We should be talking about the fight itself and Canelo’s victory, since he stopped Kovalev.

None of Canelo’s detractors would have ever agreed with the judges scorecards, unless they’d awarded every single round to Kovalev.

Have you read some of the anti-Canelo remarks accusing Kovalev of fighting as if he’d been paid off, with the very same people also moaning about the corrupt scorecards?

What’s it to be, both accusations can be true can they?

If it rains in Las Vegas today, would that be Canelo’s fault also?

You never answered his question

What was your scorecard?

I'd imagine you had Alvarez well ahead.

You've always been biased against Golovkin and Kovalev.

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:51

ewenhay wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:42

You never answered his question

What was your scorecard?

I'd imagine you had Alvarez well ahead.

You've always been biased against Golovkin and Kovalev.

I didn’t have Canelo well ahead.

I have never disliked GGG either. My comments have always related to my dislike of Sanchez, Loeffler, K2, his teams false claims, his illogical fans and also the calibre of opposition Gennadiy has faced.

My dislike of Krusher generally relate to his out of ring antics. And let’s face it, if you feel he doesn’t deserve to be criticised for some of the stuff he’s done, then you’re either an idiot or ignorant.

I have ALWAYS been complementary about the pugilistic skills and overall fighting ability of Krusher and GGG.

And it’ll be categorically impossible for you to prove otherwise, but I’d really love to see you try.

Come on kid, try to prove me wrong or admit to lying, because if you can provide evidence to achieve the former, then the latter must be true.

dagilechia wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:40 i will watch it in slow motion because the punchstats seem wrong to me again

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:43

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:40
Irrelevant in relation to the outcome of the fight itself.

We should be talking about the fight itself and Canelo’s victory, since he stopped Kovalev.

None of Canelo’s detractors would have ever agreed with the judges scorecards, unless they’d awarded every single round to Kovalev.

Have you read some of the anti-Canelo remarks accusing Kovalev of fighting as if he’d been paid off, with the very same people also moaning about the corrupt scorecards?

What’s it to be, both accusations can be true can they?

If it rains in Las Vegas today, would that be Canelo’s fault also?

I know they not relevant. I only asked a question.

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:51

ewenhay wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:42

You never answered his question

What was your scorecard?

I'd imagine you had Alvarez well ahead.

You've always been biased against Golovkin and Kovalev.

I didn’t have Canelo well ahead.

I have never disliked GGG either. My comments have always related to my dislike of Sanchez, Loeffler, K2, his teams false claims, his illogical fans and also the calibre of opposition Gennadiy has faced.

My dislike of Krusher generally relate to his out of ring antics. And let’s face it, if you feel he doesn’t deserve to be criticised for some of the stuff he’s done, then you’re either an idiot or ignorant.

I have ALWAYS been complementary about the pugilistic skills and overall fighting ability of Krusher and GGG.

And it’ll be categorically impossible for you to prove otherwise, but I’d really love to see you try.

Come on kid, try to prove me wrong or admit to lying, because if you can provide evidence to achieve the former, then the latter must be true.

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:38

haben wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:34 There were 2 or 3 very close rounds, rounds 2 and 4 were hard to split, I had Kovalev winning round 2 and Canelo winning round 4 but it could've been anyone's.

There were rounds where Kovalev's punches bounced of gloves and his jabs were only touching but Canelo landed clean shots.

That is the type of fight you have to sit ringside to really see the clear pattern of the fight.

Were you sat ringside?

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 03:00 A gentle reminder everyone, Canelo WON by STOPPAGE.

Based on some of posts in this thread, it seems people forgot about that!

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:43

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:40
Irrelevant in relation to the outcome of the fight itself.

We should be talking about the fight itself and Canelo’s victory, since he stopped Kovalev.

None of Canelo’s detractors would have ever agreed with the judges scorecards, unless they’d awarded every single round to Kovalev.

Have you read some of the anti-Canelo remarks accusing Kovalev of fighting as if he’d been paid off, with the very same people also moaning about the corrupt scorecards?

What’s it to be, both accusations can be true can they?

If it rains in Las Vegas today, would that be Canelo’s fault also?

I know they not relevant. I only asked a question.

rikatron wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:56 I don't know if it's only me, but I have seen the ko many times and I don't see too much power on canelo's miraculous punch that put Kovalev so bad.

Deleted_Scenes wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 06:08

rikatron wrote: ↑03 Nov 2019, 02:56 I don't know if it's only me, but I have seen the ko many times and I don't see too much power on canelo's miraculous punch that put Kovalev so bad.

Kov was tired by then. Punch resistance is always lower when a fighter is tired. He was definitely hurt by it.