Re: MMA
Posted: 10 Jul 2017, 09:31
I'll take Whitaker by the same score.punchoutsb wrote:You know what, I'll go ahead and call it now since I don't mind potentially being wrong.
Bisping is going to beat Whittaker. 4-1 UD.
I'll take Whitaker by the same score.punchoutsb wrote:You know what, I'll go ahead and call it now since I don't mind potentially being wrong.
Bisping is going to beat Whittaker. 4-1 UD.
The GSP situation is strange.Jaywheel wrote:White lately said that GSP's ship has sailed regarding the Bisping fight.Impractical Poster wrote:If GSP fails miserably in his return bout at 170, where does that leave Bisping/GSP? Sure, they could fight, but it wouldn't do as good had Bisping been the first to get him. While I understand and give Michael props for what he did, as much as I can't stand the dude, he has paid his dues and deserves a big payday.p4p1 wrote: I do think he takes that fight as well.
MW is very interesting now though because while I think Whittaker will take out Bisping, Mousasi and Rockhold are probably stylistically probaly worst matchups.
Do we know for certain either fighter entered the cage at 100%? Sure we know Whittaker got injured but this is MMA, fighters are rarely at 100% entering the cage never mind leaving it. Anyway Romero is never going to win a 5 round decision without a 10-8 or 2. Whoever made the "best 3 round fighter" comment was right but he's really only a 2 round fighter.p4p1 wrote:I admit I get caught up in how athletic the guy is when he is fresh. He's using skills he started learning in his 30s which I think is just so impressive.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I didn't think yoel looked anything near amazing in the first two rounds. In fact, a healthy Whittaker likely shuts him out if he doesn't stop him.
I agree a healthy Whittaker probably would've stopped him as the fight went on. A lot of people seem to be underrating(not on here) what Rob was able to do though, now some are calling Romero a bum and even more outrageously some are saying he was robbed.
Deadendgeneration wrote:Do we know for certain either fighter entered the cage at 100%? Sure we know Whittaker got injured but this is MMA, fighters are rarely at 100% entering the cage never mind leaving it. Anyway Romero is never going to win a 5 round decision without a 10-8 or 2. Whoever made the "best 3 round fighter" comment was right but he's really only a 2 round fighter.p4p1 wrote:I admit I get caught up in how athletic the guy is when he is fresh. He's using skills he started learning in his 30s which I think is just so impressive.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I didn't think yoel looked anything near amazing in the first two rounds. In fact, a healthy Whittaker likely shuts him out if he doesn't stop him.
I agree a healthy Whittaker probably would've stopped him as the fight went on. A lot of people seem to be underrating(not on here) what Rob was able to do though, now some are calling Romero a bum and even more outrageously some are saying he was robbed.
I though the fight was pretty easy to judge and I'm pretty sure all of the judges had it exactly the same. Romero is what he is, he'd have either stopped Bisping in the first 2 or lost a decision. I'd always leaned towards the former but you never know with Bisping, his chin is average but his recuperative powers are very high.
Yeah I'm well aware that Bisping can punch, I had a few BJJ classes at the Wolfslair back in my summers away from uni and his power was spoken of though I never even saw him training. My assumption was the movement and thus lighter punching was because of his own deficiencies in the chin department and the fact that he could keep up that pace for 5 rounds. I think the issue with alternating is leaving himself vulnerable.Tomasino wrote:Deadendgeneration wrote:Do we know for certain either fighter entered the cage at 100%? Sure we know Whittaker got injured but this is MMA, fighters are rarely at 100% entering the cage never mind leaving it. Anyway Romero is never going to win a 5 round decision without a 10-8 or 2. Whoever made the "best 3 round fighter" comment was right but he's really only a 2 round fighter.p4p1 wrote: I admit I get caught up in how athletic the guy is when he is fresh. He's using skills he started learning in his 30s which I think is just so impressive.
I agree a healthy Whittaker probably would've stopped him as the fight went on. A lot of people seem to be underrating(not on here) what Rob was able to do though, now some are calling Romero a bum and even more outrageously some are saying he was robbed.
I though the fight was pretty easy to judge and I'm pretty sure all of the judges had it exactly the same. Romero is what he is, he'd have either stopped Bisping in the first 2 or lost a decision. I'd always leaned towards the former but you never know with Bisping, his chin is average but his recuperative powers are very high.
He's also mega active. Bisping was thought of as a huge puncher before the UFC. He trained himself to be a volume striker after TUF and this contributed to his losses. In the Rockhokd fight he digs his toes in and nails Luke and finished him with hard punches. If he could alternate between the two styles in a fight he'd do better. Dan Henderson is his bogey man.
Deadendgeneration wrote:Yeah I'm well aware that Bisping can punch, I had a few BJJ classes at the Wolfslair back in my summers away from uni and his power was spoken of though I never even saw him training. My assumption was the movement and thus lighter punching was because of his own deficiencies in the chin department and the fact that he could keep up that pace for 5 rounds. I think the issue with alternating is leaving himself vulnerable.Tomasino wrote:Deadendgeneration wrote:
Do we know for certain either fighter entered the cage at 100%? Sure we know Whittaker got injured but this is MMA, fighters are rarely at 100% entering the cage never mind leaving it. Anyway Romero is never going to win a 5 round decision without a 10-8 or 2. Whoever made the "best 3 round fighter" comment was right but he's really only a 2 round fighter.
I though the fight was pretty easy to judge and I'm pretty sure all of the judges had it exactly the same. Romero is what he is, he'd have either stopped Bisping in the first 2 or lost a decision. I'd always leaned towards the former but you never know with Bisping, his chin is average but his recuperative powers are very high.
He's also mega active. Bisping was thought of as a huge puncher before the UFC. He trained himself to be a volume striker after TUF and this contributed to his losses. In the Rockhokd fight he digs his toes in and nails Luke and finished him with hard punches. If he could alternate between the two styles in a fight he'd do better. Dan Henderson is his bogey man.
Physically or as a place to train? It's in my hometown so the former was easy enough. In terms of the latter I didn't enjoy it so much. I was a white belt with about a years experience of training at Gracie Barra in Sheffield at the time. I don't know if this is how the dynamic works with BJJ and MMA but even drilling would go off script with guy trying to put up excessive resistance, counters or reversals whilst I was there. Whilst rolling powering out of position rather than using technique was the go to. But as I said, I only went to a few classes, and at a time when the head BJJ trainer was away so maybe I'm not the best judge.Tomasino wrote:Deadendgeneration wrote:Yeah I'm well aware that Bisping can punch, I had a few BJJ classes at the Wolfslair back in my summers away from uni and his power was spoken of though I never even saw him training. My assumption was the movement and thus lighter punching was because of his own deficiencies in the chin department and the fact that he could keep up that pace for 5 rounds. I think the issue with alternating is leaving himself vulnerable.Tomasino wrote:
He's also mega active. Bisping was thought of as a huge puncher before the UFC. He trained himself to be a volume striker after TUF and this contributed to his losses. In the Rockhokd fight he digs his toes in and nails Luke and finished him with hard punches. If he could alternate between the two styles in a fight he'd do better. Dan Henderson is his bogey man.
True. How did you find the wolfslair?
Deadendgeneration wrote:Physically or as a place to train? It's in my hometown so the former was easy enough. In terms of the latter I didn't enjoy it so much. I was a white belt with about a years experience of training at Gracie Barra in Sheffield at the time. I don't know if this is how the dynamic works with BJJ and MMA but even drilling would go off script with guy trying to put up excessive resistance, counters or reversals whilst I was there. Whilst rolling powering out of position rather than using technique was the go to. But as I said, I only went to a few classes, and at a time when the head BJJ trainer was away so maybe I'm not the best judge.Tomasino wrote:Deadendgeneration wrote:
Yeah I'm well aware that Bisping can punch, I had a few BJJ classes at the Wolfslair back in my summers away from uni and his power was spoken of though I never even saw him training. My assumption was the movement and thus lighter punching was because of his own deficiencies in the chin department and the fact that he could keep up that pace for 5 rounds. I think the issue with alternating is leaving himself vulnerable.
True. How did you find the wolfslair?
I don't see it happening. As you Tony deserves the fight, I'd be happy for Khabib to get it though. It'll probably be Diaz if he fights in the UFC again.Impractical Poster wrote:Conor is already talking about fighting Khabib in Russia. Seems odd to talk of that now. And Khabib is a strange pick seeing as how he has been having weight issues. Tony should get the fight. But, I'll take Khabib.