Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4733
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Horse wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote:As close as it was and with 2 points off can anyone honestly say Burns deserved anything other than a loss?
Yes.
Elaborate.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by Horse »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:Elaborate.
I scored it for Burns, so I obviously disagree. Others did the same.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4733
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Horse wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote:Elaborate.
I scored it for Burns, so I obviously disagree. Others did the same.
So you had Burns by how many?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by Horse »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:So you had Burns by how many?
115-113 Burns
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by crusader »

Haven't seen the fight but Laurence Cole is one of the worst high-profile refs in the sport,.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23014
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by handsofstone »

I scored it 114-113 Figueroa, It was a hard fight to watch with all the spoiling and that ref shouldn't be allowed near a ring again,I was hoping he'd take a point of Burns earlier just so Ricky would stick to boxing as he was clearly a better technician than Omar but Burns stooped to his level I thought and he was the worst offender although both were at it,effing pulling arms from the ref,great to see Burns perform again though

Great to see Eggington win the Commonwealth too,Lampey was piss poor but Sam looked good for the most part but the ref stepped in a touch early

Joshua,Campbell,Smith,Macklin and Yafai fights were what they were :wink:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by palooka »

The ref had his eyes on Burns all night, it was a crude battle and both were guilty of infringements, I felt the ref took the second point to 'make sure'. I thought Ricky was well in it, the cards were a joke but the fight itself showed Ricky still has a career at high level, he'll be stronger next time out. Omar Fig will get caught out, he trades on hiis youth and vitality and though he's very tough Crawford would demolish him.

Well done Ricky, a long way from home, he's got bottle alright.
Andrew
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by Andrew »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:
brilo33 wrote:it wasn't day light robbery just the way the scoring goes. but you could of scored burns to win that fight ,and i don't think figueroa could of moaned. i thought figueroa nicked it due to the points deductions
As close as it was and with 2 points off can anyone honestly say Burns deserved anything other than a loss?

Figueroas been exposed as a fat no use bastard tonight to a degree. Is he honestly going upto welter? Oh dear.
Figueroa would get smashed at welterweight by the likes of Porter Thurman Maidana IMO
zero
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 439
Joined: 16 Aug 2011, 16:30

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by zero »

palooka wrote:The ref had his eyes on Burns all night, it was a crude battle and both were guilty of infringements, I felt the ref took the second point to 'make sure'. I thought Ricky was well in it, the cards were a joke but the fight itself showed Ricky still has a career at high level, he'll be stronger next time out. Omar Fig will get caught out, he trades on hiis youth and vitality and though he's very tough Crawford would demolish him.

Well done Ricky, a long way from home, he's got bottle alright.
You hit the nail on the head the second point deduction was just making sure IMO.

Ricky Burns deserves massive plaudits for last night he was fighting a crude overweight junior welter who seemed to just bore in with his head. When Burns managed to box behind the jab he looked good, lateral movement is required when being pushed back from Burns, he just uses unnecessary energy constantly fighting on ropes and he doesn't have the power or skills to do it effectively.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by ALI »

zero wrote:
palooka wrote:The ref had his eyes on Burns all night, it was a crude battle and both were guilty of infringements, I felt the ref took the second point to 'make sure'. I thought Ricky was well in it, the cards were a joke but the fight itself showed Ricky still has a career at high level, he'll be stronger next time out. Omar Fig will get caught out, he trades on hiis youth and vitality and though he's very tough Crawford would demolish him.

Well done Ricky, a long way from home, he's got bottle alright.
You hit the nail on the head the second point deduction was just making sure IMO
Agreed, the question is, who bought/influenced the ref?

His bias was so blatant he should never be allowed near a boxing ring ever again. My guess is he will walk away scot free and soon be in a position to do the same all over again to some other poor guy fighting his heart out.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32679
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Must admit I've lost track of what fights we're supposed to be discussing on this thread, but Canelo v Kirkland was effing awesome! Surprised so many Yanks rate Kirkland highly, he's clearly incredibly chinny & has terrible defence so was always likely to be ko'd early against an accurate opponent like Alvarez, but was really entertaining whilst it lasted.
zero
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 439
Joined: 16 Aug 2011, 16:30

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by zero »

@ ALI

Laurence Cole has his on thread on the current scene.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4733
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Boxerbeetle wrote:Must admit I've lost track of what fights we're supposed to be discussing on this thread, but Canelo v Kirkland was effing awesome! Surprised so many Yanks rate Kirkland highly, he's clearly incredibly chinny & has terrible defence so was always likely to be ko'd early against an accurate opponent like Alvarez, but was really entertaining whilst it lasted.
It certainly was. Kirkland was absolutely made for Alvarez and the finish was devastating.

He's never in many dull fights Alvarez hopefully the Cotto fight comes off.
Emmseegee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1400
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 10:29

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by Emmseegee »

Alvarez looked great last night. The two styles gelled to make Alvarez look at his best and that counter uppercut was as good a punch as you will see. :box:
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by Finn »

The burns fight was a hard one to call I had a similar card and the same score as Jim watts which I believe was burns losing by two.

The ref was shocking. The rounds were so scrappy but when I heard the results I though "home town scoring" but it was irrelevant because I thought burns was just edged out.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by palooka »

It maybe was irrelevant Finn as Omar was very energetic but each judge must have given Figueroa every close round, - Burns was railroaded in a close fight and the ref was a cheat.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by Finn »

palooka wrote:It maybe was irrelevant Finn as Omar was very energetic but each judge must have given Figueroa every close round, - Burns was railroaded in a close fight and the ref was a cheat.
I agree but in terms of his career prospects.... He won big last night.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by palooka »

Finn wrote:
palooka wrote:It maybe was irrelevant Finn as Omar was very energetic but each judge must have given Figueroa every close round, - Burns was railroaded in a close fight and the ref was a cheat.
I agree but in terms of his career prospects.... He won big last night.
I was really pleased with how resilient Ricky was and he certainly showed he has a few good fights on him yet. Crawford is another level and Beltran looked destructive last week, Ricky is in the mix and belongs among the top fighters.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23014
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by handsofstone »

palooka wrote:
Finn wrote:
palooka wrote:It maybe was irrelevant Finn as Omar was very energetic but each judge must have given Figueroa every close round, - Burns was railroaded in a close fight and the ref was a cheat.
I agree but in terms of his career prospects.... He won big last night.
I was really pleased with how resilient Ricky was and he certainly showed he has a few good fights on him yet. Crawford is another level and Beltran looked destructive last week, Ricky is in the mix and belongs among the top fighters.
In the scheme of things it looks as if Burns actually did well against Crawford
GreenLightning
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 915
Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 15:23

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by GreenLightning »

ThereByTheGrace wrote: He has had a fair few home decisions in the past .
One draw....what are these other home town decisions ricky has had?
Emmseegee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1400
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 10:29

Re: Birmingham and Texas discussion thread

Post by Emmseegee »

I think a lot of people seem to have Gonzalez quitting on his stool in their mind as if it wasn't a merited victory.
Beltran however was robbed.
Post Reply