BoxRec

mickey1975 wrote:

dirk2686 wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:That's bullshit. It's two years ago and Tyson has won the world title since. They've obviously got no case. Strangest carry on ever if they have.

The biggest issue with this whole case has been the notion that authorities were aware of a potential drug test fail prior to a fight. Worst case scenario and Klitschko ended up with permanent damage in the aftermath of a fight with a drug-fuelled Fury. What the hell happens then?

Will be good to get some clarity out of the whole thing but I imagine the case may be that there were major failings in the testing process which allowed a drugged individual into a fight.

They need sacking if he was guilty, useless.

mickey1975 wrote:

dirk2686 wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:That's bullshit. It's two years ago and Tyson has won the world title since. They've obviously got no case. Strangest carry on ever if they have.

The biggest issue with this whole case has been the notion that authorities were aware of a potential drug test fail prior to a fight. Worst case scenario and Klitschko ended up with permanent damage in the aftermath of a fight with a drug-fuelled Fury. What the hell happens then?

Will be good to get some clarity out of the whole thing but I imagine the case may be that there were major failings in the testing process which allowed a drugged individual into a fight.

They need sacking if he was guilty, useless.

dalcumly wrote:When all of this was going on Tyson Fury was a licensed boxer with the BBB of C. Given the concern in all sports about the misuse of drugs, particularly in a combat sport, I think the Board need to conduct a detailed investigation and once that's complete all those license holders involved need to be called to the Board and asked for their account of what took place.
I wouldn't pre-judge the outcome, but all those involved in professional boxing need to know the facts, and to see what action, if any, the Board is prepared to take. It might well be that the Board decide that UKAD is not an organisation the wish to be involved with in the future, or Tyson Fury and others need some sort of punishment.

Naandrew wrote:So according to the mirror. The 3 day UKAD hearing for Tyson Fury (and propbably Hughie though he wasn't mentioned in the article ) finished today.

Wonder when the case file goes on the site.

bripez wrote:

Naandrew wrote:So according to the mirror. The 3 day UKAD hearing for Tyson Fury (and propbably Hughie though he wasn't mentioned in the article ) finished today.

Wonder when the case file goes on the site.

Any news yet ?

Anything on the various Fury Twitter accounts ?

Naandrew wrote:Yet even more questions

After the mirror said the hearing was 6th Feb

Now it is April according the the mail. If Hughie signed the contract earlier it would have happened within 12 months of his last fight. Now because the fight looks set for May 6th one years and one week after his previous fight.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/articl ... April.html

BitPlayer wrote:

Naandrew wrote:Yet even more questions

After the mirror said the hearing was 6th Feb

Now it is April according the the mail. If Hughie signed the contract earlier it would have happened within 12 months of his last fight. Now because the fight looks set for May 6th one years and one week after his previous fight.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/articl ... April.html

How the hell hasn't this all been settled by now?

It's from 2 years ago.

Boxerbeetle wrote:

BitPlayer wrote:

Naandrew wrote:Yet even more questions

After the mirror said the hearing was 6th Feb

Now it is April according the the mail. If Hughie signed the contract earlier it would have happened within 12 months of his last fight. Now because the fight looks set for May 6th one years and one week after his previous fight.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-4265138/JEFF-POWELL-Hughie-Fury-doping-hearing-set-mid-April.html

How the hell hasn't this all been settled by now?

It's from 2 years ago.

God knows. But they clearly don't have a case.

coneye wrote:Are the pimples clearing up , Get caught , stop using ,pimples clear , just saying

Naandrew wrote:

coneye wrote:Are the pimples clearing up , Get caught , stop using ,pimples clear , just saying

And Tyson Fury goes out of boxing in his own accord instead of being driven out by a drug ban which could be lengthy.

1) Nandrolone by UKAD 2) Cocaine by VADA and 3) ( only reports in papers ) refusing to do a drugs test.,

Only 1) applies to Hughie as well.

bripez wrote:

Naandrew wrote:

coneye wrote:Are the pimples clearing up , Get caught , stop using ,pimples clear , just saying

And Tyson Fury goes out of boxing in his own accord instead of being driven out by a drug ban which could be lengthy.

1) Nandrolone by UKAD 2) Cocaine by VADA and 3) ( only reports in papers ) refusing to do a drugs test.,

Only 1) applies to Hughie as well.

Yeah, Tyson spends his life getting to the pinnacle of his sport.

Then, when he is champion (and due champions purses - proper dough, the likes so that his kids and grandkids etc. would never have to worry about money) he decides to jib and spend his time at festivals and Anglesey kebab shops! - makes sense .....

magwitch wrote:

bripez wrote:

Naandrew wrote:
And Tyson Fury goes out of boxing in his own accord instead of being driven out by a drug ban which could be lengthy.

1) Nandrolone by UKAD 2) Cocaine by VADA and 3) ( only reports in papers ) refusing to do a drugs test.,

Only 1) applies to Hughie as well.

Yeah, Tyson spends his life getting to the pinnacle of his sport.

Then, when he is champion (and due champions purses - proper dough, the likes so that his kids and grandkids etc. would never have to worry about money) he decides to jib and spend his time at festivals and Anglesey kebab shops! - makes sense .....

That isn’t proof of any wrongdoing though is it

bripez wrote:

magwitch wrote:

bripez wrote:
Yeah, Tyson spends his life getting to the pinnacle of his sport.

Then, when he is champion (and due champions purses - proper dough, the likes so that his kids and grandkids etc. would never have to worry about money) he decides to jib and spend his time at festivals and Anglesey kebab shops! - makes sense .....

That isn’t proof of any wrongdoing though is it

In isolation of course not (although the several failed samples would suggest otherwise).

He has spent years earning grands / hundreds of grands and he is now at a stage where he can fight beatable opponents 3 times a year for £millions a fight.

tobyh5 wrote:

bripez wrote:

magwitch wrote:
That isn’t proof of any wrongdoing though is it

In isolation of course not (although the several failed samples would suggest otherwise).

He has spent years earning grands / hundreds of grands and he is now at a stage where he can fight beatable opponents 3 times a year for £millions a fight.

He is at the stage where he can have one single fight, not bother to train, lose and walk away with millions. Does not add up does it

magwitch wrote:

tobyh5 wrote:

bripez wrote:
In isolation of course not (although the several failed samples would suggest otherwise).

He has spent years earning grands / hundreds of grands and he is now at a stage where he can fight beatable opponents 3 times a year for £millions a fight.

He is at the stage where he can have one single fight, not bother to train, lose and walk away with millions. Does not add up does it

I get the theory....but do many fighters go for that? I can’t see Fury going out on his kebab like a fat has-been, can you?

Rob3_142 wrote:How much did he pick up for the Klitschko fight? Must have been round 25% of the purse? Surely that's gotta start running dry soon? Sounds like he's burning through it with some of his antics.

mickey1975 wrote:

Rob3_142 wrote:How much did he pick up for the Klitschko fight? Must have been round 25% of the purse? Surely that's gotta start running dry soon? Sounds like he's burning through it with some of his antics.

What? Eating kebabs? A blow out on sniff? I know loads who've done more on the dole. Throw in the money he had anyway and the odd £7,000 a night dinners he does and he'll be fine.

All parties are currently awaiting a ruling from the NADP tribunal on an application made by the athletes to exclude certain evidence. Once that ruling is received, the matter will proceed to a hearing on the merits. UK Anti-Doping is currently pushing for dates to be fixed for that