BoxRec

WelshJack wrote:A lumping bet this weekend seems to be:
Beltran 8/15
Skeete 1/20
Buglioni 1/12
Chambers 1/6
Fury 1/25
Lee 1/33
Monaghan 1/25

1.27/1

reggaereggae wrote:

WelshJack wrote:A lumping bet this weekend seems to be:
Beltran 8/15
Skeete 1/20
Buglioni 1/12
Chambers 1/6
Fury 1/25
Lee 1/33
Monaghan 1/25

1.27/1

one of thse guys will lose is what I think

BOYOVERTHEHILL wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:

WelshJack wrote:A lumping bet this weekend seems to be:
Beltran 8/15
Skeete 1/20
Buglioni 1/12
Chambers 1/6
Fury 1/25
Lee 1/33
Monaghan 1/25

1.27/1

one of thse guys will lose is what I think

Who do you think has the slippiest banana skin reggae reggae!?

reggaereggae wrote:

BOYOVERTHEHILL wrote:

reggaereggae wrote: one of thse guys will lose is what I think

Who do you think has the slippiest banana skin reggae reggae!?

good question - Buglioni or Beltran?

Boxing Prospect wrote:Usmanee is a real handful and very very under-rated. Wonder if he had something in the pipe line before he stepped in...if he did that could be very interesting.

reggaereggae wrote:OK I may be losing my objectivity after recent successes... but I put a small bet on each of Khometsy (at 9-1; though now 11-2), Pala over Price at 20-1 (now 11-1) and a double Pac Pts/Maywether Pts (3-1- a medium bet).

I would say Ovill is worth a bet but cant find a price on the KO
Do you khomitsky getting a stoppage or outworking Buglioni and nicking the points???

Let's see warriors :-)

GlobalBox wrote:Strange to have backed a person I think will lose but have had to back Mckenzie Rounds 1,2 and 3 against Conquest with PP 55,50,40, just seem way to big

There are 18s about for those three which is the right call as you cant go too low obviously or it will mess up what you do for the other rounds but they are just too big

Sometimes you just have to give the bookie your money when you think it will probably lose because the prices make you, however sometimes it just comes back.

My most famous two like this were Rahman/Lewis 1 , I backed Hasim in rounds 1-6 all at 100 even though I thought Lennox would win and indeed desperately wanted him to, just thought the prices were crazy what with Lennox playing his role in Oceans 11 etc. Also backed Sanders against Wlad at 125/1 rounds 1,2 and 3.

Only had a fiver on each of the rounds but it was tidy pick up, there have been many times the prices have been wrong since and had the odd little tickle but thought I would try my luck tonight
Fancy Conquest 2nd half of the fight around 8-10, but although would not have backed McKenzie rounds at 20s as that would be reasonable this seems big.

Riddick Blowe wrote:

GlobalBox wrote:Strange to have backed a person I think will lose but have had to back Mckenzie Rounds 1,2 and 3 against Conquest with PP 55,50,40, just seem way to big

There are 18s about for those three which is the right call as you cant go too low obviously or it will mess up what you do for the other rounds but they are just too big

Sometimes you just have to give the bookie your money when you think it will probably lose because the prices make you, however sometimes it just comes back.

My most famous two like this were Rahman/Lewis 1 , I backed Hasim in rounds 1-6 all at 100 even though I thought Lennox would win and indeed desperately wanted him to, just thought the prices were crazy what with Lennox playing his role in Oceans 11 etc. Also backed Sanders against Wlad at 125/1 rounds 1,2 and 3.

Only had a fiver on each of the rounds but it was tidy pick up, there have been many times the prices have been wrong since and had the odd little tickle but thought I would try my luck tonight
Fancy Conquest 2nd half of the fight around 8-10, but although would not have backed McKenzie rounds at 20s as that would be reasonable this seems big.

Good post. So often people forget betting is about finding value. Crucially this doesn't necessarily mean you're backing the result you think will happen but rather the result that has a better chance of happening than the bookies are giving it.

Riddick Blowe wrote:

GlobalBox wrote:Strange to have backed a person I think will lose but have had to back Mckenzie Rounds 1,2 and 3 against Conquest with PP 55,50,40, just seem way to big

There are 18s about for those three which is the right call as you cant go too low obviously or it will mess up what you do for the other rounds but they are just too big

Sometimes you just have to give the bookie your money when you think it will probably lose because the prices make you, however sometimes it just comes back.

My most famous two like this were Rahman/Lewis 1 , I backed Hasim in rounds 1-6 all at 100 even though I thought Lennox would win and indeed desperately wanted him to, just thought the prices were crazy what with Lennox playing his role in Oceans 11 etc. Also backed Sanders against Wlad at 125/1 rounds 1,2 and 3.

Only had a fiver on each of the rounds but it was tidy pick up, there have been many times the prices have been wrong since and had the odd little tickle but thought I would try my luck tonight
Fancy Conquest 2nd half of the fight around 8-10, but although would not have backed McKenzie rounds at 20s as that would be reasonable this seems big.

Good post. So often people forget betting is about finding value. Crucially this doesn't necessarily mean you're backing the result you think will happen but rather the result that has a better chance of happening than the bookies are giving it.

GlobalBox wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:

GlobalBox wrote:Strange to have backed a person I think will lose but have had to back Mckenzie Rounds 1,2 and 3 against Conquest with PP 55,50,40, just seem way to big

There are 18s about for those three which is the right call as you cant go too low obviously or it will mess up what you do for the other rounds but they are just too big

Sometimes you just have to give the bookie your money when you think it will probably lose because the prices make you, however sometimes it just comes back.

My most famous two like this were Rahman/Lewis 1 , I backed Hasim in rounds 1-6 all at 100 even though I thought Lennox would win and indeed desperately wanted him to, just thought the prices were crazy what with Lennox playing his role in Oceans 11 etc. Also backed Sanders against Wlad at 125/1 rounds 1,2 and 3.

Only had a fiver on each of the rounds but it was tidy pick up, there have been many times the prices have been wrong since and had the odd little tickle but thought I would try my luck tonight
Fancy Conquest 2nd half of the fight around 8-10, but although would not have backed McKenzie rounds at 20s as that would be reasonable this seems big.

Good post. So often people forget betting is about finding value. Crucially this doesn't necessarily mean you're backing the result you think will happen but rather the result that has a better chance of happening than the bookies are giving it.

Betvictor just gone up 80s round 1 McKenzie so had to have a go at that as well

ShadrachSimmo wrote:

GlobalBox wrote:

Riddick Blowe wrote:
Betvictor just gone up 80s round 1 McKenzie so had to have a go at that as well

Always worth a few quid ovil first few rounds.

reggaereggae wrote:PS Andy Lee - Horta... has this happened? Boxrec reports a MD for Lee yet I managed to place a couple of bets after I'd seen this?

Einherjar wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:PS Andy Lee - Horta... has this happened? Boxrec reports a MD for Lee yet I managed to place a couple of bets after I'd seen this?

Yeah it finished about 45 minutes ago.