Re: Broner/Malignaggi and undercard RBR.
Posted: 22 Jun 2013, 23:19
Boring fight = more time to bitch about itBlodhemn wrote:How is this topic 15 pages long? You guys love shitty fights.
Boring fight = more time to bitch about itBlodhemn wrote:How is this topic 15 pages long? You guys love shitty fights.
Banks has a history of those types of performances. He's generally a lazy fighter and he has poor stamina, which leads to very lackluster showings.columbo wrote:Anyone think banks might of thrown that?
impossible to prove something like that unless they come out and say they did it.dookus wrote:In the absence of proof...columbo wrote:Anyone think banks might of thrown that?
Good characterization.Horse wrote:Banks was pathetic.
maybe it was just that to be fair.crusader wrote:Banks has a history of those types of performances. He's generally a lazy fighter and he has poor stamina, which leads to very lackluster showings.columbo wrote:Anyone think banks might of thrown that?
Maybe he just gassed.columbo wrote:this fight looks suspicious to me almost like banks wanted to lose when he could clearly win
CrazyHorse wrote:Could you have possibly awarded a winner of the fight? I honestly thought they were going to announce that both fighters lost. First time in history that it would happen. I honestly thought they would do that
Mitchell deserved it; it's about who does more than the other, even if neither did much.CrazyHorse wrote:Could you have possibly awarded a winner of the fight? I honestly thought they were going to announce that both fighters lost. First time in history that it would happen. I honestly thought they would do that
x3DetroitHxC wrote:SouthpawStephen wrote:Jennings would own these guys.
True I guess, somewhat. This rapper sucks dick.dookus wrote:Boring fight = more time to bitch about itBlodhemn wrote:How is this topic 15 pages long? You guys love shitty fights.
That fight damn near killed the sport of boxingcrusader wrote:Mitchell deserved it; it's about who does more than the other, even if neither did much.CrazyHorse wrote:Could you have possibly awarded a winner of the fight? I honestly thought they were going to announce that both fighters lost. First time in history that it would happen. I honestly thought they would do that
Gimme a x4.Rover wrote:x3DetroitHxC wrote:SouthpawStephen wrote:Jennings would own these guys.
How sad.victor-romeo wrote:seth is a champ...
Until I see evidence, no.columbo wrote:Anyone think banks might of thrown that?
Thats who i was talking about!Baby Face Finster wrote:Isn't that Chuck Zito behind Paulie?