Re: Round-By-Round - Gervonta Davis (c) vs. Liam Walsh - May 20th 2017
Posted: 20 May 2017, 18:05
rossij8 wrote:Always, and still has a better barnettIT wrote:On a side note- Dempsey is vastly superior to Adam Smith!
rossij8 wrote:Always, and still has a better barnettIT wrote:On a side note- Dempsey is vastly superior to Adam Smith!
True, but his pout is not as good.....rossij8 wrote:Always, and still has a better barnettIT wrote:On a side note- Dempsey is vastly superior to Adam Smith!
I agree mate, I don't dislike him he knows his stuff but I much prefer JonesIT wrote:I know im in the minority here but I find Woodhall's commentary very dull. He's knowledgeable but bland. Prefer Malignaggi.
It was Davis being that good , leagues above Walsh , expected a much closer fight myself .forcefraser wrote:Not sure whether that was Davis being that good or Walsh being that bad. Walsh looked totally out of his depth. He did nothing at all. looked like the ref got in the way when Walsh to a big punch on the ropes, leave them alone and let them fight.
Stoppage could be called ever so slightly premature, it is a world title fight after all, but it was going to end only one way so fair enough really.
Gutted over Walsh`s performance, he was terrible.
this ^ scary speed and accurate.immediate step to the side when he had walsh in trouble so walsh was covering up for punches coming from straight in front of him. i thought his height might be an issue when he moves up in weight,now i don't think it will be a problem . going to take someone with incredible speed and movement to give him major trouble.Loftgroov wrote:The power is one thing, but Tank's speed was something else.
Looks a fighter of the highest caliber.
Yeah I forgot about Jones aswell. I also enjoy Jones. Knows his stuff aswell but also has personality.handsofstone wrote:I agree mate, I don't dislike him he knows his stuff but I much prefer JonesIT wrote:I know im in the minority here but I find Woodhall's commentary very dull. He's knowledgeable but bland. Prefer Malignaggi.
I agree. I think Davis made him look worse than he actually is.world ranked wrote:Walsh was in there with a world class guy no shame. He can still come back. Unlucky to get Davis.
I like both a lot- BT / BN switching between the two - qualityhandsofstone wrote:I agree mate, I don't dislike him he knows his stuff but I much prefer JonesIT wrote:I know im in the minority here but I find Woodhall's commentary very dull. He's knowledgeable but bland. Prefer Malignaggi.
Davis being that good shouldn't have stopped Walsh actually trying to defend himself though. Instead he just kept his hands down by his side even when he was getting battered. Very disappointing performance.rd350lc wrote:It was Davis being that good , leagues above Walsh , expected a much closer fight myself .forcefraser wrote:Not sure whether that was Davis being that good or Walsh being that bad. Walsh looked totally out of his depth. He did nothing at all. looked like the ref got in the way when Walsh to a big punch on the ropes, leave them alone and let them fight.
Stoppage could be called ever so slightly premature, it is a world title fight after all, but it was going to end only one way so fair enough really.
Gutted over Walsh`s performance, he was terrible.
Lomachencko?rab wrote:this ^ scary speed and accurate.immediate step to the side when he had walsh in trouble so walsh was covering up for punches coming from straight in front of him. i thought his height might be an issue when he moves up in weight,now i don't think it will be a problem . going to take someone with incredible speed and movement to give him major trouble.Loftgroov wrote:The power is one thing, but Tank's speed was something else.
Looks a fighter of the highest caliber.
Me too, but sometimes you have to roll the dice. He won`t keep that speed for too long. A lot of people think Tyson was at his peak at 21, this kid could the same.IT wrote:I'd pick Lomachenko to beat Davis but I think Davis himself recognises that he's not ready for Lomachenko yet.
Yeah, i see your point. Its a tough one.forcefraser wrote:Me too, but sometimes you have to roll the dice. He won`t keep that speed for too long. A lot of people think Tyson was at his peak at 21, this kid could the same.IT wrote:I'd pick Lomachenko to beat Davis but I think Davis himself recognises that he's not ready for Lomachenko yet.
He is listed as having a very long reach and looking at him he does indeed appear to have long arms so I think his listed reach is geniune.crusader wrote:It will be interesting to see how long he stays at 130. Only 22, and already needed three attempts at making weight. I suppose it could've just been a miscalculation on his end though..
The guys at 135 are significantly taller, although he's got the type of speed to mitigate that.
bellends like that need banning tbh, must be loads of camera footage that obviously won't be utilised as its boxing so they think its ok. stuff like that really puts me off taking my sons to live shows and its all lard arses with beer inside them that wouldn't put up when soberrd350lc wrote:You will never see him again on these shores again after the way the muppets in the crowd acted tonight .Naandrew wrote:I'm all for thatIT wrote:Hearn should bring Davis back to the uk. Would be fun to see Smith bashed up
I dont like either of them as commentators, their accents grind badly on tv and they seem too loathe to call things out because they are ex-fighters who dont want to upset people in the game. Prefer journalistic types who dont care who they upset like Bunce, Darke, Dempsey etc . . . . . I dont get this theory that you need an ex pro to call the action, give me a lifelong fan of the sport who doesnt give a monkeys who gets upset about his opinion.IT wrote:I know im in the minority here but I find Woodhall's commentary very dull. He's knowledgeable but bland. Prefer Malignaggi.
It pisses me off too.Jackson328 wrote:bellends like that need banning tbh, must be loads of camera footage that obviously won't be utilised as its boxing so they think its ok. stuff like that really puts me off taking my sons to live shows and its all lard arses with beer inside them that wouldn't put up when soberrd350lc wrote:You will never see him again on these shores again after the way the muppets in the crowd acted tonight .Naandrew wrote:
I'm all for that