BoxRec

Spud MK2 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 12:45 Where on earth is John “The Agenda” manchester ??

Come on you spineless rat … show yourself give
the forum your real name you coward?

you have absolutely zero boxing knowledge
and come across as a failed lawyer

You seem extremely agitated. What are you so angry about?

johnmanchester wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 12:50

Spud MK2 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 12:45 Where on earth is John “The Agenda” manchester ??Come on you spineless rat … show yourself give
the forum your real name you coward?

you have absolutely zero boxing knowledge
and come across as a failed lawyer

You seem extremely agitated. What are you so angry abou

trust me i am having fun now stop
swerving my question

You have gone quiet ..

Spud MK2 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 13:01

johnmanchester wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 12:50

Spud MK2 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 12:45 Where on earth is John “The Agenda” manchester ??Come on you spineless rat … show yourself give
the forum your real name you coward?

you have absolutely zero boxing knowledge
and come across as a failed lawyer

You seem extremely agitated. What are you so angry abou

trust me i am having fun now stop
swerving my question

What was your question?


Edit: oh my name? Sure. Here's my LinkedIn if you want that.

Spud MK2 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 12:45 Where on earth is John “The Agenda” manchester ??

Come on you spineless rat … show yourself give
the forum your real name you coward?

you have absolutely zero boxing knowledge
and come across as a failed lawyer

This is a boxing forum there’s no need to call someone you don’t know a spineless rat, come on. Life is far too short for name calling on a forum.

Spud mate. Please don’t repeat this pattern.

Frostieballs wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 15:38 Spud mate. Please don’t repeat this pattern.

Just had a read through some of this and in a completely unbiased way, there's a few pretty pathetic and unnecessary messages from him on this thread. No need for most of it, even if he has a point or opinion to make on Shalom.

ok

SeanBrennan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 15:06

Spud MK2 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 12:45 Where on earth is John “The Agenda” manchester ??

Come on you spineless rat … show yourself give
the forum your real name you coward?

you have absolutely zero boxing knowledge
and come across as a failed lawyer

This is a boxing forum there’s no need to call someone you don’t know a spineless rat, come on. Life is far too short for name calling on a forum.

Spot on Sean

I’ve seen Hearn sticking the boot in to Shalom recently about the Sky deal. To compare the two situations is ludicrous & any reporter should be pulling him up on it.

Imagine Hearn coming into boxing & getting the Sky deal whilst there were two other promoters with most of the sports top fighters signed up being bankrolled by a company like Dazn losing hundreds of millions every year. Hearn wouldn't have coped.

Let’s not forget that Hearn & Warren were losing fighters to Daniel Kinahan who didn’t even have a tv deal. Olympians like the McCormack’s were rejecting Hearn & Warren to fight on MTK shows.

Fighters go where the money is, always have & always will. He might like to pretend he got where he did because he’s an incredible promoter & has the gift of the gab but that’s only a tiny fraction of it.

He was very fortunate that his only competition was allegedly for a long time & he had his pick of all the top fighters.

Let’s not forget either that he didn’t make Brook - Khan, Joshua against either Fury or Wilder, Crolla against Flanagan, he didn’t get any of Barker, Macklin, Murray & Lee in the ring together.

His legacy is not giving us the biggest fights that we wanted & supporting doping in boxing.

SeanBrennan wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 15:06

Spud MK2 wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 12:45 Where on earth is John “The Agenda” manchester ??

Come on you spineless rat … show yourself give
the forum your real name you coward?

you have absolutely zero boxing knowledge
and come across as a failed lawyer

This is a boxing forum there’s no need to call someone you don’t know a spineless rat, come on. Life is far too short for name calling on a forum.

i truly cannot believe you cannot see Johnmanchester has a very clear agenda.

click on his name and then click on previous posts.
the evidence smacks you in the mouth.

you then click on the Adam Smith and read some of the very strong comments concerning Adams battle against cancer.

yet i am pulled for a spinless rat comment
???

Spud MK2 wrote: ↑09 Dec 2025, 07:02 i truly cannot believe you cannot see Johnmanchester has a very clear agenda.

click on his name and then click on previous posts.
the evidence smacks you in the mouth.

you then click on the Adam Smith and read some of the very strong comments concerning Adams battle against cancer.

yet i am pulled for a spinless rat comment
???

Can you please shut the f*** up about Adam Smith having cancer for some pity points? I have family members who have it right now and they don't use it to weaponise sympathy from others. Sean Brennan has it here and you have to ask him specifically to get any information about it out of him. Normal people don't use these very serious things for sympathy so please SHUT THE FU*K UP ABOUT IT

wow

johnny is bang out of order