Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Posted: 30 Mar 2023, 08:18
Dominic Ingle thinks Bradley is talking rubbish. Do you think that Ingle is deluded?
Dominic Ingle thinks Bradley is talking rubbish. Do you think that Ingle is deluded?
People have different opinions. Incidentally, Ingle's old fighter, Johnny Nelson, has gone on record and said it looks like Fury didn't want any part of Uysk.
There is a popular account on Twitter called “Company Nelson” that takes the mickey out of his biased views whereas Ingle is known for his straight talking.big lennox wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 11:15People have different opinions. Incidentally, Ingle's old fighter, Johnny Nelson, has gone on record and said it looks like Fury didn't want any part of Uysk.
I wouldn't describe either Ingle or Nelson as being deluded, quite the opposite, in fact. But, on this issue, my perception of Fury's willingness to take on Uysk is similar to Nelsons and Bradley's (both top draw fighters).That view point appears to be the majority view.
You have a different view. And that's ok.
The whole thing seems a mystery, to be honest. Very frustrating to watch from the outside and even more so for everyone involved, I would imagine. I can really sense the frustration in Fury's promoters that the fight, for whatever reasons didn't happen. It seems very clear that they really wanted it.BigDoofus wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 11:34There is a popular account on Twitter called “Company Nelson” that takes the mickey out of his biased views whereas Ingle is known for his straight talking.big lennox wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 11:15People have different opinions. Incidentally, Ingle's old fighter, Johnny Nelson, has gone on record and said it looks like Fury didn't want any part of Uysk.
I wouldn't describe either Ingle or Nelson as being deluded, quite the opposite, in fact. But, on this issue, my perception of Fury's willingness to take on Uysk is similar to Nelsons and Bradley's (both top draw fighters).That view point appears to be the majority view.
You have a different view. And that's ok.
Viewpoints change over time. It’s still not clear why Usyk fled East.
big lennox wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 12:02The whole thing seems a mystery, to be honest. Very frustrating to watch from the outside and even more so for everyone involved, I would imagine. I can really sense the frustration in Fury's promoters that the fight, for whatever reasons didn't happen. It seems very clear that they really wanted it.BigDoofus wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 11:34There is a popular account on Twitter called “Company Nelson” that takes the mickey out of his biased views whereas Ingle is known for his straight talking.big lennox wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 11:15
People have different opinions. Incidentally, Ingle's old fighter, Johnny Nelson, has gone on record and said it looks like Fury didn't want any part of Uysk.
I wouldn't describe either Ingle or Nelson as being deluded, quite the opposite, in fact. But, on this issue, my perception of Fury's willingness to take on Uysk is similar to Nelsons and Bradley's (both top draw fighters).That view point appears to be the majority view.
You have a different view. And that's ok.
Viewpoints change over time. It’s still not clear why Usyk fled East.
I'm gutted it is not happening for boxing's sake*, and because it would have been a fascinating encounter between two top draw sportsmen.
* previously, I always felt it was over the top, when big fights fell through, to say that boxing was in danger of becoming obsolete. Today, it is different with social media around. The big fights of the year seem to be with Jake Paul and KSI, and those types of occasions will gather pace if the big boxing fights don't happen.
To my mind, it's mental that Joe Joyce isn't on pay per view but KSI and Jake Paul are.
Bradley works for ESPN who work closely with Fury, has Bradley ever even worked with Al Haymon?
Beyond Parody is Big John, he'll never be happy until he's worked his way back in as Tyson's lead trainerControversial wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 13:49 John Fury has said Tyson Fury should SACK SugarHill Steward for comments after the Oleksandr Usyk collapse: “What the hell was that about? 'I'm only here for Okolie.' I've seen him training Tyson. He denied him like Judas denied Jesus. That's a sacking offence.” [@Metro_Sport]
He kicked off with Ben after the Wallin fight didn’t he?handsofstone wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 14:28Beyond Parody is Big John, he'll never be happy until he's worked his way back in as Tyson's lead trainerControversial wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 13:49 John Fury has said Tyson Fury should SACK SugarHill Steward for comments after the Oleksandr Usyk collapse: “What the hell was that about? 'I'm only here for Okolie.' I've seen him training Tyson. He denied him like Judas denied Jesus. That's a sacking offence.” [@Metro_Sport]
Lolhandsofstone wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 14:25Bradley works for ESPN who work closely with Fury, has Bradley ever even worked with Al Haymon?
just read this same story john going on the offensive to make it look like its not tysons faultControversial wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 13:49 John Fury has said Tyson Fury should SACK SugarHill Steward for comments after the Oleksandr Usyk collapse: “What the hell was that about? 'I'm only here for Okolie.' I've seen him training Tyson. He denied him like Judas denied Jesus. That's a sacking offence.” [@Metro_Sport]
Thank goodness for thatdan28uk wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 15:12just read this same story john going on the offensive to make it look like its not tysons faultControversial wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 13:49 John Fury has said Tyson Fury should SACK SugarHill Steward for comments after the Oleksandr Usyk collapse: “What the hell was that about? 'I'm only here for Okolie.' I've seen him training Tyson. He denied him like Judas denied Jesus. That's a sacking offence.” [@Metro_Sport]
si7dog7 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 15:17Thank goodness for thatdan28uk wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 15:12just read this same story john going on the offensive to make it look like its not tysons faultControversial wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 13:49 John Fury has said Tyson Fury should SACK SugarHill Steward for comments after the Oleksandr Usyk collapse: “What the hell was that about? 'I'm only here for Okolie.' I've seen him training Tyson. He denied him like Judas denied Jesus. That's a sacking offence.” [@Metro_Sport]
Coz we all listen to that guy and take his spiel as gospel.
The bs and lies are so apparent it has become laughable.
I’m sure FW will be under fire soon because he couldn’t defend the nonsense
You couldn’t make this up
100%The Gratest wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 14:08 Respect to Sugar HillHe wasn't willing to give up his integrity and lie of out his ass for the Fury shitshow.
That's rightRuthless-RKO wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 14:33He kicked off with Ben after the Wallin fight didn’t he?handsofstone wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 14:28Beyond Parody is Big John, he'll never be happy until he's worked his way back in as Tyson's lead trainerControversial wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 13:49 John Fury has said Tyson Fury should SACK SugarHill Steward for comments after the Oleksandr Usyk collapse: “What the hell was that about? 'I'm only here for Okolie.' I've seen him training Tyson. He denied him like Judas denied Jesus. That's a sacking offence.” [@Metro_Sport]
Yes, which is why I wish the entire Fury clan would just piss off. It's buggering up the heavyweight division - it's an embarrassment. It's a shame Peter Fury was ostracised, he seemed the only one with any sense.
Now he does, you clown.The Gratest wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 15:11Lolhandsofstone wrote: ↑30 Mar 2023, 14:25Bradley works for ESPN who work closely with Fury, has Bradley ever even worked with Al Haymon?